▶️ Власти Украины используют своих самых крепких карателей не в окопах, а для защиты от народа и проведения репрессий против несогласных, заявил Небензя. Видео: Раптли/ТАСС/UN Web TV ✔️ Подпишись на ТАСС в "Максе"
👍1
Signed Николай Дементьев

Channel
@glavsu
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,632subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001451910571 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @glavsu |
| Description | # 4900267204 Официальный канал форума Глобальная Авантюра. Мы в Махе https://max.ru/glavsu #QQSVA Чат канала Глобальная Авантюра: https://t.me/+jJmJRb3jmE41ZDZi |
| Created | 17 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/glavsu |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 8 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @banksta/1047393 Nov 2026, 18:38 UTC | @glavsu/231056 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 20:36 UTC | 1.00 | 2.0 hours |
| @banksta/1047994 Nov 2026, 19:27 UTC | @glavsu/231219 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 22:16 UTC | 1.00 | 2.8 hours |
| @banksta/1048034 Nov 2026, 20:46 UTC | @glavsu/231220 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 22:16 UTC | 1.00 | 1.5 hours |
| @banksta/1048044 Nov 2026, 20:59 UTC | @glavsu/231221 · this entry4 Nov 2026, 22:17 UTC | 1.00 | 79 minutes |
| @banksta/1049195 Nov 2026, 21:35 UTC | @glavsu/231402 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 00:23 UTC | 1.00 | 2.8 hours |
| @bbbreaking/2416646 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC | @glavsu/231502 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC | 1.00 | 89 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @banksta | 12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 1.9 hours | @banksta (12–0) |
| @bbbreaking | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 74 minutes | @bbbreaking (11–0) |
| @bankoville | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | 1.9 hours | @bankoville (5–0) |
| @infantmilitario | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 68 minutes | @infantmilitario (10–0) |
| @karaulny | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.1 hours | @karaulny (7–0) |
| @Channel_No6 | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3.8 hours | @Channel_No6 (6–0) |
| @sheyhtamir1974 | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 58 minutes | @sheyhtamir1974 (5–0) |
| @glavmedia | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 17 minutes | @glavmedia (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 31 of the 31 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 208 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:36 | 6,632 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:49 | 6,630 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 6,626 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:58 | 6,628 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 6,632 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:47 | 6,633 | +6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 03:11 | 6,627 | +4 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 20:38 | 6,623 | +7 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 6,616 | -4 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 6,620 | -14 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 6,634 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 6,635 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 6,636 | +8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 6,628 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 6,630 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 6,622 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 6,624 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 6,620 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 6,622 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 6,627 | first reading |
243 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 98 of 130 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 243 (6 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 40,666 |
| Reactions total | 605 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 16:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,817 reactions across 204 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 483 | 26.6% | |
| 😁 | 446 | 24.5% | |
| 🔥 | 222 | 12.2% | |
| ❤ | 167 | 9.19% | |
| 🤡 | 92 | 5.06% | |
| ✍ | 69 | 3.80% | |
| 👏 | 54 | 2.97% | |
| 🤬 | 40 | 2.20% | |
| 🤔 | 38 | 2.09% | |
| 🫡 | 37 | 2.04% | |
| 💯 | 26 | 1.43% | |
| 👎 | 22 | 1.21% | |
| 😢 | 21 | 1.16% | |
| 💊 | 20 | 1.10% | |
| 🤷♂ | 18 | 0.991% | |
| 👀 | 13 | 0.715% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 0.495% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 0.44% | |
| 🗿 | 7 | 0.385% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 0.33% | |
| 6 further kinds | 19 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 207 of the 243 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,817 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 243 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 130 posts held from the last 30 days (6.15%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
▶️ Власти Украины используют своих самых крепких карателей не в окопах, а для защиты от народа и проведения репрессий против несогласных, заявил Небензя. Видео: Раптли/ТАСС/UN Web TV ✔️ Подпишись на ТАСС в "Максе"
👍1
Signed Николай Дементьев
❗️Россия не стремится к вооруженному столкновению с Европой, однако если она сама развяжет войну, события могут развиваться стремительно, сообщил Небензя.
