Channel
@glazychevskiechteniya
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
328subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001774165819 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glazychevskiechteniya |
| Created | 4 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glazychevskiechteniya |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 328 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 329 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 328 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 329 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 329 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
110 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 83 | 75.5% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 10.0% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 9.09% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 2.73% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.909% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.909% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.909% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥰Глазычевские чтения - 2026 3-4 июля в Арзамасе Нижегородской области прошли XIV Глазычевские чтения - ключевое событие для урбанистов, архитекторов, девелоперов и представителей власти. Конференция, посвященная памяти выдающегося российского урбаниста Вячеслава Глазычева, в этом году собрала более 60 экспертов и 200 участников. Партнерами выступили: ДОМ.PФ, Администрация городского округа г. Арзамас, АНО «Управляю…
🔥5❤4👏4
🤩 Малые города начинают всерьёз рассматриваться как полноценные конкуренты мегаполисов: что обсуждали на «Глазычевских чтениях» в Арзамасе? Каждый год урбанисты, планировщики и исследователи городов съезжаются на «Глазычевские чтения» — и каждый раз в новый город. Конференцию проводит Кафедра территориального развития им. В.Л. Глазычева РАНХиГС при поддержке ДОМ.PФ. В этом году площадкой стал Арзамас: город тридцат…
🔥2❤1
🙂🙂🙂 XIV «Глазычевские чтения»: круглый стол «Выбор остаться: как сохранить и приумножить человеческий потенциал вне мегаполисов» 🙂 Модератор — Владимир Климанов, руководитель Центра региональной политики Академии, организатор — кафедра Глазычева Президентской академии. Участники — представители разных профессиональных школ и городов: Москвы, Петербурга, Казани, Арзамаса. Сессия была посвящена трем ключевым вопроса…
❤8
В Арзамасе на Глазычевских чтениях поделился отдельными результатами многолетней исследовательской работы про факторы привлекательности индустриальных городов. Презентацию можно посмотреть здесь. Ключевые тезисы на полях: 🚀 За последние 5 лет центры экономического роста в индустриальных городах сместились из сырьевых и обрабатывающих центров в центры машиностроения и ВПК. Какие времена, такие и точки роста. 👍 Около…
❤4
💫Города, у которых получилось. 100 кейсов, которые мы бы показали Глазычеву Именно таким вопросом задались первокурсники Кафедры территориального развития имени В.Л. Глазычева. Получился атлас проектов, который был презентован вчера на Глазычевских чтениях. «кто твой город» не может пройти мимо: постепенно мы опубликуем ВСЕ кейсы. Ну а пока перекличка. Хочется узнать, попал ли ваш или ваш любимый проект в атлас? …
❤10
🪟В рамках «Глазычевских чтений» участники прошли по маршруту от Литературного перекрёстка и улицы Карла Маркса до Воскресенского собора и Спасо-Преображенского монастыря, где посетили водонапорную башню со смотровой площадкой и прониклись той самой арзамасской атмосферой.
❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤6
💚 На связи Глава города Арзамас Александр Щелоков.
❤3
🚀 Заведующий кафедрой территориального развития им. В.Л. Глазычева Президентской академии Дмитрий Соснин — о Глазычевских Чтениях, прекрасном городе Арзамас и ДОМ.PФ как многолетнем партнёре.
❤3
В Арзамасе прошел первый день XIV всероссийской научно-практической конференции «Глазычевские Чтения» Конференцию проводит Кафедра территориального развития им. В.Л. Глазычева РАНХиГС при поддержке ДОМ.PФ и Администрации города Арзамас. В этом году ключевая тема мероприятия — «Полицентричные агломерации как альтернатива мегаполисам». Выбор Арзамаса как площадки символичен: город входит в туристический кластер «Арза…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @glazychevskiechteniya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Глазычевские чтения 2026” (@glazychevskiechteniya), 328 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glazychevskiechteniya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.