Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 68 days, net -321. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,374–19,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Oct 2026, 07:17
19,423
-17
9 Oct 2026, 01:58
19,440
-4
4 Oct 2026, 13:56
19,444
-56
26 Sept 2026, 08:42
19,500
-41
19 Sept 2026, 09:57
19,541
-15
16 Sept 2026, 19:39
19,556
-14
14 Sept 2026, 20:40
19,570
-14
13 Sept 2026, 03:58
19,584
-5
11 Sept 2026, 07:16
19,589
-17
8 Sept 2026, 15:02
19,606
-27
5 Sept 2026, 07:37
19,633
+4
3 Sept 2026, 09:54
19,629
-11
2 Sept 2026, 02:21
19,640
-6
1 Sept 2026, 01:38
19,646
-2
31 Aug 2026, 01:23
19,648
-15
29 Aug 2026, 06:18
19,663
+8
26 Aug 2026, 03:28
19,655
-15
25 Aug 2026, 05:34
19,670
-11
24 Aug 2026, 04:33
19,681
+7
22 Aug 2026, 15:47
19,674
first reading
Engagement
126 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 126 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,601 reactions across 121 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,661
59.0%
❤🔥
1,092
11.4%
🔥
704
7.33%
👍
664
6.92%
👎
239
2.49%
😁
231
2.41%
🥰
152
1.58%
🎉
102
1.06%
🫡
83
0.864%
🤡
70
0.729%
🍾
68
0.708%
🤯
59
0.615%
💯
53
0.552%
✍
50
0.521%
🤣
49
0.51%
💩
48
0.5%
👌
46
0.479%
🏆
28
0.292%
😎
24
0.25%
😭
18
0.187%
32 further kinds
160
1.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 126 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,011 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 126 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CrewGTW_Official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 126 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#жизнь
Мама откопала старую фотографию, которую сделал папка после получения номеров на Audi A6, которую я тогда купил за великие для меня 550 тысяч рублей. Было время! Видео по ней есть на канале если кому-то интересно. Забавно как я тогда мыслил об автомобилях. Хорошо, что удалось много всего попробовать после и составить более обширную картину (первое и главное в которой побольше пробовать и поменьше смотреть обзо…
Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @CrewGTW_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Лампа знаний - армия, техника, оружие @LampaInfo · 8,171#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
War Thunder Mobile @WarThunderMobile · 23,206 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 October 2026
War Thunder | RU @warthunderru · 86,922 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CrewGTW” (@CrewGTW_Official), 19,423 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CrewGTW_Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
