هنوز فک میکنی اینا که ارایش میکنن قشنگن؟ نه عزیزم اونا لوازم ارایش خوب دارن. پاتوقشونم اینجاست؛ @shop

Channel
hihopefully
@hihopefully
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20,348subscribers
-104 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001808138102 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hihopefully |
| Description | هدیه ای برای حال خوب تو🌱 یادت نره بخندی :) @happyevaan:ارتباط با ما @tabligh_hi:تعرفه تبلیغات و قبول سفارش کار https://www.instagram.com/hihopefully |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hihopefully |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:14 | 20,348 | -120 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 20,468 | -160 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 20,628 | -155 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 20,783 | -216 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 20,999 | -110 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 21,109 | -171 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 21,280 | +828 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 20,452 | first reading |
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.2%
- avg views ÷ 20,348 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,270
- 40 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.444%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 40
- of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (1 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 90,843 |
| Reactions total | 374 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 939
- Videos
- 213
- Links
- 108
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
357 reactions across 22 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 135 | 37.8% | |
| 👍 | 59 | 16.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 38 | 10.6% | |
| 🥰 | 26 | 7.28% | |
| 😍 | 21 | 5.88% | |
| 😇 | 17 | 4.76% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 4.20% | |
| 🤗 | 13 | 3.64% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 2.52% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 2.24% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.40% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.12% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.84% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.84% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 374reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
پروفایل ست میخوای بیاا
همه چیز در مورد سلامت لیدی ها
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍5❤4❤🔥3🥰2
🌿𝓘 𝓸𝓷𝓵𝔂 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓽𝔀𝓸 𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓼𝓸 𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝔂 𝓭𝓪𝔂 𝓘 𝓱𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓮 𝔀𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓘 𝓬𝓪𝓷 𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓻𝔂. 𝓡𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓽 𝓲𝓼 𝓪 𝔀𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓸𝓯 𝓪 𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓭, 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓼𝓸 𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓰𝓮𝓻. 𝓞𝓷𝓮 𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓸𝓼𝓽 𝓪𝓵𝔀𝓪𝔂𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓮𝓭 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓱𝓸𝓹𝓮. 𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓸𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓻 𝓱𝓸𝓵𝓭𝓼 𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽 𝓽𝓸 𝔂𝓸𝓾. -𝓚𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓪 𝓜𝓪𝓱𝓻 من فقط دو دست دارم، و بنابراین هر روز باید تصمیم بگیرم چه چیزی را میتوانم با خودم حمل کنم. حسرت، هدر دادنِ یک دست است؛ خشم هم همینطور... یکی از دستها را تقریباً همیشه برای امید نگه میدارم. و دست دیگر را، ب
❤5👌3😍3👍2🐳1
پرامپت ترند عکس با کودکی
این چنل مخصوص سینگلاس:))❤️
راز زیتون پرورده بازاری
Sticker, posted without a caption
😍6❤5👍5
آنگاه که همه چیز به هم میریزد هیچ کاری هم که از دستم برنیاید حداقل میتوانم سعی کنم آرامشم را حفظ کنم #بیکلام #پیانو به اصرار زیادتون موسیقی های کانال برمیگرده طبق روال:) @hihopefully
❤9👍3🙏3❤🔥2
درجواب عشقم عاشقتم بگو؛
bio (●♡∀♡)love
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @hihopefully. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 294,261 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@danestani_2400 · 5,6712 posts「پنآھِحَـــرَم」
@PNAH_HARM · 24,8452 posts• آکادمی کنکور رایا 🌱•
@The_strongest1 · 6272 postsآیا میدونستی...؟!
@AYAMedonsti · 10,4301 postدانستنیهای جالب
@bedoniy · 4,0161 postبنام مادر پدر
@benamepedar_madar · 34,5911 post|بیتآیی|
@BitaDd · 10,1281 postدلنویس ❤️
@delnvesa · 8,7571 postدیوارنوشت
@divar_neveshtha · 20,6451 post🦋رویای پروانه ها🦋
@el00m · 2,1911 post😂خندونی😂
@khandooni4000 · 1,4821 post♨️میم مثل مـــ❤️ـــادر♨️
@madardostatdaramj · 21,7591 postنبض احساس💕
@Nabzehsassiii · 6,6671 postعُــشّــاقُ الـرُقَــیـِّـِہ{سلام الله}
@Oshaghroghaye_315 · 16,5411 postتیکه شاخ سنگین
@Pieceofhorn · 1,6621 postاستـــوری خاص،پروفایل شیڪ💝
@profilshiky · 17,1801 postبانو
@q_banoo · 4,7151 post《بیوگرافی 😈 خفن■تیکه دار 》
@RemiXsafa · 9,2091 post💞اشعار مولانا،سعدی💞
@shere_molavi · 32,5371 postڪربلانرفتھها🕊••
@STORY_HARAM · 17,3741 post| ستـــ⭐️ـاره بــــارون |
@supernovaas · 5,2021 post| تناقص |
@tanaghoss · 91 post•[ وصـٰال ]•🌵
@vesssal · 25,8391 post『یــآدِٺبــاشــد』
@yadet_bashad313 · 15,5301 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@hihopefully named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“hihopefully” (@hihopefully), 20,348 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hihopefully.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.