Photo, posted without a caption
😁289👍83💯39😢21😐15🗿8❤7🙉5

Channel
@uwon_coin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
29,240subscribers
-179 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002054092905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uwon_coin |
| Description | UWON Memcoin UWON chat - https://t.me/chat_uwon |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uwon_coin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 29,240 | -25 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 29,265 | -18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 29,283 | -32 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 29,315 | -28 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 29,343 | -22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 29,365 | -13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 29,378 | -41 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 29,419 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 29,419 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,924 reactions across 19 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 810 | 27.7% | |
| 😁 | 695 | 23.8% | |
| ❤ | 367 | 12.6% | |
| 🔥 | 301 | 10.3% | |
| 🥱 | 251 | 8.58% | |
| 🍌 | 56 | 1.92% | |
| 😴 | 54 | 1.85% | |
| 😢 | 47 | 1.61% | |
| 💯 | 42 | 1.44% | |
| 🤨 | 37 | 1.27% | |
| 🗿 | 33 | 1.13% | |
| 🤔 | 31 | 1.06% | |
| 🤷♂ | 25 | 0.855% | |
| 🙉 | 16 | 0.547% | |
| 😐 | 15 | 0.513% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 0.479% | |
| 🏆 | 13 | 0.445% | |
| 💊 | 13 | 0.445% | |
| 🌭 | 9 | 0.308% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 0.308% | |
| 18 further kinds | 86 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,924reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2024 to 14 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
😁289👍83💯39😢21😐15🗿8❤7🙉5
Gra 🪙
😁137❤78🔥40👍20👾6💘6👏4🍾3
HOT MOON - Battle of the Villages 🤯 1) Join UWON Village 🧑🏿🌾 2) Paint pixels on the board and farm MOON tokens (one paint - $0.02) 3) If UWON Village wins, get x3 $MOON Let the battle begin 🪙🪙🪙
👍102😴54🔥40❤28🏆10🥱9😁8🙈6
🤪$1.2m+ Airdrop от Double Dog! 🤪 We ran the most huge airdrop in the $HOT ecosystem!🔥A week after launch, it's time to recap: 🦴163427 participated in airdrop $DD 🦴1.29m $HOT from launchpad + 50k $HOT from NFT sale were burned! 🦴The most traded NFT collection of all time on NEAR! $1.3m+ trading volume! 🦴333 333 333 $DD were distributed to the community for $HOT 🦴The CLAIM started with $85m FDV, where we started buyba…
👍76🤨37🗿21🥱17🍌12🥰8🌭5👏5
🔥 Claim 🔥 15000 HOT Firedrop $TIME Village $TIME is a memecoin on Solana 🪙 that represents the ultimate scarcity and value of time. Rumor has it that there will be a big trading contest soon ❗Always DYOR (do your own reserch) HOT Wallet only provides tools for working with crypto
👍75❤13🍌10🔥9
Who earned the title of UWON of the past week? 🪙
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤41👍10🤔8🔥4
We have been informed that Polkadot does not know how to spend money properly. 🥲 A new candidate for UWON of the week? 🪙
😁80❤16👍11🤔6🍌2👀2🔥2🥱2
🪙 We are introducing a new award - UWON of the week. Who else deserves our award? 🏆
😁125🔥41🤷♂23👍20❤15🍌7💔4🤔4
What's in the box? 🪙 Ask it on the BOXY channel 🔥 Claim Firedrop
👍86🔥35😢26🍌8❤5🥱4🌚2💔2
🔥Airdrop 1000 HOT by Oriole Insights🔥 Claim your drop Balance $1+ / 0.1 $HOT 🔥 per user Don't forget about special activity with prize pool 90 000+ $ORI: 🦴Sign up on Oriole Insights with this link: https://bit.ly/4eHc9Es 🦴Get the benefits: Early-Bird badge and 300 $ORI 🔥(special for DD) 🦴Go to "ROI" and predict. DoubleDog | Chat | Twitter | Web
👍59🔥9❤7💔3👾2💋2😁2
2 days left 🪙
🥱120🔥29😁17❤14👍10🤪6🤯3💊2
UWON pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @uwon_coin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who earned the title of UWON of the past week? 🪙
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2024 to 14 October 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 271,450 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UWON” (@uwon_coin), 29,240 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uwon_coin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.