文章PDF版本,欢迎同志们在墙内外广泛转发
👍28❤4🔥1

Channel
@gongrenjiefang
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
660subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001319694908 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gongrenjiefang |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gongrenjiefang |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 660 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 662 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 656 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 652 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 654 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 657 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 657 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
200 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 171 | 85.5% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 6.00% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 3.50% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 2.50% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 1.50% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.5% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2021 to 29 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
文章PDF版本,欢迎同志们在墙内外广泛转发
👍28❤4🔥1
解放报 pinned «为什么机会主义者要把资产阶级的白纸说成红旗(二) 为什么机会主义者要把资产阶级的白纸说成红旗(三) 为什么机会主义者要把资产阶级的白纸说成红旗(四) 本文原定两篇,因全文较长,最终分多篇发出,全文目录如下: 一、“白纸抗议”的政治意义 二、谁在举白纸 三、国内外资产阶级政府对白纸抗议的态度 四、小资民主派是怎样歪曲事实、把自由派说成民主派,并要求工人为此当炮灰的? 1.运动的划分 2.资产阶级的“列宁道路”,小资产阶级的“今朝” (1)革命性质 (2)革命阶级 五、无产阶级应该怎样看待这一系列运动和“左翼”中的争论?…»
为什么机会主义者要把资产阶级的白纸说成红旗(二) 为什么机会主义者要把资产阶级的白纸说成红旗(三) 为什么机会主义者要把资产阶级的白纸说成红旗(四) 本文原定两篇,因全文较长,最终分多篇发出,全文目录如下: 一、“白纸抗议”的政治意义 二、谁在举白纸 三、国内外资产阶级政府对白纸抗议的态度 四、小资民主派是怎样歪曲事实、把自由派说成民主派,并要求工人为此当炮灰的? 1.运动的划分 2.资产阶级的“列宁道路”,小资产阶级的“今朝” (1)革命性质 (2)革命阶级 五、无产阶级应该怎样看待这一系列运动和“左翼”中的争论? 第一、二、三章有所改动,传播时请以2023年11月后的版本为准。围绕“白纸抗议”进行的论战涉及了“社会主义革命还是民主革命”、“脑力雇佣劳动者是不是无产阶级”等问题,文章也对这些问题表明了态度
👍32❤3🔥1
《为什么机会主义者要把资产阶级的白纸说成红旗》(上篇) 作者:金睛 https://telegra.ph/%E4%B8%BA%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88%E6%9C%BA%E4%BC%9A%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E8%80%85%E8%A6%81%E6%8A%8A%E8%B5%84%E4%BA%A7%E9%98%B6%E7%BA%A7%E7%9A%84%E7%99%BD%E7%BA%B8%E8%AF%B4%E6%88%90%E7%BA%A2%E6%97%97-02-09 本文分为两篇,上篇分析“白纸抗议”的本质、其与工人斗争和市民解封运动的区别,揭露资产阶级自由派的嘴脸,下篇则批判各路机会主义者对白纸抗议和民主革命的吹捧,揭露机会主义者的资产阶级、小资产阶级立场,指明无产阶级革命派对此类事件的正确态度。 频道链接:https://t.me/gongrenjiefang 讨论群:@grjiefang
👍38❤2🔥1
File, posted without a caption
👍21😢7😡3🔥2
