Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for غَـيـث

Channel

غَـيـث

@ghith_10

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

370subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001466589071
TypeChannel
Username@ghith_10
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ghith_10

Growth

370371370.56 August 2026 — 371 subscribers6 August 2026 — 371 subscribers15 August 2026 — 370 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 370–371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:43370-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:46371no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:33371first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 370 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.0
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total312
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1090.9%
👍19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC27 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ihsanmahmoud

جواد .. خيّر .. طيب .. سمح .. هين كل ذلك سلام لك إلا أن تكون مباحاً للنهب هناك لا سلام بل حرب على الطامعين .. كن طيباً ولكن غير مستباح

👍1

Signed Ahmed 🌒

30 Jul 2026, 21:30 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ihsanmahmoud

مَن تدخره لأيامك الصعبة .. قد لا يكون من اخترته أنت لنفسك بل من اختاره الله هو أعلم بالأبر والأوفى

1

Signed Ahmed 🌒

26 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC60 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mihad_osol

من عجيب دعاء النَّبيِّ ﷺ: "اللَّهُمَّ ما رزقتَني ممَّا أحِبُّ؛ فاجعله قوةً لي فيما تحِبُّ، وما زويتَه عنِّي ممَّا أحِبُّ، فاجعله فراغًا لي فيما تحِبُّ"! [أخرجه الترمذي من حديث عبدالله بن يزيد الخطمي رضي الله عنه بإسناد يحتمل التحسين]. تأمَّلْ في مخرج هذا الدُّعاء النَّبويِّ الشَّريف، واعجبْ لما فيه من توفير جميع محابِّ العبد على محابِّ الرَّبِّ، فإنَّ العبدَ يدور بين حالتَيْن لا ثالث لهما: - إمَّا أن يُعطى ما يُحِب

Signed Ahmed 🌒

26 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC50 viewsread 6 August 2026

•• الوعدُ دَينٌ يُعقَدُ بلا شاهد، ويُستَهانُ به لأنّ قضاءَه لا يُطالَبُ به أحد. غير أنّ النفوسَ تُحصي ما وُعِدَت وإن لم تنطق، فتنقصُ ثقةُ الناسِ بك درجةً في كلِّ مرّةٍ من غيرِ أن يقولوا شيئًا. فأكثرُ ما تُهدَمُ به المكانةُ وعودٌ صغيرةٌ نُسِيَت، لا مواقفُ كبيرةٌ خُذِلَت. •• - علي آل حواء

Signed Ahmed 🌒

21 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC59 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @badrth313

خذها من أخيك: من قواعد الورد القرآني أنْ إذا هبّت رياحك فلا تغتنمها. نعم لا تغتنمها. ومقصودي؛ إذا كان وردك في اليوم جزءًا واحدًا، وسرت عليه مدة، ثم تاقت نفسك في يوم أن تقرأ جزءًا آخر فلا تجعله من ختمتك تلك، وإنما افتح ختمة جديدة اسمها ختمة النفحات؛ كلما زاد على وردك تكمله هناك في ختمة النفحات. لأن النفس إذا فترت بدأت تنظر بمنطق التعويض، فإذا قرأت في يوم جزءين من نفس الختمة -ووردك جزء واحد- فستقول نفسك: لن أتلو اليوم

Signed Ahmed 🌒

20 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC73 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

وليسَ خليلي بالملولِ ولا الذي ‏إذا غِبتُ عنهُ باعني بِخليل ‏ولكن خليلي من يدوم وِصَالهُ ‏ويحفظ سِرِّي عند كُلِّ خليل

Signed Ahmed 🌒

17 Jul 2026, 22:01 UTC60 viewsread 6 August 2026

لكل صِدِّيق آية و دالة . أما الآية فأنه الثابت في الفارين القائم في القاعدين الذاكر في الغافلين أما الدالة فأنه يقول .. فيُنْفِذُ الله ما يقول -إحسان زرزر

Signed Ahmed 🌒

17 Jul 2026, 21:57 UTC61 viewsread 6 August 2026

[لهم مايشاءون فيها ولدينا مزيد]. ‏قال أنس: «يتجلىٰ الله لهم في كل جمعة».

Signed Ahmed 🌒

17 Jul 2026, 13:53 UTC65 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ghaith_Al_Wahi

عند سؤال الله أمور الدنيا: شتَّان بين داعٍ ناقمٍ من حاله وكأنه لم يرَ خيرا من ربه.. وبين داعٍ ممتنٍ لمولاه يسأله المزيد من فضله.

Signed Ahmed 🌒

14 Jul 2026, 22:15 UTC77 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Rwam1

"من أمارات النضج العقلي والاعتدال النفسي أن يتسع صدرك لتفهم أحوال الآخرين وأن تجعل لهم مساحةً واسعةً للعذر والتغاضي، فكل إنسان عنده ما يشغله من الأعمال والهموم ومتاعب الحياة وظروفها… إلخ، وليس كل أحد يقدر على كشف عذره لك في كل حال، وليس كل عذر يحسن البوح به. لا تكن ثقيلًا بعتابك، مُلِحًّا في سؤالك، سريعًا في خصامك؛ لئلا ينفر الناس منك ويبغضوا طلعتك يا محور الكون"

Signed Ahmed 🌒

14 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC74 viewsread 6 August 2026

ما أَحسَنَ الأَيّامَ إِلّا أَنَّها يا صاحِبَيَّ إِذا مَضَت لَم تَرجِعِ • البحتري.

Signed Ahmed 🌒

13 Jul 2026, 22:24 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

قيل للقعقاع الأوسي: ‏قل لنا شيئاً عن الجنة يشوقنا إليها؟ ‏قال: فيها رسول ﷲ ﷺ.

3

Signed Ahmed 🌒

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ghith_10. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 525,710 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“غَـيـث” (@ghith_10), 370 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghith_10.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.