Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 10 of the 10 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @podolskadm. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Views per post sit far above this size band
105,000 average views per post against 89,753 subscribers — an engagement rate of 116.9%. Across the 8,315 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,997 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.08% and 20.8%, with a median of 10.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
167 of 167 published in the window (7 exact, 160 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
17,522,656
Mature posts only
131.4% over 73 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source · err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
64 measurements spanning 94 days, net -10,743. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85,953–101,559 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 00:37
89,015
-259
8 Nov 2026, 11:59
89,274
-190
7 Nov 2026, 04:06
89,464
-127
6 Nov 2026, 04:58
89,591
-162
5 Nov 2026, 03:11
89,753
-112
4 Nov 2026, 06:08
89,865
-276
3 Nov 2026, 08:50
90,141
-251
2 Nov 2026, 07:31
90,392
-136
1 Nov 2026, 09:26
90,528
-234
31 Oct 2026, 06:36
90,762
-103
30 Oct 2026, 06:31
90,865
-258
29 Oct 2026, 06:41
91,123
-268
28 Oct 2026, 07:09
91,391
-295
27 Oct 2026, 03:48
91,686
-114
26 Oct 2026, 00:19
91,800
-118
25 Oct 2026, 01:19
91,918
-462
23 Oct 2026, 22:04
92,380
-134
22 Oct 2026, 21:37
92,514
-117
21 Oct 2026, 18:36
92,631
+4,877
20 Oct 2026, 12:20
87,754
first reading
Engagement
525 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
106.7%
avg views ÷ 89,015 subscribers
Avg views / post
95,000
170 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.214%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
170
of 525 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 168 of 170 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
525 (7 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
16,147,420
Reactions total
34,520
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 18:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈39,600
Videos
≈1,880
Links
≈2,930
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18m 52s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
94,434 reactions across 492 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
39,029
41.3%
👍
38,298
40.6%
❤
16,949
17.9%
👏
80
0.085%
💯
60
0.064%
👎
9
0.01%
🕊
9
0.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 492 of the 525 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94,434 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 525 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 170 posts held from the last 30 days (3.53%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔥 Шахматные турниры в Подольске: четвёртый этап школьной лиги на финишной прямой
В Подольске кипят шахматные баталии — идёт развязка четвёртого этапа школьной лиги. На турнир съехались команды всех групп: каждая школа выставила пятёрку игроков, причём по правилам в составе обязательно должна быть хотя бы одна девушка. Партии идут в формате быстрых шахмат — 10 минут плюс 5 секунд за ход, так что каждая игра укладывае…
Путешествие сквозь века: юные иконописцы из Подольска в Спасо‑Андрониковом монастыре ⛪️
Воспитанники иконописного класса воскресной школы Троицкого кафедрального собора Подольска вместе с преподавателем Мариной Нис побывали в древней московской обители — Спасо‑Андрониковом монастыре. Главной точкой маршрута стал Музей древнерусской культуры и искусства имени Андрея Рублёва: ребята увидели иконы XIII–XIV веков, колле…
Волейбольная Школьная лига в Подольске: группа «В» зажгла на площадке 🏐
На матчах Подольской школьной лиги сошлись команды из школы № 1 Климовска, школы имени Героя России А. Г. Монетова и школы № 12. Среди юношей сильнее всех проявила себя команда школы имени Монетова — она выиграла обе свои встречи. У девушек лучший результат показала школа № 12, а волейболистки из школы № 1 Климовска сейчас переживают этап обновл…
ТЭКвандо» из Подольска — в финале КВН 😄
В ДК имени Лепсе прошёл полуфинал региональной лиги КВН «Подольск — территория юмора», приуроченный к Международному дню КВН. За выход в финал сражались четыре команды — из Подольска, Серпухова, Москвы, а перед зрителями также выступили инклюзивная команда «Не стой на месте!» и юные юмористы из Троицка.
Победу забрала подольская команда «ТЭКвандо» из Технико‑экономического ко…
🎉 Доброе утро, Подольск! Пусть день будет ярким и продуктивным!
