🚨 Feds just froze $938M in scam crypto after Xinbi Guarantee bust — and they're coming for more So the US Scam Center Strike Force just yanked another $52M in scam-linked crypto in a single day, bringing the total to roughly $938M. The target? Xinbi Guarantee — a Telegram-based marketplace that Treasury says processed over $24B, and yeah, the North Korean hackers used it. ▪️ Xinbi ran an escrow on Telegram — held t…

Channel
GODL
@godlcoin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001749011540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @godlcoin |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/godlcoin |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 19 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 19 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 18 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.58%
- avg views ÷ 19 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.3
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 September 2026 – 13 September 2026) |
| Views total | 25 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 10
- Links
- 116
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
😴 Dead tape, snoozing majors — and an LSK pump nobody sane should chase BTC parked at $77,270 (+0.02%), ETH at $2,522 (+0.39%) over the last day — majors frozen solid, a tape so dead you can hear the funding drip. And off in the corner, one alt decided to run without them. LSK ripping on a market like this isn't strength, it's a trap wearing a nice green candle. Nothing goes vertical while BTC snores unless somebody…
🐋 This whale nailed the ETH top, sat in stables for 8 months, and just dumped $85M into Bitcoin — he's already red The wallet that called the ETH top — 50,600 coins out the door at an average of $2,921 back in late 2025 — parked in stablecoins for eight months doing absolutely nothing. Then it started eating Bitcoin. Four days of buying later, $85.42 million in USDC is now 1,075.6 BTC at an average of $79,412 a coin…
🩸 CPI took $732M in liquidations — and BTC is already back at $77K BTC sits at $77,182 (+0.14%), ETH at $2,512 (+2.16%) — the CPI pump is fully round-tripped and that $79,837 candle is a museum piece now. Yesterday was a two-sided massacre: first the shorts got smoked, then the longs who chased the green like it was free money. ▪️ ZEC +4.4% on $436M volume is the only mover with real size — a privacy bid, everythin…
🔥 BTC wicks to $80K on CPI, $732M fed to the grinder Bitcoin spiked to $79,837 Friday the second BLS printed August CPI in line with forecasts — and the whole crypto market still paid $732 million in liquidations for the privilege. Shorts ate $424M of that. By 12:07 p.m. EST BTC was back at $77,800, up 1% on the day, market cap near $1.57 trillion. The price barely moved and half the book got deleted. That's not a m…
🔥 $250M shorts got fucking annihilated in an hour – BTC & ETH rip on CPI, bears rekt CPI drops, and BTC instantly pulls the 'fakeout' card – rips to $79k like a kid who just got his candy. ETH? Up 8% to $2,660. Result: over $250M in shorts turned to dust in one hour. Classic move – shake the weak, then blast off. If you were short, you got exactly what you deserved. ▪️ Act 1: CPI matches forecasts – and BTC dumps t…
📉 Morning digest: BTC slips, 牛来 pumps, Liquid's 'white-hat' gives back 3,400 BTC – but your money's still frozen BTC -1.63% at $77,112, ETH -0.78% at $2,459 – red board, no panic yet. The big flex: Liquid's 'white-hat' scooped ~4,000 BTC and returned 3,400 before the network even resumed block production. Generous, right? ▪️ Gainers: 牛来 +46% ($77M volume), RAY +20.1%, MARSCOIN +8.7%, ETHFI +8.7%, UNI +1.3% – Chines…
ZEC just mooned 150% — and the bears are already sharpening their fucking knives 🐻 Zcash punched through $1,200 for the first time since 2016 — yeah, because Grayscale waved their shiny new ETF in front of the herd and of course the FOMO kicked in. But here’s the kicker: the exact same shit that wrecked ZEC by 64% back in May just popped up again. The party’s about to get a visit from the cops, and you know who’s go…
💀 Liquid Network back after 4,000 BTC exploit — hacker keeps 600 BTC as 'bounty' Liquid sidechain just woke up after some 'white-hat' hacker yanked 4,000 BTC (~$320M) from its federation wallet. He gave back 3,400 BTC but still pockets 600 BTC and now wants a 10% bounty on top. Blockstream CEO Adam Back says 'don't panic sell' and promises L-BTC peg is covered 1:1 — but transactions are still frozen, you know the dr…
💸 Nasdaq just dropped $100M on Kraken — and now hamsters are promised tokenized stocks with 'voting rights' Nasdaq pumped $100 million into Payward (Kraken's parent) through its VC arm, valuing the shop at $21 billion. That's 1.5x what Deutsche Börse paid in April ($13.3B). The game: Kraken will hand you tokenized Nasdaq stocks with voting rights — not just 'catch the price,' actual votes at shareholder meetings. To…
Morning Meat: BTC Drips, LAPTOP Rugs, and Oil Says Fuck Your Bags BTC slid to $78,351 (-0.95%), ETH barely holding at $2,477 — the boring chop is just the background noise. The real shit you need to watch: IOST pumping 16.5% on $59M volume, and a 22-year-old Singaporean just copped to stealing $245M in crypto via home invasions and online scams. Also, some meme coin rug that started as a $1.6B joke ended as a 98% bu…
🐋 Jump's $150B Hyperliquid Run: 8% of Perps, $7M in Fees, Zero Fucks Jump Trading quietly racked up nearly $150 billion in volume on Hyperliquid since December — that's 8% of every perpetual future traded on the exchange. But don't kid yourself: they're not here to gamble on HYPE pumps with you. This is an institutional arb operation, and they're using Hyperliquid as one leg of a multi-venue hedge machine. You're ju…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @godlcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GODL” (@godlcoin), 19 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/godlcoin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.