2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–40 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 19:46
39
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:29
39
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 19 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
7
Videos
2
Links
5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
64 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
31
48.4%
🔥
17
26.6%
🥰
6
9.38%
👍
5
7.81%
❤🔥
3
4.69%
👏
2
3.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2025 to 7 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Екатеринбург ❤️
16 мая состоится однодневный тренинг по Сенсорике - это не про «ещё одну практику».
Это про то, как соединить вашу голову и тело, это про близость с собой, со своими чувствами, ощущениями и эмоциями.
Это групповой формат, где вы по взаимодействует с собой, в парах - увидите свои стратегии поведения и то, как вы выстраиваете контекст с миром, с собой, с окружающими.
Это 8 часов, где ты наконец перес…
Ты точно знаешь кто перед тобой
или снова додумываешь за человека, а потом удивляешься почему все пошло по пизде?
19 декабря у нас живой мастер класс
«Кто я»
Про профайлинг и умение читать людей
Не эзотерика
Не магия
А навык который должен быть у каждого нормального взрослого человека в 2026 году
Что будет внутри
Ты разберешься в себе
Кто ты по факту
Как тебя считывают другие
Почему ты снова и снова попадаешь в о…
Значит, что ещё из новостей в Екб! Мы готовим ивент учитывая ваши пожелания
А так же планируем начать полезные встречи раз в неделю, где будем вас разбирать и отвечать на вопросы. Они будут бесплатные, но попасть только по рекомендации можно будет.
И место очень кайфовое.
Екб, у нас проблема с мероприятиями. И да, я говорю про развивающие, деловые и делово-развлекательные форматы. Не бухач, а эмоциональная и интеллектуальная еда. Хочу нормальную кухню, а не вчерашний фастфуд.
Что бесит сейчас
1. Продают места спикерам. Когда спикер платит за сцену, обычно это либо слабый спикер, либо его пока не знают. Чаще первое. В итоге люди слушают посредственность.
2. Нетворкинг по методике кр…
Если ты научился выступать со стендапом и при этом делать это в кайф всё, можешь считать, жизнь изменилась.
Потому что как только ты можешь выйти куда-то, пошутить, не напрягаться и получать от этого удовольствие ты становишься магнитом.
Люди чувствуют, и начинают к тебе тянуться.
Вот пример.
За последние два месяца я выступил четыре раза стендап, спикерки, всякое разное.
И просто после этого ко мне пришло 12 платны…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @gutsa_anonsekb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Планирую живой провокативный мк. В каком городе вы бы прошли?
Екб 18.0227%
СПб 2.03.12%
Мск 6.0332%
Краснодар где то 16-18.0329%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2025 to 7 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гуцалюк|ЕКБ” (@gutsa_anonsekb), 39 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gutsa_anonsekb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
