4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,218–3,224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 05:01
3,219
-4
8 Aug 2026, 04:53
3,223
+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:30
3,222
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:41
3,222
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
356 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💩
103
28.9%
👍
100
28.1%
❤
58
16.3%
🔥
47
13.2%
🤝
21
5.90%
🤷♂
7
1.97%
🐳
5
1.40%
😇
4
1.12%
🤔
4
1.12%
😱
2
0.562%
🤡
2
0.562%
🥴
2
0.562%
🎃
1
0.281%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 356reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2025 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptopodpolie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 September 2025 to 8 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Привет, всем выжившим криптанам-танкистам) 👋 стример на связи!
Есть кое-чем поделиться про крипту и про группу в целом.
1. Сегодня купил эфира (занес кровные в банк и официально на бел бирже купил в белую ETH)
*это не финансовый совет, я не призываю затариваться криптой
**я просто решил поделиться тем, что курс сейчас низкий и для покупки крипты неплохое время, но! Курс может и ниже пойдет, никто не знает будущее
…
https://t.me/qlyukerbot/start?startapp=bro-1573013055 - рефка Андрюха Kraft
https://t.me/qlyukerbot/start?startapp=bro-408017005 - рефка Стас D_W_S
Потапали вместе? Яндекс Станции, смартфоны, ноутбуки и ТВ, мультиподписки Плюс на год разыграют уже 29 декабря. Лови дружеский бонус по моей ссылке и тапай
Игра похожа на кликер от ноткоина, само приложение будто от Яндекса (дает скидки на разные предложения)
*пост Ан…
Раздача #6 дроп HOT:
- на 100 человек
- по 0.25 (это максимум)
https://app.hot-labs.org/link?claim-d9f63fa580
Пароль: E100
🤝6💩5❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptopodpolie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tanks Blitz @tanks_blitz_official · 486,481 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Криптоподполье Blitz” (@cryptopodpolie), 3,219 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptopodpolie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.