8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,806–16,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 03:42
16,819
-16
11 Aug 2026, 06:51
16,835
-19
10 Aug 2026, 06:07
16,854
-8
9 Aug 2026, 06:41
16,862
-9
8 Aug 2026, 07:51
16,871
-21
7 Aug 2026, 04:25
16,892
-17
6 Aug 2026, 02:18
16,909
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:48
16,909
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 18 November 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
11
Links
15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5,768 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,591
44.9%
❤
1,701
29.5%
🔥
944
16.4%
⚡
126
2.18%
👏
125
2.17%
🤔
98
1.70%
💯
52
0.902%
☃
32
0.555%
🎉
26
0.451%
🐳
25
0.433%
👀
15
0.26%
😁
13
0.225%
🤝
13
0.225%
🙏
3
0.052%
👌
2
0.035%
👎
2
0.035%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,768reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2024 to 4 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
42
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 16 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
35
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @range_finance. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 November 2024 to 4 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🧛 Vampire Attack: The SushiSwap Case 🩸
In 2020, SushiSwap launched a bold move against Uniswap, pulling over $800M in liquidity within days. How? By offering extra rewards (SUSHI tokens) to liquidity providers who migrated their funds. 🍣
💸 Key numbers:
• Almost $1B TVL drained from Uniswap to SushiSwap.
• Over 15,000 users joined SushiSwap during the attack.
• SushiSwap’s TVL skyrocketed from $0 to $1.5B in just a…
😎 January was packed with action! Here’s a quick recap:
🎙️ AMAs:
• Range Finance x FIVA: "DeFi on TON: Concentrated Liquidity and Yield Tokenization"
• Range Finance x PumpMeme: "Memecoins on DEXs: Liquidity Drivers or Passing Fad?"
🤝 Partnership:
• Range Finance x TonPad — building a stronger and more interconnected ecosystem on TON together.
Big steps as we continue building our DEX! 🚀
✈️ Channel | 💬Chat | ✖️X
💬 Only 1 hour left! ⏳
Be ready to join us for a discussion about "Memecoins on DEXs: Liquidity Drivers or Passing Fad?" 🚀
When: 22 January, 11:00 UTC
Where: Twitter Space
Speakers: KStasi / Frank / Rossinante
Catch you in the Space! 🎙
✈️ Channel | 💬Chat | ✖️X
🔊 Range Finance x PumpMeme AMA 🔊
🧠 Let’s settle the debate: «Memecoins on DEXs: Liquidity Drivers or Passing Fad?». Range Finance and PumpMeme will uncover the answer! 🌐
When: 22 January, 11:00 UTC
Where: Twitter Space
Speakers: KStasi / Frank / Rossinante
Set your reminders and get your questions ready — we’ll break it all down! 💥
✈️ Channel | 💬Chat | ✖️X
⏳ The wait is almost over — 1 hour to go! 🔥
Join us for a deep dive into "DeFi on TON: Concentrated Liquidity and Yield Tokenization" with FIVA 💡
When: 16 January, 13:00 UTC
Where: Twitter Space
Speakers: KStasi / Andrei / Rossinante
Don’t miss this chance to explore the world of DeFi on TON and ask your burning questions live 🎙️
Catch you in the Space! 🎧
🎧 Range Finance x FIVA AMA 🎧
💬 This time, we’re teaming up with FIVA to talk about "DeFi on TON: Concentrated Liquidity and Yield Tokenization" 💡
When: 16 January 13:00 UTC
Where: Twitter Space
Speakers: KStasi / Andrei / Rossinante
Got questions about DeFi? Share them in the comments and be ready to join us live! 🎙️
Catch you in the Space! 🎧
✈️ Channel | 💬Chat | ✖️X
🚀 Range Finance x TonPad 🚀
We’re excited to announce our partnership with TonPad, the first TMA launchpad in the TON ecosystem! 💎
🌐 TonPad revolutionizes the way users interact with crypto projects, offering seamless access to ICOs, private, public rounds and free airdrops—all within a fun, engaging environment.
🎮 With its unique RocketPoints system and missions, TonPad combines investment opportunities with a ga…
⏳ The countdown begins — just 1 hour to go! 🔥
Join us for an exciting AMA as we explore What Makes Memecoins Successful Across Chains – Lessons for TON. Don’t miss the conversation! 🚀
Where: Twitter space
Speakers: KStasi / GraDaddy / Rossinante
See you on stage! 🎙️✨
✈️ Channel | 💬Chat | ✖️X
👍73❤35🔥26☃5
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @range_finance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Over 3M unique users have interacted with DEXs on TON! 🚀
Have you ever used a DEX on TON?
Yes, I’m one of them! 🤩58%
Not yet, but planning to try 🤔21%
What’s a DEX? 🤨21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2024 to 4 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 662,010 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Range Finance” (@range_finance), 16,819 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/range_finance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.