Channel
@grind_ok
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
705subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003221907111 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grind_ok |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grind_ok |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 705 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 704 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 704 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
280 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 78 | 27.9% | |
| ❤ | 63 | 22.5% | |
| 🤡 | 52 | 18.6% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 13.9% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 6.79% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 2.50% | |
| 💊 | 4 | 1.43% | |
| 🖕 | 4 | 1.43% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.07% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 1.07% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.714% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.714% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.714% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.357% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.357% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Итоги за 2 месяца от гарного к среднему За май вышел неплохой профит в 1.5x от предыдущего месяца апреля. Темок было меньше, но отрабатывались получше + Егор джан подсказал одну тему где у меня завис деп и в итоге там и вышли эти 1.5x вместо такого же профита. Июнь же принес в 2 раза меньше от майского. В целом пойдет так как фокус на софт и перспективу чем на профит здесь и сейчас. Фул тайм этого затишья рынка пр…
🔥20💊3🙏2
Итоги месяца Месяц был сначала нудным, а потом развернулся в гиперактивный и так периодами. Было много всяческих взломов, но бля больше половины это просто пиздили стейблы и особо нечего было сделать. Зато были дни типо DOT и MUSD, MEZO где получилось вынести основной профит месяца. Расписывать что там было не буду уже за это все посты есть. Остальное время были в целом почти одинаковые дни с средним профитом. Ос…
❤19🔥4
Разбор месяца по темкам Аккуратно, много текста, серьезно бля не шучу IMT где раскачивали токен на биржах и он медленно догонял в сети immutable, качали в лютые иксы и можно было гонять постоянно в сеть эфира и потом на биржу в 2-3 иногда 7-10x. BRZ слили и пегнули, да лоуликвид, но на мелкую сумму 50-200$ было около 30x с дна. THE единственный час когда были не у пк в сутках сука. Можно было лутать гоняя с биржи…
🔥7😎3
Потужна ситуевіна (за название поста спасибо @egorarbi) В парсер прилетел алерт о дампе sLGNS. Пошел чекать и поняв что это обертка, чекнул ориг проект и начал искать сайт где можно стейкать/анстейкать. Сразу найдя, тестанул откуп и анстейк, получилось и тут же бля свеча в ебеня к пегу, а то есть 2x. Не растерявшись пошел флипать разными способами. Также набирая лимитками и кидая в анстейк, жаль ток кибер давал о…
👍5❤1
128k$ -> 4k$ arbitrage :D https://solscan.io/tx/5A1YuYHff5RYiZd57M4Ko7PaqoX1GMsYGny9AVaVn826bS1w4nxwbRDyHs4bqJgV6yZfRVQAjmGFDRp9kL6aMGV2 https://solscan.io/tx/3o3YjoWuSCPsfAukkfgK1sRUhjjrdXPMRNgZvtf6GEovTF9rReCCwbvAoic6to7QJprfH38Q1HgHUGypnxiQS6r3
😁14🤡2
Топ тулза для быстрого поиска дампера токенов Для тех кто сталкивался с транзакциями в которых инициатор не владелец токенов и надо быстро понять сколько токенов еще осталось https://blocksec.com/phalcon/explorer Создает удобная карту перемещения токенов, где можно быстро сориентироваться откуда токены ушли изначально.
❤18🔥6👍2🤡2
Раунд ту, файт Как уже видели сигналы на бридж токена, надеюсь. В общем какие-то челы нашли лендинги где еще можно было брать займ по цене 0.9$ около того. Начали пампить цену на дексе и сливать туда частями. Пример такой транзы В итоге можно было откупать в сети эфира и или гнать в base, или сливать там же, но в меньший профит. Цену даже доводили до фул пега в моменте. Получилось вынести, немношко
👍7❤4
Поддержите пост кента, более детально описал сам взлом https://x.com/onchain_scout/status/2035623868686061598?s=20
👍11
НЕ СПАЛ 22.03.2026 Хакер получил токены в этой транзакции. Вот сам кошелек хакера: 0x04a288a7789dd6ade935361a4fb1ec5db513caed Начал лупить продажами по стакану, а боты откупали. Были спреды меж сетями с бриджом stargate. Как я понял в итоге цена держалась из-за больших залогов в разных лендинг протоколах где можно было по цене 0.9$ брать займ, везде мб по разному. Что делал я: Откупал лимитками и бриджил в спр…
🔥17❤2👍1
Вроде уже не дает, похоже закончился пул
https://fluid.io/dashboard/1 Заносите в сапли обертку потом боровите, откупаете лимиткой ниже бороу по 0.91
🔥3👍1
https://web3.okx.com/ru/token/ethereum/0x1202f5c7b4b9e47a1a484e8b270be34dbbc75055 https://web3.okx.com/ru/token/ethereum/0x66a1e37c9b0eaddca17d3662d6c05f4decf3e110 Хакер: https://debank.com/profile/0x04a288a7789dd6ade935361a4fb1ec5db513caed/history Лучше поздно чем никогда
👍4🤨2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @grind_ok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 11,306 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@grind_ok named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Grind” (@grind_ok), 705 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grind_ok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.