中国人能干。
😁1
Signed Winnien

Channel
@chomebanchigo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
838subscribers
+47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003945499733 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chomebanchigo |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chomebanchigo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 838 | +41 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 797 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 791 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 791 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,179 |
| Reactions total | 116 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
116 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 83 | 71.6% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 6.03% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 5.17% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 5.17% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 3.45% | |
| 🥱 | 4 | 3.45% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
中国人能干。
😁1
Signed Winnien
新中国也有太監。 卡西方脖子就靠這套了。
😁6
Signed Winnien
为什么中国没实现民主? 别扯什么儒家、秦制、支性,乱七八糟的,答案只有一个,苏联在中国扶持了一个叫中国共产党的组织,然后就是历史上的内亚对东亚的再征服,支不过是被历史大势推着走的国家
😁3❤2💩1🤡1
Signed 戦慄のビッチ猫
Photo, posted without a caption
😁4✍1
Signed Winnien
除了习近平还有谁能让高官跳楼、心脏病死亡、蹲监狱? 能不支持吗? 很多小知识分子说改革开放是邓碾平的功劳,我说没有毛爹打倒苏联你个康米开放个屁,门都不会给你打开 毛爹证明了支打不打的了胜仗不好说,但送死还是没问题,所以当上了世界第二大经济体 台湾民主搞了几十年,总不能实力还不如独裁国家吧 台湾自身也有问题,日本来了投降日本,蒋介石来了投降蒋介石,如果当时拉起一支军队赶走或政治庇护蒋介石,直接独立,那现在台湾就是蒙古国类似的生态位,没人和你谈统一 台需要一场战争证明自己,日本有美压着,台湾赢了就是新的亚洲话事人
😁5🤡2👍1💩1
Signed 戦慄のビッチ猫
餓了。
😁4😱4❤1👏1
Signed Winnien
以前合肥上班遇到一个23岁年轻人,说父母在上海做生意有房有车,后面我就跟他说我支付宝黑卡VIP2看看他级别,一句话就把他噎死了。后面从一个女同事那里知道他支付宝都黑户了,找别人借钱还要打到他卡里,现在这个社会看一支付宝就知道什么经济水平
🤡4
Signed J C
還自豪上了,瞧你驕傲的。 而且你姥爺那幫紅衛兵當年是大鳴大放大字報搞游行,踢開黨委鬧革命,砸爛高官狗頭。 今天的中共不就是反革命的走資派法西斯嗎,什麼根正苗紅的,貼張大字報鬧個革命試試。 武漢大學神人太多了吧。
😁10❤1
Signed Winnien
有名韓團ENHYPEN的日籍粉絲暱稱Mina,她在凌晨的直播中結束了自己的性命。 Mina長得十分漂亮,今年26歲的她,在就讀立教大學期間就開始擔任酒店小姐,曾創下一年營業額1億日圓的驚人成績。 私底下的她則熱衷追星,最愛的是日韓合作的男子K-POP偶像團體「ENHYPEN」。她將在酒店工作賺來的大筆收入投入追星,因此不只粉絲知道她,就連成員也都知道這位出手闊綽的粉絲。 MIina最支持的是團內唯一的日本籍成員西村力。七月底的演唱會上,Mina在觀眾席前排希望成員金善禹把手中的向日葵遞給西村力,金善禹接著遞過去,但西村力當時忙著與粉絲互動,最後花束並沒有成功送到他手上,而是被退還給Mina。 這件事本來也沒甚麼。但後來西村力在自己的直播中聊起演唱會上粉絲應援行為缺乏邊界感:「演唱會應該是讓所有人都能感到幸福的地方。但有人為了讓自己被記住而刻意表現,這點讓我覺得很遺憾。」雖然沒有指名道姓,但網友瞬間就把矛頭對準了Mina。…
😁6
Signed Winnien
9.15新規上路後,想出境的跑蛆記得要把手機裡的浪新和百麗宮清乾淨啊。😋 Source:trust me bro、Danil Rohas、紅色貴族
😁8❤1
Signed Winnien
群主Winnien你好,我想匿名投稿。 安倍晋三被杀的那一天,我正在上韩语课,课间几个同学聊到此事,欢呼雀跃,犹嫌不够,还发了朋友圈庆祝。我什么也没说,把发朋友圈庆祝的人都屏蔽了。当晚就在只有学生在的群里收到他们的大辱骂,此后就是每天上课见到我都会翻的白眼。 还有一个非常温柔善良的姐姐,某一天饭后散步,聊到韩国的梨泰院事故,姐姐用温柔的语气说:没什么好同情的,是韩国人,所以活该。那一刻我感觉到连后背都在起鸡皮疙瘩。 此后再遇见国人,我都万般谨慎+小心,不敢深交。 善良是会被孤立、被指责的,仇恨才是正确的——无法想象是什么样的教育可以把人异化至此。人之初性本善,他们的善是经历了什么才会变成如此的恶?很可怕,真的很可怕。后来我再看到在国内的亲戚生下的可爱的小孩,都会忍不住想,以后他们会接受什么样的教育,会能够出淤泥而不染、坚持自己的善意、好好长大吗?
😁7❤1🌚1
Signed Winnien
當年,日本。
😁9
Signed Winnien
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @chomebanchigo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 47,451 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“日本の家” (@chomebanchigo), 838 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chomebanchigo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.