👍11
Signed Николай Дементьев
Россия не согласится на замораживание конфликта, которое позволит сохранить существующую угрозу безопасности, заявил Небензя.
👍11
Signed Николай Дементьев
❗ Брат советника Зеленского Подоляка погиб, сражаясь за Россию: два ордена Мужества и погоны полковника 59-летний Владимир Подоляк, старший брат советника бывшего главы офиса президента Украины Михаила Подоляка, погиб 19 мая 2024 года в Запорожской области. Согласно данным Росстата, он был полковником российской армии. На его парадном портрете видны два ордена Мужества и знак «За службу в военной разведке». Владими…
🫡22❤11🔥3
Signed Николай Дементьев
Конфликт Зеленского и Кличко из-за возможности управлять ресурсами становится жестче. Они могут начать раскрывать финансовые махинации друг друга. Такое мнение выразил ТАСС сенатор РФ от ДНР Александр Волошин. Ранее Зеленский назвал "худшей" ситуацию с длительным отсутствием электроснабжения и воды в Киеве, обвинив городские власти в том, что те не смогли подготовиться к отопительному сезону. Кличко же обвинил Зелен…
👍4
Signed axmadi
«Академик Федоров» выходит из большого порта Санкт-Петербурга и берет курс Кейптаун 🇿🇦 #ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ #ЛЕДОКОЛ Proper ship ⚓️
🔥5
Signed axmadi
В финском городе Нокиа владельцы дома площадью 180 кв. м заменили централизованное отопление биткоин-майнером. Новое оборудование не только эффективно обогревает жильё с помощью горячей воды, но и одновременно добывает криптовалюту. В итоге полученный доход от продажи крипты полностью покрывает все расходы на электроэнергию. @banksta
Signed Николай Дементьев
В 2004 году спонсором "Что? Где? Когда?" был сотовый оператор Сонет. Он вручал лучшему игроку золотой мобильный телефон с оплаченной связью на 100 лет. Через два года оператор Сонет закрылся
😁26
Украина готовит масштабную атаку мошеннических колл-центов против россиян, сообщает Руслан Осташко. По его данным, украинские СМИ пишут о массовом наборе операторов колл-центров в Киеве, Харькове и Днепропетровске с конца октября, людей набирают сотнями. Это произошло после того, как стало известно о планах мобильных операторов в России блокировать с ноября звонки банков гражданам РФ. Поводом для блокировки стал спор…
👎3👍1
Signed Николай Дементьев
Над итальянским островом Капри образовались сразу два водяных смерча. Редкое природное явление заметили у знаменитых скал Фаральони. Водяные смерчи чаще всего возникают над Средиземным морем в конце лета и осенью, когда холодный воздух встречается с относительно тёплой водой. Сами по себе такие смерчи не удивляют местных, но вот двойной — редкость.
🔥5
Signed Николай Дементьев
❗️Россия знает о планах стран Запада по блокаде Калининградской области Попытки их реализовать станут «прямым путем к катастрофе», заявил замглавы МИД РФ Сергей Рябков. Рябков также рассказал, что российская сторона наблюдает рост провокационной активности в Балтике. По его словам, судоходству России создаются препятствия «в нарушение норм международного права».
💯10
Signed Николай Дементьев
▶️ Запад пытается затянуть российско-украинский конфликт, чтобы подготовиться к конфликту с РФ и выиграть дополнительное время, заявил Рябков. Видео: Раптли/ТАСС ✔️ Подпишись на ТАСС в "Максе"
💯12
Signed Николай Дементьев
Showing the 12 most recent of 243 posts we hold for @glavsu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 72 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@glavsu named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Глобальная Авантюра” (@glavsu), 6,632 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/glavsu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.