Channel
@mamtech1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,012subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000â31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002071125825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mamtech1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024â estimated from Telegramâs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mamtech1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 11,012 | -19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 11,031 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 11,035 | +7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:21 | 11,028 | -8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 11,036 | +10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 11,026 | +10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 11,016 | -6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 11,022 | +16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 11,006 | +28 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 10,978 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 10,991 | +18 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 10,973 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 10,986 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 10,990 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 10,997 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 10,998 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 10,998 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 â the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelâs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegramâs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ viewsâ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramâs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (4 July 2026 â 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,935 |
| Reactions total | 39 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface â not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than âcorrectingâ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form â 8.12K, 3.7M â so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded â read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel â not this channelâs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramâs own rounded chrome, so it carries no â mark.
40 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ð | 30 | 75.0% | |
| ð¥ | 6 | 15.0% | |
| ð | 3 | 7.50% | |
| â¡ | 1 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities â ð is thanks in one channel and mourning in another â so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one â 4.34K, 1.2M â so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramâs own count on each post â not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above â those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by âa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageâ.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
áá€áµ áጠáá³á«á ? á°ááªáᜠáá€á³ážáá ášá°á á ááµ ááá ááá°á ášá°ááµ ááá® áááášáµ ááœááᢠá áá€á³ážá áá á á¬á³ ášááá«ážá ášááá 5/6 áááµ á á¬á³ ášáá ášá¢á« áá ášáá°á£ážá ááááá¢
áš70,000 á áá á°ááªáᜠá©áášááµá² ááá£á áš12á ááá áá°á áá€áµ á áá¥á! á°áá³á: 550,210 á°ááªáᜠá«áá: 70,544 (12.8%) á°áá¥á® á³áááµ: 16.5% áá á á«á á³áááµ: 8.33% ášáá°á áá€áµ (á°áá¥á® á³áááµ): ð áááµ: 591.6/600 â áŠá³ áµáá»á áŠáá²áá (á á³á) ð áŽáµ: 583/600 â á¥áá á£á« á áá ááµá áµáá ááµ á€áµ " áááµá® á«áááµ ááá³áµ áá€áµ áá á²áá»ážá ášá°á»á á°á᪠áá¥á á«áá á ááá ášáááá áá ášá¬áá²á«á á°á᪠áá¥á áááá³áᢠáµááµ áááá ášáááá á á°ááášá° áá ááášá« áá¥á¡ áá°ááµ ášáááᜠááááᢠ" áá®áá°á á¥ááá áá (ášáµáá ááµ áááµáµá)
ð¥°ð¥°
ð1
â áá¥á áá ááááµ ! ðš áµáááááá áááµ ááµá á«áá á°á add ášáááá á áá«á áµáŠá³ á«ááá ð ð á¥á«á ášáá«á áá ášá áá á ááᜠášáážášááµ ááá¥ááµ áá¥á«ážá áµááµ áá?
Signed Selefya Wave ð
á¢áá» á áá á á áᥠáá ð https://t.me/mamtech1
ð5
