«لَو أَرَادَ اللّٰهُ أَمرًا…سَخَّرَ الأَقدَارَ جُندًا».

Channel
قناة: غَيث مُزن.
@ghaith_mozn2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,795subscribers
+296 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001372477877 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ghaith_mozn2 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ghaith_mozn2 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 12,795 | -3 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 12,798 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 12,799 | +4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 12,795 | +11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 12,784 | +19 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 12,765 | +18 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:59 | 12,747 | +21 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:44 | 12,726 | +10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 12,716 | +13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:06 | 12,703 | +20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 12,683 | +19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 12,664 | +7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 12,657 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 12,656 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 12,654 | +8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 12,646 | +9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 12,637 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 12,633 | +15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 12,618 | +21 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 12,597 | first reading |
Engagement
131 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.69%
- avg views ÷ 12,795 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,110
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 131 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 131 (30 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 15,571 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 21:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
___ «سبحانكَ من إلــهٍ قهرت بقدرتِكَ الصِّعاب، وفتحت برحمتِكَ الأبواب، لكَ الحمـــــــدُ مِلءَ عرشك،ومدّاد كلماتك، ومُنتهـى رِضاك، لكَ الحمدُ في الأُولى والآخِرة، حمد مَنْ رآكَ في كلّ شـيء، ووجـدكَ عندَ كلّ ضيق».
Sticker, posted without a caption
~~~~~~ "عليكَ يا ربَّـــــاهُ تُكـلان الخُطـى وإليكَ سارتْ والعزائمُ صادقاتْ وجْلَــى وتلتحفُ التصبُّــــرَ عُـدةً ويســرُّها ألا تحيـــدَ عنِ الثبـاتْ ترجُــو علــومًا طيِّبــــــاتٍ نفعُها مقبولةً فوقَ السمــاءِ السابعاتْ».
`في سرورٍ متَّصلٍ أبدا`
Sticker, posted without a caption
'الحمدُ للمنّانِ'.
'المنَّانُ: كثيرُ العطاء، عظيم المواهِب، واسع الإحسان.
•المَنّان: «الذي يَجودُ بالنَّوالِ قبل السُّؤال».
Sticker, posted without a caption
«صلى عليكَ الله ما عبدٌ دعَا للهِ مُبتهـلاً بليــــلٍ أجــوفِ».
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @ghaith_mozn2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@zkryu · 142 postsالـمُــزْنُ ...☁️🌱
@Al_mzn33 · 541 postإزهَـار🌱
@Aljuod5 · 751 postغنِيمَة 💛.
@Ghanima9 · 661 postخطواتُ نورْ
@StepsNoor0 · 1,3591 postاحفظ الله يحفظك
@ehfad_allah · 21 postغيمة ذكر 🌿
@gyhdtt · 491 postمَـلاذ🤍.
@m_n1443 · 13,8071 postسحابًا | 🫧
@manal11l · 4331 postمشكاة 🌿
@mishkaatt · 4311 postرَوح
@souliik · 901 postورَف .
@woaraf · 941 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Ghith_quran · 22,899
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
@ha13ii · 29,638
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
@s_1442 · 29,349
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
@afkar50 · 29,715
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
@waadQuraan · 32,556
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
@algomaaan · 61,736
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
@rfdalkhayr · 21,736
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
@ghymteata · 22,583
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
@AlHoQla · 70,498
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
@algran1 · 77,820
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
@princsh12 · 28,854
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
@w_t_m_q · 29,388
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
@safaalro7 · 23,950
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
@aisha3n · 26,867
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
@rawaablog · 43,783
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
@ta7fizquran · 60,851
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
@kamstreh1442 · 52,014
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
@HolyMosq · 164,303
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@blagha1 · 28,300
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
@thequransave1 · 20,550
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 September 2026
@Ebrahem_Al_Akhdar · 23,737
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
@kfayef · 35,400
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
@fatima_alkariri · 24,834
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
@kaneetat44 · 94,622
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة: غَيث مُزن.” (@ghaith_mozn2), 12,795 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghaith_mozn2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.