Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GR 2.0

@gr2hub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

616subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002366877110
TypeChannel
Username@gr2hub
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gr2hub

Growth

6166 Aug 2026, 20:47 — 616 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:17 — 616 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:477 Aug 2026, 10:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 615–617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 10:17616no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:47616first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
108.7%
avg views ÷ 616 subscribers
Avg views / post
669
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held16 (14 May 202630 July 2026)
Views total3,347
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

195 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8443.1%
5829.7%
👍2412.3%
🎉157.69%
💅42.05%
👌31.54%
❤‍🔥21.03%
😭21.03%
🤩21.03%
🤷10.513%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gr2hub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 21:11 UTC318 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Спасибо всем, кто пришел ♥️

👍76🔥6

29 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC443 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔥 GR 2.0 #13 — Новый сезон (уже завтра)! 🎤 @egorshishkovets и @agdust с докладами 🍻 Вкусности, напитки и конечно же пиво от @poneslosbar_vrn 🤩 Занимайте место поближе к сцене; располагайтесь поудобнее; подумайте, как бы задать лучший вопрос; готовьтесь к розыгрышу призов и afterparty 🗓 Четверг, 30 июня, с 19:00, на Пушкинской 5 🔥 Делаем воронежский движ для всех и каждого. Ждём вас. 📲 @gr2hub

7🔥6

24 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC556 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔥 GR 2.0 #13 — Новый сезон! Уже совсем скоро! 🗓 Четверг, 30 июля, с 19:00 📍 @poneslosbar_vrn, Пушкинская 5 🗺 Ссылка на карту 🚪 Вход свободный @egorshishkovets и @agdust на микрофоне с двумя переплетающимися докладами про AI и open source. 1️⃣ От Naive RAG до ReAct-агента. 2️⃣ Код, свобода и кризисы. Давайте снова соберемся и проведем этот летний вечер вместе. Зовите друзей, коллег, знакомых, близких — познакомьте

🔥10

16 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC740 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Придете 30го❓

  1. 🔥 Да65%
  2. 🙈 Нет35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

16 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,290 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔥 GR 2.0 #13 — Новый сезон! Мы успели немного отдохнуть, даже слегка соскучились. Надеемся это обоюдно. Врываемся с новыми силами! Ждем вас в знакомом месте, в привычное время. 🗓 Четверг, 30 июля, 19:00 📍 @poneslosbar_vrn, Пушкинская 5 🗺 Ссылка на карту 19:00 — 🤝 знакомимся, 🍺 берём напитки, 🥩 ужинаем 20:00 — 🎤 два доклада 21:00 — 💬 дискуссии, нетворкинг, afterparty 1️⃣ @egorshishkovets: От Naive RAG до ReAct-аге

🔥14

14 Jul 2026, 12:06 UTC516 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🎤 Call for Papers открыт! Мы уже собираем программу нового сезона митапов. Если у вас есть тема, кейс, факап, интересная технология или просто желание выступить — несите! 🔥 Пишите в личку: @bidlo / @wldwldcrd / @stas_on_3 Не стесняйтесь — мы открыты к любым темам. И небольшой дисклеймер: заявка не означает, что вы попадете на ближайший митап. Мы собираем темы заранее и группируем их по тематике, чтобы делать цель

👌3

11 Jun 2026, 09:56 UTC861 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gr20funPhoto

🔥 GR.fun: Круиз 🛥 ☀️ Лето, жара, и мы знаем что вам нужно! Приглашаем отправиться в плавание, это не регулярный митап - это глоток свободы для души. Воды воронежского моря и закатное солнце, плавно сменяемое видом ночного города. 📅 25 июня, четверг, 19:00 📍 Пристань улица Панфилова, 1Г 🎟 Билет — 2500₽ Традиционный All-Inclusive: 🍺 Пять бутылочек холодненького 🍽 Осетинские пироги, 🍕 пицца ☕️ Чай, кофе, вода 🕚 Четыр

🔥13

10 Jun 2026, 13:59 UTC607 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @rdclr_homePhoto

Не стройте планы на 23 июня — мы забираем слот под себя 🦆 Нейросети уже стали частью рабочих процессов, но стало ли от этого проще? Где AI реально помогает, а где только создает новые проблемы? И что вообще происходит с ролями, экспертизой и командами в веб-продакшене? Вместе с Partner's Club проведем в Воронеже конференцию «AI: взгляд из команды» 🧤 Вас ждут короткие выступления от специалистов разных направлений

🔥7💅43🤷1

10 Jun 2026, 13:59 UTC486 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Наши друзья из 🔥 Red Collar раскачивают Воронежскую AI сцену 23го июня Приходите послушать и обменяться опытом 😎

4🔥3❤‍🔥2

2 Jun 2026, 07:51 UTC683 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

🔥 Отлично отметили юбилейный GR 2.0 #12! Спасибо всем, кто пришёл и сделал этот вечер таким классным ❤️ Ловите слайды докладчиков ✨

9🔥7

28 May 2026, 16:19 UTC891 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @greenrus_aiPhoto

В Воронеже есть замечательное ИТ-сообщество Глубокий Рефакторинг 2.0. Каждый месяц в баре проходят митапы, которые собирают больше 100 человек. Люди слушают доклады, едят, пьют, общаются - атмосфера прекрасная. Делается все чисто на энтузиазме организаторов, и получаются очень крутые ивенты. На позапрошлом митапе, один из организаторов - Стас, поделился идеей - сделать телеграм-канал с лентой постов из каналов ребят

👍146

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @gr2hub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTCAnonymous Poll95 voters

Придете 30го❓

  1. 🔥 Да65%
  2. 🙈 Нет35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 234,793 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GR 2.0” (@gr2hub), 616 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gr2hub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.