Channel
@gerardopisarello
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
246subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001442049452 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gerardopisarello |
| Description | Constitucionalista republicà. Candidat a l'alcaldia per Barcelona en comú i diputat de Comuns per Barcelona |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gerardopisarello |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @gerardopisarello/1540 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC | @bcnencomu/951929 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @bcnencomu | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @gerardopisarello — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 246 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:40 | 246 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 247 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,664 |
| Reactions total | 62 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
62 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 90.3% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 9.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Aquesta setmana m’he trobat amb arquitectes i urbanistes per entendre com s’ha construït Barcelona i pensar la ciutat del futur. Però pensar el futur també exigeix mirar de cara els problemes del present. I l’exposició Barcelona 2035 mostra la manca de visió i les contradiccions del govern de Collboni. Gairebé no hi apareixen ni l’emergència habitacional, ni la crisi climàtica, ni les cures, ni la centralitat dels b…
❤2
👉La inseguretat és un problema real. Però quan les institucions deixen un buit, hi ha qui intenta omplir-lo amb por, odi i falsos culpables. 👂Davant els episodis de violència viscuts a La Marina, les entitats del barri han tornat a fer el que sempre han fet: escoltar, organitzar-se i sostenir la comunitat. 💜I aquesta feina té noms de dona. A Cases Barates, Sant Cristòfol, Can Clos i arreu de La Marina, són sobretot…
❤1👍1
Lo ocurrido en Ceuta es, antes que nada, una tragedia humana. Personas que buscaban una vida digna han sido empujadas a arriesgar sus vidas y utilizadas como instrumento de presión política. Pero no podemos mirarlo como un episodio aislado. Detrás hay intereses geopolíticos, el chantaje del régimen marroquí y una extrema derecha internacional que necesita convertir las personas migrantes en enemigas. Su objetivo es…
❤11
🏘 La Marina sap què passa quan un barri és una prioritat. I també què passa quan deixa de ser-ho. 🏗Durant els nostres mandats, van arribar el metro, nous equipaments i inversió social i comunitària. Un impuls que va començar a reconnectar el barri amb la resta de la ciutat. 💸Però aquests canvis necessitaven continuïtat. I avui, la desinversió i la manca de recursos es tornen a notar. Primer els barris. Primer, la …
🌳Fa dies que torno a sentir el mateix argument: que els carrers verds fan pujar els lloguers. Jo no ho comparteixo. El que fa pujar els preus és l'especulació, la manca d'habitatge públic i la falta de regulació. 🏡 En plena emergència climàtica i habitacional, no accepto que ens facin triar entre barris més saludables i el dret a continuar vivint-hi. Barcelona necessita més arbres, més habitatge assequible i menys e…
❤7
🔥Davant dels incendis, primer de tot: solidaritat amb les persones afectades i tot el suport als bombers i als serveis d’emergència que s’hi estan deixant la pell. ❌Mentre el país crema, Ayuso i Abascal continuen negant l’emergència climàtica i atacant les polítiques de prevenció. Les onades de calor extremes i els incendis seran cada vegada més freqüents. La resposta no poden ser més privatitzacions ni més aeroport…
👍2
No hi ha millor manera d'entendre un barri que recórrer-lo amb la gent que el viu. Aquest cap de setmana hem passejat per La Clota amb les veïnes que fa anys que en cuiden la memòria. En una ciutat que canvia tan ràpid, hi ha barris que ens recorden que el més important no són només els edificis, també són els vincles, les històries compartides i la gent que s'organitza perquè aquests llocs continuïn tenint ànima. L…
❤6👍1
Bon dia! Avui publico aquest article a eldiario.es. Hi proposo una reflexió que intenta anar una mica més enllà del soroll quotidià i mirar un personatge ben conegut des d'una perspectiva diferent. Si us ve de gust llegir-lo, aquí el teniu. I, com sempre, m'interessarà saber què us suggereix. 📰 Podeu llegir-lo aquí: https://www.eldiario.es/opinion/tribuna-abierta/zapatero-borgeano_129_13405868.html
❤4👍2
Sí. En un moment en que amb l'excusa de la "preferència del nacional" creixen els discursos d'odi i els intents de criminalitzar i dividir les classes populars, Barcelona ha d'aixecar la veu. L'entrevista era de El Mundo. Gens fàcil. Però el periodista ha fet la seva feina de manera respectuosa i professional 😊 👉🏼 Podeu llegir-la aquí COMPARTEIX! 📸 a Instagram
❤11
L'Herminia diu que no hi ha millor remei contra la calor que un bon salmorejo. Avui m'ha convidat a casa seva, a la Prosperitat, i m'ha ensenyat alguns secrets perquè quedi així de bo. I mentre preparàvem el dinar hem acabat parlant dels estius que cada vegada són més durs, dels barris on la calor es nota més i de què podem fer perquè ningú hagi de passar un estiu insuportable a casa seva. Perquè la crisi climàtica…
❤8
M’han demanat què faria com a alcalde de Barcelona davant la calor extrema. Doncs bé: més verd, més refugis climàtics, piscines gratuïtes i ajudes per refrigerar les llars. Protegir-se de la calor no pot ser un privilegi. L’Ajuntament ha d’actuar ja i si no ho fa, ho farem nosaltres el 2027. Ho explico a 20 MINUTOS👇🏻 https://www.20minutos.es/cataluna/barcelona/dormir-verano_7017308_3.html
❤6
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @gerardopisarello. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 603,552 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | No label recorded on this Wikidata item |
|---|---|
| Description | Deputy Mayor of Barcelona |
| X / Twitter | @G_Pisarello |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gerardo Pisarello” (@gerardopisarello), 246 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gerardopisarello.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.