Сегодня, 10 ноября, — День сотрудника органов внутренних дел: поздравляем тех, кто бережёт наш покой!
По народному календарю — день памяти святой Параскевы: если туман — жди оттепели. Погода радует: +5 °C, лёгкий ветер, атмосферное давление в норме.
Фиджитал‑центр на Рабочей улице готов уже на 60% 🔥
Объект возводят в рамках госпрограммы «Спорт Подмосковья» — его планируют ввести в эксплуатацию до конца года. Рядом с центром, неподалёку от жилых домов и Подольского технико‑экономического колледжа, появятся футбольное поле, площадки для стритбола и воркаут‑зона. Внутри разместят компьютерный класс и пространства для занятий в виртуальной реальности.
Особенность …
«Светлый город» в Кузнечиках: микрорайон становится светлее 💡
В выходные в Кузнечиках продолжили обновлять уличное освещение: ставят фонари и тянут провода. Работы идут в Армейском и Флотском проездах, а также на улице Генерала Варенникова — в том числе рядом со школой и детским садом.
Программа «Светлый город» работает в Подмосковье с 2017 года: её цель — сделать улицы комфортнее и безопаснее по вечерам.
Представители Тимирязевской академии встретились с учениками аграрных классов школы № 29 Подольска 🧑🎓
Профессор Ольга Соловьёва, доцент Екатерина Жукова и доцент Ольга Селицкая поговорили о современных задачах животноводства, биотехнологиях и востребованных профессиях, а также рассказали школьникам про поступление в вуз: какие предметы сдавать на ЕГЭ и как получить дополнительные баллы. Профессор Соловьёва отметила…
В ДК «Металлург» прошёл VIII фестиваль творчества «Шанс есть у каждого из нас» 🎤
Более 150 участников 30–80 лет из Москвы и Подмосковья — в том числе активисты проектов «Активное долголетие» и «Московское долголетие» — представили свои таланты. В программе было 9 хореографических номеров, 8 вокальных выступлений и рекордные 32 работы на выставке декоративно‑прикладного творчества и изобразительного искусства, а в пе…
Доброе утро, Подольск! ☀️
9 ноября — понедельник, и новая ноябрьская неделя начинается сразу с нескольких важных дат: отмечают День СОБР, стартует Неделя качества в России, а в православном календаре — день памяти преподобного Нестора Летописца.
По народным приметам, утренний иней сулит морозы, а туман — потепление.
🔥 Судейский семинар по универсальному бою: ребята прокачали навыки в Подольске
В школе № 32 прошёл обучающий семинар от Федерации универсального боя Москвы — в нём поучаствовали 23 судьи и стажёры. Занятие состояло из теории (новые правила, баллы, жестикуляция, спорные моменты) и практики: навыки отрабатывали на спаррингах с юными бойцами.
Цель обучения — сделать судейство объективнее, а турниры — безопаснее для сп…
«Магия клавиш: Мария Кальянова покорила Дубровицы!» 🎶
В малом зале КПЦ «Дубровицы» прогремел сольный концерт 25‑летней пианистки Марии Кальяновой — выпускницы Московской консерватории, которая с трёх лет идёт рука об руку с музыкой: первые уроки ей дала мама‑пианистка, а дальше были музыкальная школа, училище и консерватория. Выступить в Дубровицах Марию пригласила её сокурсница Дарья Богданова — уроженка Подольска,…
❤2👏2💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 525 posts we hold for @gorod4967. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@gorod4967 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 September 2026
Most recent edit
25 September 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Подольск | События | Подслушано @Podolsk_podslushal · 36,386 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 September 2026
Григорий Артамонов | Подольск @GrArtamonov · 26,031 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
ПОДОЛЬСК | СОБЫТИЯ | НОВОСТИ @Podolsk_nov · 22,529 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 September 2026
Типичный Подольск @tipichniypodolsk · 28,276 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 9 September 2026
Официальный Подольск @podolskadm · 29,575 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 7 September 2026
Новости правда @newsprav_da · 174,008 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Подольск 24\7” (@gorod4967), 89,015 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gorod4967.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.