โน๏ธ Iโve created a new personal Instagram account where Iโll be sharing more of my daily life and private moments. If youโd like to follow along, youโre welcome to join me here! ๐ง
๐146๐ฅ98โค52๐47๐41๐40

Channel
@ghptrading
On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Channels linked by matching posts ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
201,961subscribers
-1,748 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 100,000โ316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002033681012 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ghptrading |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ghptrading |
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 6 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโs forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @paultradingeducation/1145817 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC | @ghptrading/45957 ยท this entry17 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC | 1.00 | 4.6 hours |
| @ghptrading/46857 ยท this entry27 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC | @paultradingeducation/1235927 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ghptrading/46992 ยท this entry28 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC | @paultradingeducation/1249428 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ghptrading/46998 ยท this entry28 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC | @paultradingeducation/1250028 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @ghptrading/46999 ยท this entry28 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC | @paultradingeducation/1250128 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ghptrading/47003 ยท this entry28 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC | @paultradingeducation/1250528 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @paultradingeducation | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (16โ1) |
| @Goldhunter_Academy | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | 72 seconds | this entry (9โ1) |
| @rickgld | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (9โ0) |
| @pauleducationtoday | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (7โ0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
โPublished firstโ means first in this corpus. We hold 47 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detectorโs own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 6 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @ghptrading โ which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 6 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. โFirstโ could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channelโs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a โForwarded fromโ credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 11:37 | 201,961 | -1,472 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 15:39 | 203,433 | -1,167 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 09:59 | 204,600 | +5,101 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:28 | 199,499 | -656 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:17 | 200,155 | -867 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:49 | 201,022 | -808 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:57 | 201,830 | -1,254 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:16 | 203,084 | -1,162 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:36 | 204,246 | -1,809 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:25 | 206,055 | -1,966 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:21 | 208,021 | +3,004 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 205,017 | +2,618 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 202,399 | +4,387 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 198,012 | -1,178 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:44 | 199,190 | -784 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 199,974 | -780 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:18 | 200,754 | +3,882 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:28 | 196,872 | -854 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 197,726 | -914 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:41 | 198,640 | first reading |
642 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 642 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
265,302 reactions across 642 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 47,351 | 17.8% | |
| โค | 46,274 | 17.4% | |
| ๐ฅ | 44,132 | 16.6% | |
| ๐ | 42,720 | 16.1% | |
| ๐ | 42,684 | 16.1% | |
| ๐ | 41,786 | 15.8% | |
| โก | 162 | 0.061% | |
| ๐ | 109 | 0.041% | |
| ๐ฏ | 84 | 0.032% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 642 of the 642 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 265,302 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 642 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @ghptrading. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 642 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
โน๏ธ Iโve created a new personal Instagram account where Iโll be sharing more of my daily life and private moments. If youโd like to follow along, youโre welcome to join me here! ๐ง
๐146๐ฅ98โค52๐47๐41๐40
๐ฅMake sure you turn on the notifications and wait for a chance to get a FREE Spot. ๐ฃ
๐135โค99๐56๐47๐ฅ44๐40
We are live โถ๏ธโ ๏ธ ๐ฌOur GoldHunter Team is ready to help you out. Already 167 people are chatting with us. 140 spots left ๐โ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธ โน๏ธ @goldhunternowbot
๐144๐86๐52๐47โค46๐ฅ43๐ฏ1
Video, posted without a caption
๐147๐84๐50๐47๐ฅ44โค42
VIP MEMBERS SMASHING โ๐ผ
๐ฅ137๐96โค58๐57๐48๐45
Omg Paul i did it๐ช๐ฎ
๐139๐ฅ99โค55๐51๐47๐40
GUYS ARE WE READY FOR BITCOIN ??? SEND ME READY @goldhunternow
โค206๐104๐77๐ฅ63๐51๐44โก9
Video message, posted without a caption
๐164๐ฅ89โค68๐51๐42๐42โก1๐1
Sorry itโs late xx 930 in a day xx thank you โค๏ธโค๏ธ
๐132โค113๐ฅ51๐48๐46๐45
Yeah this is our Paul...... When we start winning it almost impossible to lose always remember that!!!!!!!!
โค139๐96๐51๐ฅ47๐45๐44
Coming soon our education hub app โ ๏ธ Write now โ๐ผ if you want to be the first one โ๏ธ @goldhunternowbot
๐ฅ145๐95๐56โค53๐50๐45โก2
We are live โถ๏ธโ ๏ธ ๐ฌOur GoldHunter Team is ready to help you out. Already 56 people are chatting with us. 24 spots left ๐โ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธ โน๏ธ @goldhunternowbot
๐ฅ132โค107๐55๐53๐46๐43
Showing the 12 most recent of 642 posts we hold for @ghptrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
WHO IS THE REAL KING
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Make good profit this winning streak week
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Are you holding cpi like me
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Are we back in town ?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 642 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โGOLDHUNTER PAUL ๐ฆ WORLDWIDE COMMUNITY ๐โ (@ghptrading), 201,961 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghptrading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.