Would you rock the duck kicks or leave ‘em on the shelf? 👟💨
😁111🔥51👍28❤17👀7

Channel
@grafunmeme
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,920,399subscribers
-28,756 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002215185497 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grafunmeme |
| Description | Gra-Gra!👀 Technical support: @GraSupport https://linktr.ee/grafunmeme |
| Created | 22 August 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grafunmeme |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 1,920,399 | -5,057 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 1,925,456 | -4,513 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:23 | 1,929,969 | -2,702 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:21 | 1,932,671 | -7,400 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 1,940,071 | -2,400 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 1,942,471 | -4,119 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 1,946,590 | -2,565 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 1,949,155 | first reading |
419 posts held, back to 22 August 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3,700 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 419 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4,293 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 1,640 | 38.2% | |
| 👍 | 1,062 | 24.7% | |
| 🔥 | 661 | 15.4% | |
| ❤ | 630 | 14.7% | |
| 👀 | 59 | 1.37% | |
| 😱 | 42 | 0.978% | |
| 👌 | 33 | 0.769% | |
| ❤🔥 | 29 | 0.676% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 0.489% | |
| 🤗 | 20 | 0.466% | |
| ⚡ | 16 | 0.373% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 0.326% | |
| 😎 | 12 | 0.28% | |
| 🫡 | 12 | 0.28% | |
| 🤯 | 11 | 0.256% | |
| 🐳 | 10 | 0.233% | |
| 😘 | 8 | 0.186% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 0.14% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.07% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.07% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.023% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 414 of the 419 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 506,830reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 419 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2024 to 10 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grafunmeme. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 419 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 August 2024 to 10 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Would you rock the duck kicks or leave ‘em on the shelf? 👟💨
😁111🔥51👍28❤17👀7
All minted out! ⚡️⚡️⚡️You crushed it! Awesome, so we didn’t even have a time to post, and the mint was already finished. Lightning fast. Time to nap and take care of your ducks. Now you are available for trading them. Good duck!🐥 GRA Power💥
🔥65😁51❤29🤯5👍2
You guys are incredible — the hype and support have been way beyond what we expected 💚 We want everything to go smoothly and flawlessly, our team is taking a bit more time. The mint opens on Tuesday (November, 4) at 12:00 (UTC), so your ducks don’t suffer in the process 😄 Stay tuned — we’re almost there: https://hotcraft.art/drop/graDuck_mint
❤59😁44👍15🔥10⚡5👀1🫡1
We’re done! Huge thanks to everyone for your warmth and participation and you’re absolutely incredible! 💫 Get your fastest fingers ready for the mint opening on the https://hotcraft.art/launchpad/graDuck. Mint will be announced very soon!
👍145❤49🔥40😁20⚡11👌7🤗6🤯1
We heard you. We’re extending our campaign for a few more hours. It’s not too late yet. 🤸Hurry up: https://hotcraft.art/launchpad/graDuck
😁70❤34🔥22👌12👀3
GraFun х TheOne x HOT are joining forces in a special campaign for our amazing community 💜 It’s simple — trade a bit, earn some points, and you’ll unlock an exclusive NFT that marks your place in this collab. Just hit $50+ in trading volume on TheOne, earn 1,000 points on GraFun, and install the HOT Wallet extension — that’s it! Once you’re in, you’ll get access to mint your limited NFT directly in HOT Wallet. 👉 …
👍421😁253🔥132❤108❤🔥18😱13👀12👏1
No sleep when rewards are on the line 📱 X |📱 Official website
😁179❤54👀34🔥22😱10👌6👍1
🐤We’re excited to join the BNB Chain Kickstart Program as an official Service Provider! Builders launching on BNB can now access: 🔹 Up to 100,000 GRA in community growth incentives 🔹 Marketing support for tokens migrating to DEX 🚀 Let’s launch memecoins fair, transparent and with Fun 👉 https://bnbchain.org/en/programs/kickstart Let’s Gra-Gra ⚡️ gra.fun/bsc/launch-token
😁129❤102🔥74👍41🤗14🫡11🥰9👌8
🐤 $BADAI Compensation Distribution Is Completed 🐤 🔥GraFun was built from day one to make memecoin launches safer, fairer, and more transparent. In one of the most challenging cases the space has seen, we stood by our values. ❕The compensation for the influenced users on $BADAI launch has been fully distributed. Following the outcome of the BADAI (now ARCH AI) DAO vote, compensation was distributed on the Base bloc…
😁80👍72❤30🔥13
🚨 Compensation Update for $BADAI Launch 🚨 The compensation is ready to be distributed on the Base blockchain, where the $ARCHAI token has officially launched. ❕However, due to the ongoing Ethereum Pectra upgrade, we are temporarily pausing distribution to ensure maximum security and avoid any technical risks that may arise during the upgrade process. 🔗 More on the upgrade Once the upgrade is complete and network …
😁53👍24❤14🔥12😱3
🐤 HOT Firedrop Incoming! 🐤 ⚡️Our GraFun village in HOT Wallet is bursting with $HOT — and we’re dropping it like it’s too hot to hold 🔥 Wanna grab your share?💰 Here’s the drill: 🫡 Join the GraFun TG channel ⚡️ Be a GraFun villager 👉Claim that HOT loot ⚡️ No bots, no fluff — just #GraGra, memes and $HOT⚡️
😁94👍64🔥34❤20😱8🎉5🦄3
⚡️Guess who? Drop your version👇 #GraGra #meme
😁65🔥25❤17👍12❤🔥5😱5👏2🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 419 posts we hold for @grafunmeme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 60,695 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@grafunmeme named 15 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
5 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GraFun” (@grafunmeme), 1,920,399 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grafunmeme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.