ášáá á áááµááœáá ášá°áá«ášá¡ áªáµá®áᜠá áá áá á²áá¡ á á³áá«ážá áá áᢠá³áªá© áᥠáá°á¥á«áᣠá áá«á³ ášá±áá« áá²á£ááœá á«á³áá á¥áá± á°ááᎠáááµááœá ááᢠá ááá áá ášáá á«á ááµáµá® ááᢠá á£á á«á³áááá áá€á ášáá«á áááá©á€ á°áᜠá¥áá á«á á á«áµá ááááᢠáµáá á°á áá á áá á¥áá±á áá°á³áœ á«áážáá ááµá ášá ááášáµá áŒá ááá£ážá ááᢠá ááᥠá ááááµá£ážááᢠ«áá ášáá á áá áá á¢á«áµá ááá áá á!» á²á ášá áá áá€á áá«áᢠá¥áá á¢áá á¥áá áá áááµááœá á¢á«áá¥ááဠá°áᬠá áá ááá£á áááµá ášá áášá¥á°ááᢠáá á°áá ááá± ášáá á áá á£áµá ááá ááᢠá áá á á áááá© ášááµá áá«ááœá£ ášá°á ážáá§áᜠááááá âŠ
ð3
https://t.me/mam_quote2
áááᜠâ á£áá á áµ/á€áµ ááá»áœáá áŽá©áá á£ááá ášáá á¥áááµ á°ášá³á®áœ á¥á» á ááá©á£ážá ááááá³á áµ/á€á¶áœ á á³áµáá¡á¢ á áá± ááá á«á¶áá®áœ áµ/á€áµ á áµáá¥á¶áµá€ ášá¬á á²áášá á¬á á²ááᵠ«á áµáá» á áᢠ٠٠تجاÙس تÙارث! á¢áµááá áµ/á€á¶áœ á°áá â áááµ á¥á«á³áœáá ášáá©á¢ á¥áá³á ášááá á°á ášááááá ášáá³ááá ááá¢
á¥ááá°á á°á³á°áá á°á á! á á«ááá³ážá áá ášáášá 59 á¥á á¥á» áá! á á¢áµá®áµá« ááŽá«á áááµ ááµá¥ áš20 áááµ á áá á«áááááµ ášá³áµ á¢ááµááá°á á ááµááµ áœáááµ á¥á á€á°á°áŠá»ážáᣠá áááá ášá²áá³á áááᜠáá¥ááµ ááµá¥ ááµáá áš1.3 ááášá á¥á á áá á°áááááᢠáá³á© ášá°ááášá «á€áµ áá á¥á á áá áš70 áºá á¥áµáš 100 áºá á¥á áá¥á«áµ áá»áá» á áá áá á á«á áá²á« áá á ááᣠá á³áá ááµá³ááá« ááᢠášá€áµ á¥áá€áµ ášáááœá á£áá€á³ážá ááá©á á áá á ááá¬áœáá áµáµááášáဠáá° áŽááá«á á¥á ááµáµá á áá©áᜠá ááá£áµ «á áá£á£ áŠáááá áááµÂ» á áá£á á á°áá ááá á ááµá¥ áµáá£ááœá¢ á áá áá£áªáá¹ á°ááœá ááá¥ááµ ášá°á«á âŠ
ááá á á á°á ááµ áá á«áµ ášááµááá ášá³áœ á£áá ááá ááááᥠáµáœááṠᢠðððð @Alif_jema_online_qirat_center áááá á¥á ááááᥠááœáá
ð1
á°áá! áᬠáµá computer á ááá áµáᜠá¥áááá ᢠá®áááá°á áá á á ááá á¥ááŽáµ á¥áá°ááá á«ááá?á²áœááµ áá á«á á ááá¥áá? ========================= âááááªá« Ge'ez 10 Software á«áášá± á¥á install á«áµáááµ ášáá á ááá ááá áµáµááá power ge'ez status phonetic Unicode Mode (á) áá á«áµáááµ á English ááá áµáµááá á°áá power ge'ez status English Mode (á¢) áá á áµáááµ ášáá ášáášá°ááµá á£áá áááá« á áµááá áááášá±á¢ âáâH_áâHu_áâHi_áâHa_áâHy_á âHe_áâHo âáâL_áâLu_áâLi_áâLa_áâLy_áâLe_áâLo âáâShift+h_áâŠ
áµáááµ áµáá®á»áœá ááá á¥ááŽáµ ááááµ á áá¥áâŠ? á áá«á³ á°áá£á«áµá ášáá«ášáááá áµ áµáááµ áµááá á£áµáª á áá¥ááµ á¥á«áá á°áœáášáá? ášá°áá«á© áµáá¶áœá á°á á áá ášáµáááá á£áµáª á¢á«ááµ áá áá á¥áá²á«áµá á áááµáµ á¥ášáµ á áµáááá? á áŽááááá ááµá ášá°á°áá© á£ááá«áᜠášáµáá«áœá á£áµáª á áá¥ááµ á¥á«áá ášááážáášá á á¶áµáµ áááá«á¶áœ áááá áááááᢠášááááªá«á á áµáááµ áµáá®á»áœá ášá«ááážá áá°áá áªá«áᜠáá¥ááµ á¥á á¥á«áá áá ááá á³ááá á°ášáá°á á£áµáª áá¥áá³ážá ááᢠášáµáááµ áµáá«áœá áá ááá á¥áá á áááá áááµá áááá ášá£áµáª á¥áµáá ášáá«á³á¥á áááµ ááᢠá¶áµá°áá á¥á áááá ášá£áµáª á áááµá ášáá«á³á¥ášá á°á¥á á á£ááá«áâŠ
ð1
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @mamtech1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked â was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it â t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so â1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@mamtech1 edited 1 post after it first published â the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too â this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank â 507,412 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below â republished posts weigh more than named mentions â and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelâs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page â a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel â every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched â that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayâs namer to yesterdayâs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason â naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides â the âNamed by N registered channelsâ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly â each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseâs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramâs list for THAT channel, not this one â see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 â this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
âð»áŽáŽáŽ áŽáŽáŽÊ áŽáŽáŽÊÉŽáŽÊáŽÉ¢Ê ɪɎsáŽÉªáŽáŽáŽáŽð²â (@mamtech1), 11,012 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mamtech1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.