Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GOLDHUNTER PAUL ๐Ÿฆ WORLDWIDE COMMUNITY ๐Ÿ‘‘

Channel

GOLDHUNTER PAUL ๐Ÿฆ WORLDWIDE COMMUNITY ๐Ÿ‘‘

@ghptrading

On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Channels linked by matching posts ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

201,961subscribers

-1,748 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 100,000โ€“316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002033681012
TypeChannel
Username@ghptrading
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ghptrading

Topic

Gambling & betting โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 6 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโ€™s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts โ€” open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@paultradingeducation/1145817 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC@ghptrading/45957 ยท this entry17 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC1.004.6 hours
@ghptrading/46857 ยท this entry27 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC@paultradingeducation/1235927 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC1.00under a minute
@ghptrading/46992 ยท this entry28 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC@paultradingeducation/1249428 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC1.00under a minute
@ghptrading/46998 ยท this entry28 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC@paultradingeducation/1250028 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC1.002 minutes
@ghptrading/46999 ยท this entry28 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC@paultradingeducation/1250128 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@ghptrading/47003 ยท this entry28 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC@paultradingeducation/1250528 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@paultradingeducation17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (16โ€“1)
@Goldhunter_Academy10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9772 secondsthis entry (9โ€“1)
@rickgld9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (9โ€“0)
@pauleducationtoday7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (7โ€“0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ€” in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

โ€œPublished firstโ€ means first in this corpus. We hold 47 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detectorโ€™s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 6 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @ghptrading โ€” which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. โ€œFirstโ€ could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channelโ€™s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a โ€œForwarded fromโ€ credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ€” a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ€” and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

196,872208,405202,638.5201,9617 August 202611 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,748. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 195,142โ€“210,135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 11:37201,961-1,472
9 Nov 2026, 15:39203,433-1,167
8 Nov 2026, 09:59204,600+5,101
7 Nov 2026, 07:28199,499-656
6 Nov 2026, 10:17200,155-867
5 Nov 2026, 09:49201,022-808
4 Nov 2026, 06:57201,830-1,254
3 Nov 2026, 03:16203,084-1,162
2 Nov 2026, 06:36204,246-1,809
1 Nov 2026, 03:25206,055-1,966
31 Oct 2026, 06:21208,021+3,004
30 Oct 2026, 03:28205,017+2,618
29 Oct 2026, 00:36202,399+4,387
27 Oct 2026, 20:46198,012-1,178
26 Oct 2026, 17:44199,190-784
25 Oct 2026, 19:47199,974-780
24 Oct 2026, 22:18200,754+3,882
23 Oct 2026, 23:28196,872-854
22 Oct 2026, 22:06197,726-914
21 Oct 2026, 22:41198,640first reading

Engagement

642 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 642 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 32s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

265,302 reactions across 642 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ‘47,35117.8%
โค46,27417.4%
๐Ÿ”ฅ44,13216.6%
๐Ÿ‘42,72016.1%
๐Ÿ˜42,68416.1%
๐ŸŽ‰41,78615.8%
โšก1620.061%
๐Ÿ†1090.041%
๐Ÿ’ฏ840.032%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 642 of the 642 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 265,302 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 642 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 642 we hold a reading for ยท 4%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @ghptrading. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 642 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTCโ‰ˆ14,500 views424 reactionsread 30 August 2026

โ„น๏ธ Iโ€™ve created a new personal Instagram account where Iโ€™ll be sharing more of my daily life and private moments. If youโ€™d like to follow along, youโ€™re welcome to join me here! ๐Ÿ“ง

๐ŸŽ‰146๐Ÿ”ฅ98โค52๐Ÿ‘47๐Ÿ˜41๐Ÿ‘40

30 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTCโ‰ˆ15,700 views421 reactionsread 30 August 2026

๐Ÿ–ฅMake sure you turn on the notifications and wait for a chance to get a FREE Spot. ๐Ÿ“ฃ