新疆、资本与民族压迫(三):监控、牢笼与资本过剩 几年间遍布新疆的庞大再教育营系统在技术监控程度和规模上属前所未见。但这样的大规模监控和关押本身不是特色政府新发明的,而是现代历史上,伴随着很多“民主”资产阶级国家的诞生和帝国主义国家的扩张,多次出现的现象。要了解新疆集中营的诞生,我们首先需要了解,这并不是“集权”的产物,而是数百年以来,在各种出现阶级压迫和阶级反抗的地方,统治者常用的武器。 https://telegra.ph/%E6%96%B0%E7%96%86%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%8E%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E5%8E%8B%E8%BF%AB%E4%B8%89%E7%9B%91%E6%8E%A7%E7%89%A2%E7%AC%BC%E4%B8%8E%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%BF%87%E5%89%A9-01-20
👍6❤1👎1
(2/2)https://telegra.ph/%E6%96%B0%E7%96%86%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%8E%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E5%8E%8B%E8%BF%AB%E4%BA%8C%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E5%92%8C%E9%98%B6%E7%BA%A7%E7%9A%84%E6%97%A5%E5%B8%B8-01-21-2
👍1
新疆、资本与民族压迫(二):民族和阶级的日常 无论是马克思,列宁还是毛,他们在自己的时代都是民族自治的捍卫者。其中的原因是他们早就意识到民族压迫在维系资产阶级统治上的作用。在这个系列的上一篇文章里,我们分析了新疆民族矛盾的原由,梳理了民族矛盾逐步深化和政府打压逐步升级的过程。在这一篇里,我们将讨论民族压迫和资本主义的关系,分析民族压迫被不同社会阶层逐步接受或默认的过程。 (1/2)https://telegra.ph/%E6%96%B0%E7%96%86%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%8E%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E5%8E%8B%E8%BF%AB%E4%BA%8C%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E5%92%8C%E9%98%B6%E7%BA%A7%E7%9A%84%E6%97%A5%E5%B8%B8-01-21
👍4
新疆、资本与民族压迫(一):新疆圈地与民族矛盾的崛起 作者:雨舟 https://telegra.ph/%E6%96%B0%E7%96%86%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%8E%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E5%8E%8B%E8%BF%AB%E4%B8%80%E6%96%B0%E7%96%86%E5%9C%88%E5%9C%B0%E4%B8%8E%E6%B0%91%E6%97%8F%E7%9F%9B%E7%9B%BE%E7%9A%84%E5%B4%9B%E8%B5%B7-01-22 自2017年,新疆有高达150万名维吾尔族、哈萨克族和回族人被关入再教育营。这意味着新疆的约1500万名穆斯林中,有接近10%被“消失”。在信息管控的环境之下,我们在国内很少能接触到任何关于这场在国土上上演的白色恐怖的消息。如果能看到,也通常只有西方帝国主义媒体提供的片面消息。新疆这场愈演愈烈的民族围剿成为了西方最喜欢…
👍4❤1
今天年初二,解放报祝所有同志们新年快乐,新年有新的斗志。 新年本应该快乐,但小编也知道今年有很多人无法快乐地过年。资本主义经济下行之中,资产阶级和资产阶级政府都在压低成本,很多人的生活面临新的困境。解放报开年之际,想邀请大家一起关注这些问题。 2022年12月,广州社保局将退休职工的医保返还金从484元缩减成160元。这项改变并没有任何通知或者新闻报道,广州社保局的这一行为让在广州退休的职工极为不满。从12月起,大量退休金只有1500到3000的退休职工多次去到广州社保局进行维权。面对众多退休职工的质问,广州市政府一边散播将会补回医保返还金的小道消息,另一边又要求警察给到社保局维权的退休职工打电话施加压力。如今到了2023年1月,退休职工的医保返还金依然只有160元。广州的退休职工愤怒地说,广州市政府克扣医保返还金的行为无异于向他们抢钱。 广州作为全国的一线城市,依然发生了这种公然侵犯退休职工医疗保障的恶劣行为,这不禁让人…
👍6
《防疫政策改变了,但对工人来说究竟改变了什么?》 作者:野草 https://telegra.ph/%E9%98%B2%E7%96%AB%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E6%94%B9%E5%8F%98%E4%BA%86%E4%BD%86%E5%AF%B9%E5%B7%A5%E4%BA%BA%E6%9D%A5%E8%AF%B4%E7%A9%B6%E7%AB%9F%E6%94%B9%E5%8F%98%E4%BA%86%E4%BB%80%E4%B9%88-12-19 防疫政策的改变,有利了谁,让哪些人高兴了呢?资本家是高兴的,小资产阶级也是比之前要高兴的,唯独是无产阶级,既增大了工作时的痛苦,又大大提高了受到感染的可能性。防疫政策前后的两种方式,其实表现了政府的两种性质:官僚专制的特殊性质,以及资产阶级的一般性质。 无产阶级的革命,不单止是需要打破国家官僚机构对社会的束缚,还要向资本主义发起直接的进攻,无产阶级的斗争目标不是替…
👍7
Channel name was changed to «解放报»
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @gongrenjiefang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“解放报” (@gongrenjiefang), 660 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gongrenjiefang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.