2 measurements spanning 2 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 577–580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 10:36
577
-3
17 Sept 2026, 05:22
580
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 9 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
57s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
132 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
88
66.7%
custom 5458476483402021766
18
13.6%
custom 5210744041079063997
10
7.58%
🍓
7
5.30%
🐳
5
3.79%
🤣
3
2.27%
🙏
1
0.758%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2024 to 7 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @helenprodvizhenie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 October 2024 to 7 December 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мне заблокировали телеграм 📵
И это правда))
Не так конечно я планировала вернуться в канал спустя месяц отсутствия😆 ну как есть
Стольким с вами хотелось поделиться и рассказать, что происходила за кадроб в рабочих процессах и почему месяц я не вела канал.
Это кстати самый длинный срок отсутсвия контента в моем канале со дня его существования. Максимум было 1,5 недели.
Всем привет! Кто еще есть тут 🙌
Случилось э…
Наконец-то мы это сделали!
Не прошло и пол года😂
Ахренеть! Реально же прошло пол года, как я приняла решение собрать и провести свой первый экспертный круг в телеграм с целью продвижения канала и набора новых подписчиков.
Это был июнь. День созвона с девчонками из настава. До созвона даже не думала, что буду это делать. Так, чисто гоняла мысли в голове пару дней до.
Созвон. Все делятся, рассказывают как дела, как…
Простая причина отсутствия продаж, которая лежит на поверхности
«Лена, спасибо за честность. Об этом не говорят на курсах. Я думала целевое действия для продаж это продающий вебинар или эфир, прогрев и все такое»
- сказала на созвоне Женя, которая у меня сейчас в личной работе.
И вот эта как раз та самая ошибка, которая лежит на поверхности и влияет на отсуствие продаж.
Путать целевые действия для продаж и для прд…
Как вызывать желание у подписчиков читать взахлеб твой канал и покупать у тебя снова и снова
В выходные ходила на концерт саундтреков к известным фильмам в исполнении симфонического оркестра при свечах.
Когда покупали билеты, первым делом обратила внимание на сайт.
Открываешь и тут же погружаешься в атмосферу концерта.
Ролик с фрагментами, музыка, смена кадров. Мгновение и ты поплыл и больше не подвластен себе😁
…
Ты щас не поверишь, что произошло 😱 человек купил! Незнакомый прикинь
Не могла не поделиться этими эмоциями Жени от первой ее продажи с канала. Когда человек ещё и сам купил. Они такие настоящие …!
Ладно, что я вам тут уши заговариваю про «Сам купил» 😁
Чтобы «сам купил» мы полностью перешили всю стратегию РАЗ,
↩️
расшили продуктовую линейку и создали ещё один продукт под запрос аудитории- ДВА,
↩️
вкусно и продающ…
Кто здесь прогульщица?🤔👀
Не знаю такой , а вы ?
Всего лишь 4 дня без контента. При этом у меня есть серьезные оправдания.
Было много процессов за блогом и остаётся.
1️⃣У нас прошла на УРА онлайн - конференция для экспертов на прошлой недели.Пока первая из 3х в этом месяце.
Во-первых, мы увеличили вовлечённость участников в выступления спикеров.
Во-вторых, у нас ахрененно в этот раз зашла реклама и принесла нам …
Друзья, я не знаю 🤷 ссылку на оплату уже переделала , но она снова не грузится. Что-то с платформой может
Кто хочет запрыгнуть на мастер-класс , напишите мне в личку @lenaklimova «хочу на мк» .
Я отправлю другой способ оплаты
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @helenprodvizhenie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@helenprodvizhenie named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@lenaklimova named in 1 post, 18 September 2026 – 18 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Анна Отавина @otavinaann · 24,016 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МОГУ СЕБЕ ПОЗВОЛИТЬ” (@helenprodvizhenie), 577 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helenprodvizhenie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
