Спасибо всем, кто пришел ♥️
👍7❤6🔥6

Channel
@gr2hub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
616subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002366877110 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gr2hub |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gr2hub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 616 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 616 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (14 May 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,347 |
| Reactions total | 59 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
195 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 84 | 43.1% | |
| ❤ | 58 | 29.7% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 12.3% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 7.69% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 2.05% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.54% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.03% | |
| 🤷 | 1 | 0.513% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gr2hub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Спасибо всем, кто пришел ♥️
👍7❤6🔥6
🔥 GR 2.0 #13 — Новый сезон (уже завтра)! 🎤 @egorshishkovets и @agdust с докладами 🍻 Вкусности, напитки и конечно же пиво от @poneslosbar_vrn 🤩 Занимайте место поближе к сцене; располагайтесь поудобнее; подумайте, как бы задать лучший вопрос; готовьтесь к розыгрышу призов и afterparty 🗓 Четверг, 30 июня, с 19:00, на Пушкинской 5 🔥 Делаем воронежский движ для всех и каждого. Ждём вас. 📲 @gr2hub
❤7🔥6
🔥 GR 2.0 #13 — Новый сезон! Уже совсем скоро! 🗓 Четверг, 30 июля, с 19:00 📍 @poneslosbar_vrn, Пушкинская 5 🗺 Ссылка на карту 🚪 Вход свободный @egorshishkovets и @agdust на микрофоне с двумя переплетающимися докладами про AI и open source. 1️⃣ От Naive RAG до ReAct-агента. 2️⃣ Код, свобода и кризисы. Давайте снова соберемся и проведем этот летний вечер вместе. Зовите друзей, коллег, знакомых, близких — познакомьте …
🔥10
Придете 30го❓
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
🔥 GR 2.0 #13 — Новый сезон! Мы успели немного отдохнуть, даже слегка соскучились. Надеемся это обоюдно. Врываемся с новыми силами! Ждем вас в знакомом месте, в привычное время. 🗓 Четверг, 30 июля, 19:00 📍 @poneslosbar_vrn, Пушкинская 5 🗺 Ссылка на карту 19:00 — 🤝 знакомимся, 🍺 берём напитки, 🥩 ужинаем 20:00 — 🎤 два доклада 21:00 — 💬 дискуссии, нетворкинг, afterparty 1️⃣ @egorshishkovets: От Naive RAG до ReAct-аге…
🔥14
🎤 Call for Papers открыт! Мы уже собираем программу нового сезона митапов. Если у вас есть тема, кейс, факап, интересная технология или просто желание выступить — несите! 🔥 Пишите в личку: @bidlo / @wldwldcrd / @stas_on_3 Не стесняйтесь — мы открыты к любым темам. И небольшой дисклеймер: заявка не означает, что вы попадете на ближайший митап. Мы собираем темы заранее и группируем их по тематике, чтобы делать цель…
👌3
Posted without readable text
🔥8
🔥 GR.fun: Круиз 🛥 ☀️ Лето, жара, и мы знаем что вам нужно! Приглашаем отправиться в плавание, это не регулярный митап - это глоток свободы для души. Воды воронежского моря и закатное солнце, плавно сменяемое видом ночного города. 📅 25 июня, четверг, 19:00 📍 Пристань улица Панфилова, 1Г 🎟 Билет — 2500₽ Традиционный All-Inclusive: 🍺 Пять бутылочек холодненького 🍽 Осетинские пироги, 🍕 пицца ☕️ Чай, кофе, вода 🕚 Четыр…
🔥13
Не стройте планы на 23 июня — мы забираем слот под себя 🦆 Нейросети уже стали частью рабочих процессов, но стало ли от этого проще? Где AI реально помогает, а где только создает новые проблемы? И что вообще происходит с ролями, экспертизой и командами в веб-продакшене? Вместе с Partner's Club проведем в Воронеже конференцию «AI: взгляд из команды» 🧤 Вас ждут короткие выступления от специалистов разных направлений …
🔥7💅4❤3🤷1
Наши друзья из 🔥 Red Collar раскачивают Воронежскую AI сцену 23го июня Приходите послушать и обменяться опытом 😎
❤4🔥3❤🔥2
🔥 Отлично отметили юбилейный GR 2.0 #12! Спасибо всем, кто пришёл и сделал этот вечер таким классным ❤️ Ловите слайды докладчиков ✨
❤9🔥7
В Воронеже есть замечательное ИТ-сообщество Глубокий Рефакторинг 2.0. Каждый месяц в баре проходят митапы, которые собирают больше 100 человек. Люди слушают доклады, едят, пьют, общаются - атмосфера прекрасная. Делается все чисто на энтузиазме организаторов, и получаются очень крутые ивенты. На позапрошлом митапе, один из организаторов - Стас, поделился идеей - сделать телеграм-канал с лентой постов из каналов ребят…
👍14❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @gr2hub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Придете 30го❓
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 234,793 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GR 2.0” (@gr2hub), 616 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gr2hub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.