Channel
@gomdi_insight
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
97subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003440706008 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gomdi_insight |
| Description | 경제, 주식, 크립토 그 사이 연결고리 https://linktr.ee/Gomdi DM: @Gomdii |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gomdi_insight |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 97 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 97 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 459 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤔 | 6 | 35.3% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 29.4% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 29.4% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
환율은 이전에 비해 많이 하락했네요. 주 요인으로는 달러 수급요건 개선 (SK하이닉스 ADR조달 자금 환전, 수출 대기업 달러 매도 등)과 베선트 장관 발언 때문 "일본 엔화가 지나치게 약세를 보이면 다른 통화들도 뒤따라 약세를 보이게 된다", "그동안 한국 원화는 과도한 변동성을 보여 왔다" 🐻다만 현 상황이, 외부요인은 그대로인데 위의 일시적인 이유들 때문이라면 시간이 지나면 다시금 올라가지 않을까 생각됩니다. #환율
👍2
정부가 몰수한 가상자산 취득후 바로 경매로 ❓ - 정부가 1400조원대 국유자산 관리 체계를 전면 재설계 - 부동산 중심에서 주식, 가상자산까지 구축 - 범죄수익 환수나 기부 등을 통해 확보한 비트코인, 가상자산은 국가자산으로 명문화 - 가상자산은 취득 후 경매를 통해 처분하는 것을 원칙으로 🐻 가상자산을 취득 후 경매로 붙인다는 건, 가격 변동성이 오히려 더 커지는 거 아닌가요? source #가상자산
🤔1
CZ "통계적으로 셀커보다 거래소가 안전" 원문 맥시들이 발작할 폭탄 발언... ㄷㄷ 저도 어느정도 동의는 합니다. 월렛 개념도 잘 없는 초보자들 데려다가 거래소에서 꺼내라고 강요하는 경우가 많은데 (*거의 윽박지르듯 가르치는 느낌) 그러다가 어이없는 실수로 돈 날린 사람을 많이 봤음 개인지갑, 하드월렛, 셀프 커스터디는 스스로 필요에 의해서 해야합니다. 누가 강요할 부분이 아니라고 생각함 제대로 하면 셀프커스터디가 안전한데 제대로 안되는 경우가 생김... 물리적인 강탈도 있고, 잃어버리거나 갑자기 사망하는 케이스도 있습니다.
하루 5% 등락한 날 33일…블룸버그, 韓에 ‘투자 불가’ 국가 분류 블룸버그가 한국을 ‘투자 불가(uninvestable)’ 시장으로 분류했다. 한국 증시가 올해 전 세계에서 변동성이 가장 컸다는 이유에서다. 투자불가란? 최근 급격한 증시 변동성과 정책 운영에 대한 우려 때문에 투자 환경이 악화되고 있다는 경고성 표현 실제로 이런 인식이 확산되면 외국인 자금 유출, 지수 편입 비중 축소, 할인(코리아 디스카운트) 확대 등으로 이어질 수 있어 시장에는 상당히 부정적인 신호.
🤔1
세일러는 이제 비트맥시가 아니라 채권 이자 세일즈맨이 되었습니다
$MSTR - STRATEGY SELLS 1,638 BITCOIN, BOOSTS CASH RESERVE Strategy raised $290.6M by selling 3.01M shares through its ATM program. The company allocated $250M to its USD Reserve, $28.9M to STRC share repurchases and $11.7M to cash. Strategy also sold 1,638 Bitcoin at an average price of $63,957, raising $104.7M to fund preferred dividends and additional STRC buybacks. As of Aug. 2, the company held 842,138 Bitco…
현 1300만 코인 투자자들이 이렇게 “알아서” 하면, 국가에서 처리하는 시간만 1년은 넘어갈 듯. ⌛
🤔1
위와 같은 골때리지만 흔한 상황도 다 이렇게 "알아서" 해야함.
3월에 테더 천개로 어떤 알트코인을 사서 테더로 팔았는데, 5월에 매도차익은 100USDT야 근데 내가 이걸 12월 31일까지 들고 있었는데, 테더 가격이 10원 내렸어. 참고로 내가 원금으로 사용한 테더도 그대로 있어. 이 테더의 취득원가는 10원 내려간 가격보다 3원 높아.
과세 찾아보니 거래내역 전부 개인이 다 소명? 해야 되는건데 그러면 개인이 제출한 자료를 맞는지 안맞는지 어떻게 판단할 것이며, 만약 이 판단이 가능한 시스템이 있다면 굳이 개인이 소명할 필요도 없는 것 아닌가 싶네요. 정리하면 “내년부터 걷을건데 아직 프로세스는 준비가 안되었어 그러니 각자 전부 소명해 못하면 처벌이야” 이 말인가..?
🤯1
1. 토큰 스왑을 매도처리하고 스테이블코인끼리 스왑해도 22% 떼가고 이런건 다른 국가들도 하고있으니까 납득은 됩니다. 모든 과정에서 발생하는 수익에 대해 22% 세금을 떼겠다는 의지로 해석하면 되니까 뭐.. 2. 해외거래소와의 손익통산은 자진신고시 근거자료 제출하면 받아줄 것 같습니다. 자동 수집까지 바라기도 어려울듯.. 제일 우려스러운건 크립토에 상대적으로 익숙한 텔레그램 커뮤니티에서조차 이건 어떻게 처리되는거냐는 질문이 마구 나오는데 아직 명확하게 제시된 기준이 하나도 없다는 것. 자진신고 기반으로 운영해보고, 필요시 보완하겠다는데 결국 보완에 이르기까지는 수많은 코인러들의 행정처리 과정에서의 불편과 언제 올지 모르는 국세청으로부터의 호출에 대한 불안이 발생할 수 밖에 없음. 소수 납세자를 대상으로 납세 예정 금액이라도 산정해서 …
6번 금투세와는 무관하면서 8번 이월공제는 주식도 없다 = 명분이야 만들면 된다
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gomdi_insight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 743,385 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“곰디의 알고(Gomdi's Algo)” (@gomdi_insight), 97 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gomdi_insight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.