Channel
@gorlov_martech
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
124subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002946993776 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gorlov_martech |
| Description | На практике исследую тему управления смыслами в маркетинге и бизнесе в эпоху ИИ. Строю Oblako.ai. Эксперт в B2B-маркетинге. |
| Created | 10 September 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gorlov_martech |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 124 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 124 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 123 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
266 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 99 | 37.2% | |
| 👍 | 59 | 22.2% | |
| ❤ | 52 | 19.5% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 7.52% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 4.51% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 4.51% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 1.88% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 1.50% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.752% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.376% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2025 to 1 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gorlov_martech. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 September 2025 to 1 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Крутейшее обновление вышло в нашем продукте — лендинги теперь создаются за 5 минут по цене чашки кофе! Всем кто захочет потестировать, поделиться фидбеком и использовать для реальных задач бизнеса — пишите в лс.
❤🔥5👍4🔥4
ТАДАААААМММ 🎉 ДОЖДАЛИСЬ! Генерация лендингов заехала в Oblako.ai 🔥 Больше не нужно искать дизайнеров, копирайтеров, платить 100-500к, ждать месяц, а то и больше, потом еще правки собирать… А вам всего-то нужно было трафик на лендинг запустить 🙂… вчера) Теперь за несколько минут можно собрать красивый, функциональный лендинг в Oblako.ai. (генерация лендингов доступна на шаге формирования УТП) 🔥 среднее время генера…
🔥15❤7🤝4👍2
хорошее от моих коллег про управление контекстом в ИИ-эпоху
Промты — не главное в ИИ-эру. У вас уже есть Сontext Manager? Качество результатов ИИ на 100% зависит от качества, полноты и консистентности входного контекста, поэтому на наш взгляд главная и самая ценная функция маркетолога сегодня — Менеджер контекста (Context Manager), а не сваха разных ИИшек, которая пытается в десяти инструментах сгенерить “что-нибудь интересненькое”. Context Manager — это новая стратегическа…
🔥7👍6💯4❤2🤔1
🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤 🔤🔤 Как исследователь смыслов в бизнесе и маркетинге, не могу пройти мимо смены Nike эпохального слогана Just do it и не разобраться, что это значит. Делюсь своими мыслями. 1️⃣ Just do it — один из лучших рекламных слоганов 20 века — переосмысленная агентством Wieden+Kennedy фраза безбашенного преступника Гэри Гилмора, сказанная им перед расстрелом (Let’s do it). Теперь слоган будет Why do it? 2️⃣ Just do …
🔥14💯8👍6
Он — не пожарный, он — герой Свободы. Свободы выбора дорог и направлений. Герой отважной рыцарской породы, Горящий светом будущих свершений. Но чем ему гореть? Где те свершенья, Что силу каждым утром прибавляют? Что сделать здесь? Сейчас. Для вдохновенья. Какие цели в сердце Жар вселяют? Спасать и жертвовать? Держаться? Не сдаваться? Рискнуть собой, другого выручая? От минуса к нулю приподниматься? Спасать других, …
🔥16👏5❤3💔2
жизнь маркетинга)
😁2
это смешно) — чтоб скЭпсис вас покинул) еще серии тут
😁8🔥4👍3
Вайб-маркетинг. Эффектно или эффективно? В прошлый раз мы игриво потыкали вайб-маркетинг острой палочкой и похихикали над ним, думая, что всерьёз его никто не воспринимает. Но даже за прошедшие две недели в довольно уважаемых в сфере маркетинга медиа вышло несколько статей о том, что вайб-маркетинг — это точно наше спасение, и все должны броситься осваивать промт-инжиниринг. Ну штош… Поскольку мы всё это прошли при…
🔥11👍9❤6👏2
10 заповедений современного (ИИ) маркетинга Здесь и здесь рассказал, почему ИИ + классический маркетинг — это пока еще очень далеко от современного технологичного маркетинга. Делюсь своим видением 10 ключевых принципов, как реально поставить ИИ на службу маркетолога. 1. Уникальный контекст бизнеса — главное ядро. Это главный генетический код компании, её ДНК: кто вы, зачем вы, в чем ваша ценность и уникальность. Эт…
👍13🔥8❤7
Значит, слушайте, ребята. Многие наверняка знают про вайб-кодинг. Это когда разработчики думают, что наступил волшебный мир и кодить больше не нужно, а нужно только хороводить ИИшки. Ага… Главные заповеди там: Скорость. Калифорнийский вайб. Надежда на чудо. Но есть ведь и вайб-маркетинг. Там всё как под копирку. 1️⃣ Каждый нормальный разработчик знает вайб-кодинг, как старый добрый говнокодинг и иллюзий особо не …
🔥9❤6😁5👍3
ПОЧЕМУ ИИ + МАРКЕТИНГ ≠ МАРТЕК Зоопарк понятий маркетинга 🦜🐘🦁🦒 Предлагаю сыграть в игру. Каждый уважающий себя маркетолог впитал эти понятия с молоком матери — бренд, миссия, видение, лидер, позиционирование, экспертность, вовлечённость, лояльность. Но что означают все эти волшебные слова? Помните, как Иван Андреевич еще 200 лет назад писал про маркетинг? Когда в товарищах согласья нет, На лад их дело не пойдёт, И…
👍6😁5❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @gorlov_martech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 30,760 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маркетинг. Бизнес. Смыслы. Канал Сергея Горлова.” (@gorlov_martech), 124 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gorlov_martech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.