๐Ÿ˜135โค99๐Ÿ‘56๐ŸŽ‰47๐Ÿ”ฅ44๐Ÿ‘40

30 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTCโ‰ˆ15,600 views419 reactionsread 30 August 2026

We are live โ–ถ๏ธโš ๏ธ ๐Ÿ’ฌOur GoldHunter Team is ready to help you out. Already 167 people are chatting with us. 140 spots left ๐Ÿ“Œโ˜„๏ธโ˜„๏ธโ˜„๏ธ โ„น๏ธ @goldhunternowbot

๐Ÿ˜144๐Ÿ‘86๐ŸŽ‰52๐Ÿ‘47โค46๐Ÿ”ฅ43๐Ÿ’ฏ1

30 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTCโ‰ˆ15,500 views414 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

๐ŸŽ‰147๐Ÿ‘84๐Ÿ˜50๐Ÿ‘47๐Ÿ”ฅ44โค42

29 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTCโ‰ˆ13,700 views441 reactionsread 30 August 2026

VIP MEMBERS SMASHING โœ๐Ÿผ

๐Ÿ”ฅ137๐Ÿ˜96โค58๐Ÿ‘57๐Ÿ‘48๐ŸŽ‰45

29 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTCโ‰ˆ13,100 views431 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Omg Paul i did it๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ˜ฎ

๐ŸŽ‰139๐Ÿ”ฅ99โค55๐Ÿ‘51๐Ÿ‘47๐Ÿ˜40

29 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTCโ‰ˆ13,500 views554 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026

GUYS ARE WE READY FOR BITCOIN ??? SEND ME READY @goldhunternow

โค206๐Ÿ˜104๐Ÿ‘77๐Ÿ”ฅ63๐Ÿ‘51๐ŸŽ‰44โšก9

29 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTCโ‰ˆ14,600 views458 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘164๐Ÿ”ฅ89โค68๐Ÿ˜51๐ŸŽ‰42๐Ÿ‘42โšก1๐Ÿ†1

29 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTCโ‰ˆ12,700 views435 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Sorry itโ€™s late xx 930 in a day xx thank you โค๏ธโค๏ธ

๐Ÿ˜132โค113๐Ÿ”ฅ51๐Ÿ‘48๐ŸŽ‰46๐Ÿ‘45

29 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTCโ‰ˆ12,400 views422 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Yeah this is our Paul...... When we start winning it almost impossible to lose always remember that!!!!!!!!

โค139๐ŸŽ‰96๐Ÿ‘51๐Ÿ”ฅ47๐Ÿ‘45๐Ÿ˜44

29 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTCโ‰ˆ17,700 views446 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Coming soon our education hub app โš ๏ธ Write now โœ๐Ÿผ if you want to be the first one โ˜๏ธ @goldhunternowbot

๐Ÿ”ฅ145๐Ÿ‘95๐Ÿ‘56โค53๐ŸŽ‰50๐Ÿ˜45โšก2

28 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTCโ‰ˆ13,900 views436 reactionsread 30 August 2026

We are live โ–ถ๏ธโš ๏ธ ๐Ÿ’ฌOur GoldHunter Team is ready to help you out. Already 56 people are chatting with us. 24 spots left ๐Ÿ“Œโ˜„๏ธโ˜„๏ธโ˜„๏ธ โ„น๏ธ @goldhunternowbot

๐Ÿ”ฅ132โค107๐Ÿ‘55๐ŸŽ‰53๐Ÿ˜46๐Ÿ‘43

Showing the 12 most recent of 642 posts we hold for @ghptrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTCAnonymous Poll619 voters

WHO IS THE REAL KING

  1. Paul goldhunter90%
  2. Other channels12%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTCAnonymous Poll517 voters

Make good profit this winning streak week

  1. 50% profit29%
  2. 25% profit16%
  3. 10% profit19%
  4. 5% profit44%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTCAnonymous Poll246 voters

Are you holding cpi like me

  1. Yes I have discipline45%
  2. No I canโ€™t , to much emotions57%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTCAnonymous Poll199 voters

Are we back in town ?

