Channel
@geldhelden
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20,565subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001848781746 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @geldhelden |
| Description | In dieser Gruppe lernst du, wie du dein Geld vor Inflation, Kontrolle und Enteignung schützt – mit Fakten, Lösungen und Erfahrung. Keine Panikmache. Kein Hype. Nur Klartext über Alternativen, die funktionieren. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/geldhelden |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 20,565 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 20,563 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 20,572 | +13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 20,559 | +20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 20,539 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 20,538 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 20,538 | first reading |
64 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 64 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 64 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 100,413 |
| Reactions total | 403 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
403 reactions across 49 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 114 | 28.3% | |
| 👍 | 85 | 21.1% | |
| 🤬 | 66 | 16.4% | |
| 💯 | 46 | 11.4% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 6.20% | |
| 🤔 | 24 | 5.96% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 2.48% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 1.99% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 1.49% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.993% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.993% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 0.993% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.744% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 0.744% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.248% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dein Geld auf dem Konto verliert jeden Tag real an Wert. Und dein Bankberater hat dir nicht die ganze Wahrheit gesagt. Aktien, ETFs, Sparbuch — das ist nur EINE fragile Speiche von sieben. Vermögende Familien nutzen seit Jahrhunderten ein ganz anderes System: sieben Sachwert-Speichen, die Inflation, digitalen Euro und Lastenausgleich strukturell aushebeln. Einstieg schon ab 3.000 Euro. Kein Bankberater, kein Auswan…
1,4 Billionen Dollar geborgtes Geld an den Börsen – und niemand spricht offen darüber, was passiert, wenn das kippt. Die Verschuldung ist längst außer Kontrolle. Ein Domino-Effekt könnte 2008 wie einen harmlosen Vorgeschmack wirken lassen. Physische Edelmetalle, Bitcoin in Eigenverwahrung und Bargeld als Notfallpuffer: Das ist, worüber wir reden. Wie nah bist du dran, dein Kapital wirklich zu schützen? Schreib's in …
😱2
Dein Konto gesperrt, nicht von Hackern, sondern von einer Behörde. Wie schnell kann das gehen? Wer sein gesamtes Geld nur auf deutschen Konten hält, sitzt auf einem echten Klumpenrisiko. Ein legales Konto in Georgien zum Beispiel ist kein Steuertrick, du meldest alles korrekt, aber dein Geld liegt nicht mehr in einem einzigen Korb. Und eine Aufenthaltsoption im Ausland? Besser früh regeln als in der Krise. 🔑 #Finan…
🔥2
🎙️ Jetzt anhören
🔍 PARAGUAY: DER GEHEIME FINANZSAFE, DEN DU NICHT KENNST! 🛡️ Sicher wie Fort Knox: Genossenschaftskonten in Paraguay unterliegen strengen lokalen Vorschriften, die von der paraguayischen Zentralbank überwacht werden. Die Ausfallrate ist dort geringer als der globale Durchschnitt! 💼 Mythen entlarvt: Viele halten diese Konten für unsicher. Doch die Realität sieht anders aus – Paraguay hat in den letzten Jahren enorme …
👍1💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
Freiheits-Update: Die 5 heißesten News am 12. August 2026 🔥 1. Deutschlands Steuer-Jäger bekommen KI, Daten-Center und bis zu 15 Jahre Knast 🚨 Der 26-Punkte-Aktionsplan gegen Steuer- und Finanzkriminalität geht in die nächste Runde: AI-Mustererkennung, blockchain-Tracing, längere Aufbewahrungsfristen und schwere Steuerhinterziehung wird wieder zum Verbrechen. 👉 Erkenntnis: Wer noch glaubt, „die finden mich nicht“, l…
👍3💯3❤1
Stagflation: Die Wirtschaft schwächelt, aber alles wird teurer. Wie soll man da sein Erspartes schützen? Für Zentralbanken ist das ein echtes Dilemma. Senken sie die Zinsen, droht die Inflation zurückzukommen. Lassen sie sie hoch, leidet die Wirtschaft weiter. Gold, Silber oder breit gestreute Sachwerte können ein Teil der Antwort sein, denn eines ist klar: Wer alles auf Papiergeld setzt, riskiert, dass seine Kaufkr…
🔥2💯1
WO WÜRDEST DU LIEBER LEBEN? DUBAIS GLITZER ODER GEORGIENS GEMÜTLICHKEIT? 🤔 🤑 Dubai lockt mit steuerlichen Vorteilen — null Prozent Einkommensteuer! Perfekt für Unternehmer und Digitale Nomaden. 💼 Georgien besticht durch niedrige Lebenshaltungskosten. Ein komfortables Leben für 1.000 bis 1.500 Euro pro Monat? Kein Problem! 🌐 Unternehmensgründung: In Dubai blitzschnell und weltvernetzt. In Georgien super einfach und…
❤3🤔3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Ab 12. August killt die EU tausende kleine Online-Shops. Absichtlich. Die neue EU-Verpackungsverordnung zwingt jeden Händler, der auch nur ein einziges Paket ins EU-Ausland schickt, sofort einen eigenen Bevollmächtigten vor Ort zu stellen. Keine Mindestmenge, keine Ausnahme für kleine Betriebe. Wer sich das nicht leisten kann, muss den Versand einstellen, und am Ende bleiben nur die Giganten übrig. 📦 #Mittelstand #…
🤬15❤6👎3🤮1
Rolex gehört keinem Aktionär und keinem Erben – und zahlt trotzdem kaum Steuern. Wie macht die das? Die Antwort steckt in der Struktur. Hans Wilsdorf hat Rolex in eine gemeinnützige Stiftung überführt: keine Dividenden, keine Veröffentlichungspflicht, kein Zugriff von außen. Stiftungen und Trusts klingen nach altem Geld – funktionieren aber auch für ganz normale Vermögen, wenn man rechtzeitig anfängt. 💡 #Vermögenss…
👏2❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @geldhelden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,124,571 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Geldhelden – Freiheit durch Wissen” (@geldhelden), 20,565 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geldhelden.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.