¿Te has preguntado cuál modelo de negocio es el mejor para ti? Te voy a dar un vistazo a tres opciones que me han funcionado: 🔹 **Afiliación:** Ideal si no quieres crear tus propios productos. Es sencillo; solo promocionas lo de otros y ganas comisión. Requiere buena estrategia de marketing. 🔹 **Infoproductos:** Si sabes de un tema, ¿por qué no crear un curso o ebook? Es trabajo al principio, pero después puede gen…

Channel
Genera ingresos por internet
@GIPI182
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
130subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002473702290 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GIPI182 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GIPI182 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 130 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 130 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 37.6%
- avg views ÷ 130 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 48.8
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (29 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 879 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 356
- Videos
- 61
- Links
- 678
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
¿Cómo sabes si una oportunidad online es real o solo una estafa? 🤔 Primero, investiga: busca reseñas y experiencias de otros usuarios. Si la mayoría dicen que es una trampa, mejor escapa. Segundo, un sitio confiable debería tener información clara de contacto y políticas. Si no hay datos físicos o respuestas rápidas, algo huele mal. Y, por último, confía en tu instinto: si suena demasiado bueno para ser verdad, prob…
¿Sabías que hay herramientas y plataformas que realmente pueden ayudarte a generar ingresos pasivos? Te voy a contar un par de opciones que he usado. 🚀 Primero, considera utilizar plataformas como Dodo AI, donde puedes hacer tareas simples y recibir pagos sin necesidad de inversión previa. A mí me han funcionado bastante bien. 💸 Otra opción son los bots de generación de ingresos en Telegram. Son fáciles de usar y t…
🔥ATENCIÓN🔥 LA SEMANA PASADA NOS DEJÓ MUCHO PARA TENER EN CUENTA. 👀Recapitulemos lo más importante para encarar esta semana con más precisión: 👉El Lunes Coinbase afirmó que la Clarity Act se votará el 3 de agosto... Es decir, mañana. ▪️El tráfico en el Estrecho de Bab al-Mandab cayó un 50% (por acá pasa el 12% del petróleo global). 👉El Martes el CRASH en los mercados asiáticos continuó. ▪️También el Senado informó…
¡TUS FACTURAS VALEN DINERO! Gana Tokens IDLE con Bills on Chain youtu.be/CA4NZFCq8Ys #GanarDinero #KGEN #CriptoGratis #IngresosPasivos #IA #FinanzasPersonales #NanoCoin
Ajá quien quiere ganar 100% de su inversión para hacer trading me explico deposita 200 y te regalo 200 tendrás 400$ para hacer trading en uno de los mejores brokers regulados del mundo enviame al privado si estás interesado
Ajá quien quiere ganar 100% de su inversión para hacer trading me explico deposita 200 y te regalo 200 tendrás 400$ para hacer trading en uno de los mejores brokers regulados del mundo enviame al privado si estás interesado
https://www.kgen.quest/invite/68070734 tenemos nueva tarea 6$ por oir audios tengo video de la primera tarea en mi canal ojo todavia no han pagado la primera pero no cuesta nada hacerla
https://billsonchain.io/register?ref=CBEEEEF7 este airdrop te va pagar por subir facturas del mercado asi que aprovecha sali este mes
https://xreign.app/login?ref=LNKVD2LE nuevo airdrop aprovechen facil de hacer se viene video
no lo hagan si te envian los usdc pero son falsos una copia te llegan a tu truswallet pero no los puedes intercambiar o pasar a otro exchange no tiene riesgo pero no valen nada asi que cuidados cuando vallan a intercambiar usdt o usdc siempre use wallet de exzchange nuncas trusawallet o coinbanse que son las que mas usan para esa estafa
https://bscscan.com/address/0xe05c25a68894e478c0ecc5d9f5bf84ba15b5a499 prueba
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @GIPI182. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Genera ingresos por internet” (@GIPI182), 130 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GIPI182.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.