Channel
@higher_geometry
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
241subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001811955033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @higher_geometry |
| Description | Этот канал посвящен одноименному направлению математики и связанному с ним русскоязычному сообществу. Если вы хотите добавиться на форум сообщества, напишите нам с помощью бота @higher_geometry_feedback_bot. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/higher_geometry |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 241 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 241 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 10 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
45 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 44.4% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 28.9% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 15.6% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2025 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Texas Tech Topology and Geometry Seminar: May 5, 18:00 (Moscow time) Maxime Ramzi (University of Münster)— Rigid commutative algebras and a generalized 1D cobordism hypothesis Baez and Dolan's cobordism hypothesis, in dimension 1, describes the free symmetric monoidal infinity-category on a dualizable object as a certain cobordism category. It's only reasonable to try and guess what a generalization of this may loo…
🔥1
Texas Tech Topology and Geometry Seminar: April 22, 02:00 (Moscow time, strictly night) Kensuke Arakawa (Kyoto University) — On the equivalence of two approaches to multiplicative homotopy theories Locally presentable (∞,1) categories admit two popular models: Presentable quasicategories and combinatorial model categories. Building on the foundational work of Dugger and Lurie, Pavlov proved that their associated (∞…
❤3🤯3
Texas Tech Quantum Homotopy Seminar: April 15, 18:00 (Moscow time) Ignat Romanov (Qiuzhen College, Tsinghua University) — Connections on ordinary principal G-bundles. Atiyah algebroids. The Zoom link is available here (message here to join the Higher Geometry Telegram forum).
🔥2❤1
Texas Tech Topology and Geometry Seminar: April 14, 18:00 (Moscow time) Pablo Bustillo Vazquez (Northwestern University) — Fully-Dualizable and Invertible E_n-Algebras The easiest source of fully extended TQFTs is found in E_n-algebras: for any symmetric monoidal category V and E_n-algebra A in V, one automatically obtains an n-dimensional TQFT given by factorization homology. Sometimes, however, these TQFTs can b…
Texas Tech Quantum Homotopy Seminar: 1 апреля, 18:00 (по Москве) Vasiliy Volkov — Derived manifolds Ссылка на Zoom доступна здесь (напишите сюда, чтобы присоединиться к телеграм-форуму Higher Geometry).
💅4❤1🙏1
https://t.me/mipt_math/356
Texas Tech Quantum Homotopy Seminar: 25 марта, 18:00 (по Москве) Grisha Taroyan — ∞-sheaves / stacks on smooth manifolds Ссылка на Zoom доступна здесь (напишите сюда, чтобы присоединиться к телеграм-форуму Higher Geometry).
❤3
Texas Tech Quantum Homotopy Seminar: 11 марта, 18:00 по Москве This semester's topic is higher and derived differential geometry. We aim to cover sufficient background to understand the definition of a connection on a principal ∞-bundle in the paper "Symmetries and Higher-Form Connections in Derived Differential Geometry" (Feb 2026) by Bunk, Müller, Nuiten, Szabo. The first talk will be an introductory talk, discus…
🔥4
Texas Tech Quantum Homotopy Seminar: 30 апреля, 20:00 по Москве Ignat Romanov (BISMA) — The Higgs field and symmetry breaking Ссылка на Zoom доступна здесь (напишите сюда, чтобы присоединиться к телеграм-форуму Higher Geometry).
🔥2
Texas Tech Topology and Geometry Seminar: 30 апреля, 18:00 по Москве Mayuko Yamashita (Perimeter Institute) — Topological elliptic genera There is a classical notion of elliptic genera, which assigns Jacobi forms to SU-manifolds. In this talk, I explain my work with Ying-Hsuan Lin (arXiv:2412.02298) to give its homotopy-theoretical refinements and variants, which we call “topological elliptic genera”. The codomain …
🔥3
Texas Tech Topology and Geometry Seminar: 23 апреля, 18:00 по Москве Nivedita (University of Oxford) — Bicommutant categories from conformal nets Two-dimensional chiral conformal field theories (CFTs) admit three distinct mathematical formulations: vertex operator algebras (VOAs), conformal nets, and Segal (functorial) chiral CFTs. With the broader aim to build fully extended Segal chiral CFTs, we start with the i…
❤2
Texas Tech Topology and Geometry Seminar: 9 апреля, 18:00 по Москве Sean Sanford (OSU) — Manifestly unitary higher Hilbert spaces A key aspect of quantum theory its insistence that states evolve via unitary transformations. In order to understand the symmetries of higher dimensional quantum field theory, we need to develop higher dimensional analogues of unitarity. The language and theory of higher categories has g…
❤4🤯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @higher_geometry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 419,532 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Higher geometry” (@higher_geometry), 241 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/higher_geometry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.