8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,240–36,319 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:35
36,249
-12
11 Aug 2026, 14:02
36,261
-17
10 Aug 2026, 15:13
36,278
-4
9 Aug 2026, 16:01
36,282
-13
8 Aug 2026, 17:37
36,295
-8
7 Aug 2026, 17:15
36,303
-7
7 Aug 2026, 07:45
36,310
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:37
36,310
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
40.1%
avg views ÷ 36,249 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,500
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
15 (17 June 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
116,320
Reactions total
2,461
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈8,820
Videos
≈410
Links
≈6,580
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
4,068 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,021
49.7%
🔥
916
22.5%
😁
433
10.6%
🤔
233
5.73%
😢
202
4.97%
🗿
198
4.87%
🌚
45
1.11%
⚡
20
0.492%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,068reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 15 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hardblitz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
С февраля я запустил рубрику для стрим-канала аккаунт без доната!
Изначально идея была в том, чтобы окунуться в те самые времена 2015-2017 года, когда я ещё прокачивал основной аккаунт EviL_BlackBerrY...
Но я уже сыграл более 1000 боёв на новом аккаунте с начала 2026 года и готов поделиться мнением, почему я не получил ностальгические воспоминания:
— Топ списка: до 500 боёв на танках до 7 уровня включительно, КАЖДЫ…
🫡Бесконечные снаряды в бою, нуждались ли мы в них?
Да, безусловно при игре в режимах, где есть жизни, порой не хватает снарядов (Big Boss, возрождение итд)
Только при игре в них можно было задуматься разработчикам о вшивании безлимитных снарядов…
Да даже в том же выживании, где нужно хилить союзников, приходилось пересобирать БК, добавляя больше фугасных снарядов, чтобы отхиливать чуть больше прочности
Но вытекают …
Ну что танкисты как вам обновление?
Мне очень зашло, вот бы только бан карт раскатили в будущем для всех, а с премом прикрутили +1 карту
В остальном хочется надеятся, что разработчики на начнут играть грязно, чтобы вырубить Леста API - чтобы привлечь больше внимания к внутренней сессионке в ангаре за прем - если API отключат, как это было уже в 2024 году, то сторонние сервисы по обмену информации с клиента игры раб…
Мне кажется или на ВК Фесте на стенде Tanks Blitz'а нету людей?🥺
Столько кружочков от Кирилла я не видел не с одного офлайн-события, или это рвение к кружкам в солнечное воскресенье?
👉Blitz Hard
⏳Я один триггерюсь, что в игре летом в ангаре круглосуточная зима?
Я понимаю, что там в настройках можно выключить погоду, но порой прикольно что во время сессии бывает то вечер, то ночь итд...
Но какая к черту зима? Это такое самовнушение для игроков - чел холодно на улице, сиди в танки играй!
👉Blitz Hard
⏳22 поинта залутали все, по моим прогнозам
Зная до итогов, что популярная и не популярная карта не зашла у меня, я чет думал поинтов меньше выйдет, ну а так довольствуемся что имеем🤝
Порт и Альпы что играться не будут, даже подумать не мог авхахв
👉Blitz Hard
🏥Гайд: как обесценить аватар за 13 часов просмотра трансляции турнира
1) Ловим проблемы с трансляцией
2) Слушаем нытье танкистов
3) Выкатываем компенсацию, где аватар раздают всем, кто посмотрел хотя бы 1 час, вместо 13 часов))
❌Настроить компенсацию на аватар, кто получил 20+ контов
✅В очередной раз доказать, что разрабы не играют в игру и не представляют ценности для коллекционеров редких приколов в игре
👉Blitz …
🏖Прогнозы на ЛБП Сезон III, часть 4 от EviL_BlackBerrY
Ежевика балдел июнь месяц, и только одним глазом подглядывал в киберспорт, хотя в целом весь прогноз полный рандомайзер зачастую, ведь турнирные менеджеры пришли уже к здоровой конкуренции и предсказывать тут сложно!
— Мне так нравиться вопрос про количество моделей танков, до тех пор, пока в сетапе не увидешь внезапный Grille 15 или ИС-7
— В вопросе про урон и…
А теперь можно выдохнуть!
Обмен на 1500 золота вернулся на своё место!
ЛИКУЕМ!
Победные фонарики:
#13 - 2000 золота
#14 - 3000 золота
#10 - 10 000 золота
Остальные фонарики, лучше поменять в прем-шопе на 1500 голды, вместо на 500 голды через хранилище))
👉Blitz Hard
Ну жуки! Супер дермовый поступок!😐
Когда было известно 2 билета по голде, в игре ещё 18 часов доступно к обмену флаер на 1500 голды - логично, что если третий билет не сыграет, игрок просто залутает 1500 голды, вместо 500...
НО НЕЕЕЕТ, ОНИ В КРЫСУ ПРОСТО УБРАЛИ С ПРОДАЖИ ОБМЕН!
ОПЯТЬ ГЕЙМ-ДИЗАЙНЕР ЗАПЛАНИРОВАЛ?😂
👉Blitz Hard
❤201😢30😁13🌚9🗿4
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @hardblitz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,005,308 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tanks Blitz @tanks_blitz_official · 486,481 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Blitz Hard” (@hardblitz), 36,249 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hardblitz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
