8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,826–4,893 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 07:39
4,834
-15
24 Aug 2026, 06:16
4,849
-2
20 Aug 2026, 23:48
4,851
-21
17 Aug 2026, 23:46
4,872
-3
14 Aug 2026, 14:54
4,875
-10
11 Aug 2026, 05:15
4,885
+20
7 Aug 2026, 20:32
4,865
-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:47
4,866
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.61%
avg views ÷ 4,834 subscribers
Avg views / post
465
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
6 (30 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
2,788
Reactions total
17
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
17 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12
70.6%
⚡
2
11.8%
🔥
2
11.8%
✍
1
5.88%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Брэду Питту 62. И, кажется, сейчас он интереснее, чем когда был самым красивым мужчиной Голливуда
Новое большое интервью Брэда Питта для Esquire получилось совсем не про кино. Вернее, кино там есть, но гораздо интереснее то, как один из самых известных людей планеты говорит о возрасте, алкоголе, одиночестве, потерях и желании продолжать жить.
Питт неожиданно признался, что снова начал пить.
После развода с Анджелино…
Медиакапитал стал дороже профессии
Недавно Джесси Кейв, сыгравшая Лаванду Браун в фильмах о Гарри Поттере, призналась, что за год заработала на OnlyFans больше, чем за всю свою актёрскую карьеру.
Причём речь идёт вовсе не о том контенте, о котором многие сразу подумали. Она публиковала видео с расчёсыванием волос, записывала ASMR-ролики и общалась со своей аудиторией. Но интересно здесь совсем не это.
Самое интересн…
Лето 2026 года преподнесло один из самых неожиданных модных сюрпризов: люди массово отказались от босоножек в пользу сапог.
Причём речь идёт не об осени, а о жаре под тридцать градусов. И, судя по всему, этот тренд только набирает обороты.
Этим летом дизайнеры и стилисты неожиданно объявили сапоги главным предметом гардероба. Да, именно сапоги. В разгар жары, когда все вокруг носят сандалии, шлёпанцы и кеды.
Самое у…
Кажется, пришло время признать: красный стал новым чёрным.
Долгие годы нас учили относиться к красному как к чему-то особенному. Красное платье - для важного вечера, красные туфли - для смелого образа, красная помада - для особого случая. Красный всегда был заявлением.
Но индустрия моды решила переписать эти правила.
Сегодня дизайнеры предлагают воспринимать красный так же, как мы воспринимаем чёрный, белый, серый и…
Илон Маск дал большое интервью The Economist, и больше всего меня удивило даже не то, что он говорил об искусственном интеллекте, а то, насколько спокойно он рассуждает о мире после появления суперинтеллекта.
Несколько мыслей, которые показались мне самыми интересными.
Во-первых, Маск уверен, что уже в течение ближайших пяти лет искусственный интеллект превзойдёт совокупный интеллект всего человечества. По его слова…
Увидел интересное исследование Business of Fashion и хочу коротко поделиться своими выводами
Ещё несколько лет назад никто не обращал внимания на ярлыки на одежде. Максимум люди смотрели на бренд, цену и страну производства. Сегодня всё изменилось.
Покупатели буквально изучают состав ткани так же внимательно, как раньше читали состав продуктов в супермаркете. И это один из самых интересных трендов последних лет.
Ран…
❤4✍1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @showoff_kz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Подольск 24\7 @gorod4967 · 97,450 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SHOWOFF” (@showoff_kz), 4,834 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/showoff_kz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.