  1. Yes keep going guys44%
  2. Yes but missed all trades today41%
  3. No Iโ€™m broke ! I stop trading18%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 642 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegramโ€™s own answer, not this registerโ€™s. When this register asks Telegramโ€™s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ€” never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโ€™s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

๐‡๐š๐Ÿ๐ฎ ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฅ๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐œ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญโ„ข๐Ÿ•‹
@Hafu_posts ยท 17,649
#1
Crypto News
@Crypto_Newss_360 ยท 6,327 (as read 13 August 2026)
#2
๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ‘จCouples Pic๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ‘จ
@couplespic2 ยท 7,919
#3
แ‹ณแˆฉแˆ tube
@darule_Qurane ยท 2,555
#4
Shamo Casino
@Shamobet_et ยท 90,910
#5
โœจ๐‘’๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘–๐‘œ ๐‘“๐‘ข๐‘›๐‘›๐‘ฆโ„ข๐Ÿ’ญ๐Ÿคฃ
@ethiofunnyjokess ยท 79,883
#6
Crypto pulse
@cryptonews2555 ยท 15,078
#7
๐Ÿ’ปแดแด€แด แด›แด‡แด„สœ แด›แด‡แด„สœษดแดสŸแดษขส ษชษดsแด›ษชแด›แดœแด›แด‡๐Ÿ“ฒ
@mamtech1 ยท 10,572
#8
แŠจแแ‰…แˆญ แˆ›แˆ…แ‹ฐแˆญ
@kefikirmahider ยท 134,500
#9
แŠขแ‰ตแ‹ฎ แˆ›แŠ•แ‰ธแˆตแ‰ฐแˆญ แˆฒแ‰ฒโ„ข
@MAN_CITY_ETHIO_FAN ยท 246,038
#10
Daily Combo
@Daily_Combo_For ยท 10,838 (as read 13 August 2026)
#11
crypto dollar
@heyab360 ยท 4,799
#12
๐™บ๐šŽ๐š ๐šœ๐šŽ๐š› |แดฉแด๊œฑแด›๊œฑ
@kewser_post ยท 5,377
#13
Crypto news
@cryptonewsupdates1234 ยท 6,107
#14
Ethio Digital Marketing
@ethiodigitalmarket11 ยท 5,824
#15
แŒฅแ‰ แ‰ฅ
@tebabsenasehuf ยท 3,337
#16
Crypto World
@cryptoworldet2024 ยท 10,676
#17
ZEWD SPORTS
@zewdsport_1 ยท 42,693
#18
๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Quality of Mainstream Animes
@Quality_of_Mainstream ยท 17,664
#19
Crypto currency news
@Crypto32108 ยท 9,695
#20
crypto daily
@cryptoN7725 ยท 10,305
#21
Crypto investment
@cryptoinv7725 ยท 5,296
#22
PICTURE
@ETIopicturee ยท 16,786
#23
Solinpay Market
@verified_jobsethiopia ยท 8,387
#24
crypto ๐Ÿ’ฐ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ’ต๐Ÿ’ธ
@Best_chanal_best ยท 2,378
#25
UAT Tutorial Official
@UATtutorialofficial ยท 13,993
#26

Read from Telegramโ€™s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ€” how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

โœจ๐‘’๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘–๐‘œ ๐‘“๐‘ข๐‘›๐‘›๐‘ฆโ„ข๐Ÿ’ญ๐Ÿคฃ
@ethiofunnyjokess ยท 79,883
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 61 here โ€” alongside 60 others โ€” read 18 August 2026
แŠจแแ‰…แˆญ แˆ›แˆ…แ‹ฐแˆญ
@kefikirmahider ยท 134,500
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 45 here โ€” alongside 44 others โ€” read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œGOLDHUNTER PAUL ๐Ÿฆ WORLDWIDE COMMUNITY ๐Ÿ‘‘โ€ (@ghptrading), 201,961 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghptrading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.