Channel
@geekplux_lab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
664subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001140878120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @geekplux_lab |
| Description | 随便发发，读了的，看到的，所思所想的。 闲聊：https://t.me/+F2FGJ9lGt3VhYTU9 频道主 blog: https://geekplux.com/ 私聊 https://t.me/geekplux |
| Created | Between 1 May 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/geekplux_lab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 664 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 664 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 April 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 169 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
117 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 45 | 38.5% | |
| ❤ | 41 | 35.0% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 14.5% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 8.55% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
七月初老婆孩子回来之后，家里欢声笑语多了很多，不再是我孤单一人了！当然随之而来的我个人时间也少了很多，除了上班基本上就是带娃，没有时间想一些长远的事情。 表达欲（网络上）也下降明显，主要原因是有家人在很多事可以随口就说给他们，然后得到各种反馈，比发在网上要好很多；次要原因是最近比较迷茫，一方面看着 AI 每天越来越强感觉自己很没价值，另一方面是当了 manager 之后不干“实事”也很没成就感。 > 稍微展开一下，在公司呆了七年，如果想摸鱼的话基本上可以以一种十分舒服的方式摸很久，而当了manager 之后，我的 avalibility 变重要了，要随时在线，不停有消息和邮件要回，但成就感降低了很多，每天做的事可能是画大饼、研究人事关系、发邮件解决blockers、开会总结陈词。有时候你也不知道团队里各位表现好是他们自己好，还是你的所谓“管理”真的有在起作用。。。 不过工作本来在我生活中的优先级就不是第一位的，所以也还好。…
❤16
Signed GeekPlux
拍了 227 张照片和视频，感觉能剪辑一个 vlog 了。
🤣1
Signed GeekPlux
https://fixupx.com/geekplux/status/2068854047973556460
👍2
Signed GeekPlux
看了两天房，看了一个有泳池的房子，真不错啊😁可惜位置离上班太远了。不过总感觉自己的预算还是太低了所以一直看不到有特别满意的房子。 明天去现场看世界杯⚽！！！现在已经很激动了！
Signed GeekPlux
这周健身房+网球+攀岩全勤啊，真有备战奥运的感觉了。 用家里的体重秤（那种靠电极估算的）称的体脂率从 16% 降到了 11%，体重还涨了 3kg。尽管我觉得我的体脂率没有这么低，但我的小肚子是真没有了，即使是吃的很撑，也只是稍微鼓起一些。我最受不了的就是有小肚腩，所以每次有肚子之后就会猛练一段时间。 不过这次明显感觉和年轻的时候，甚至三四年前完全不一样。代谢显著变慢了，不知道是不是年纪的原因。以前我是增肌比减脂难，现在是减脂比增肌难。 网球🎾和攀岩🧗双修真的不错，网球主要是下半身发力，上半身相当于是动力链的末端，胳膊主打一个随性甩出去。而攀岩目前我感觉上肢还是非常重要的，腿也发力但显然小于上肢。这两个运动叠加唯一的问题就是有点费小臂，所以为了避免受伤要尽量多休息，多按摩。 周末把家里收拾了一下，做家务也很解压。 最近在看《心态制胜》这本书，我本来想读英文原版的《The Inner Game of Tennis》不过效率…
👍12
Signed GeekPlux
外面下小雨，大家开车很慢，所以堵车回家竟然用了一个半小时。不过今天心情不错，回来的路上也不是很恼。 路上听了 https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1DKEG6aEP7 。锵锵三人行真的是我最喜欢的也是我唯一追了这么多年的访谈类节目了。这期是纪念他们开播 15 周年。从 1998 年开始算，这期应该是 2013 年播出的。 我入坑应该是跟着我爸，虽然很不愿意承认，但父亲对我的影响是深远的。我爸是每期必看，我也跟着每期必看，那时候凤凰台应该是我家打开时长最多的台。那时候的语境相当开放，大家也不会“咬文嚼字”和互扣帽子，和现在的比起来那真是政通人和。
❤5👏1
Signed GeekPlux
《从徒步到幸福》- 纪念结婚五周年 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFCtKJxjA3A
🥰10
Signed GeekPlux
对父亲的消息，我已经生理性厌恶了，找我十句话必然最后一句是借钱，然而从来没还过。
Signed GeekPlux
真是受不了 X 了，怎么那么多搬运的傻逼
🔥8
Signed GeekPlux
长假三天，总结来说就是休息好了。身心全方位休息好了。去健身房两次，打网球一次。因为下暴雨，所以也出不了太多门，但是还是坚持去健身房了。 还去看了几个房，现在对看房略有心得。但是下的几个 offer 都没成交，可能出的价太低了。搞不懂现在利率这么高竟然还有人抢着买房……我以为我已经算是反其道而行了。 游戏方面，沉浸式玩了玩《地平线》，本来想入门一下欧卡，发现 Mac 不能玩。 还有一个新的体验是，我终于去靶场打枪了，实弹射击。之前一直想找人带我一下，结果一直找不到合适的人。索性假期第一天我终于鼓起勇气去了。我进门就直接跟店员说，我没有打过枪，我第一次来，你能不能教我？结果店员非常友好，也非常耐心的教了我 15 分钟，我就直接上了。体验真的很不错，是一个很好的减压方式，以后得常来。 下周入门一下爬墙。
👍8❤1
Signed GeekPlux
今天又参加了团队内部组织的 Hackathon，一天时间，做出了之前感觉要至少三个人，一个月的工作量。 全程用了 Codex，没有打开任何 IDE 或 editor。编程失去了意义啊，更多的是对产品方向和 UI 细节的把控。 不过项目推进到 95% 的时候，就会遇到各种细节上的问题怎么也调不满意，可能最后的 5% 还得是由人类完成，但这 5% 的工作量会远超预期的大。打开 editor 一看代码量我直接傻了，合上电脑，下班....
Signed GeekPlux
上周基本上是表演型工作，很没意思，期间穿插了 OpenAI 员工培训，学到不少 codex 的用法，但实际上在企业中的大型项目管理和协作仍需要和真正的工程师沟通。所以之后约了 OpenAI 工程师团队的几个人来一起交流，学习一下他们是怎么企业级 vibe coding 的。 这周还有一个 hackathon，不过次轮都没进。全部代码都是 vibe 的，包括真实数据连接，现在 AI 还有什么事情做不了的呢？ 老板问我要不要多干点产品经理的活，我二话没说就答应了。😕 每天跟 07 年小伙子混在一起，让身体充满了动力。连续健身房和网球三天了。 我本来想着一天内要不是网球要不是健身房，二选一，结果小伙子反问我，为什么不能一起，先无氧完再有氧不是很合理吗🤣于是周五就这么干了，下午先去健身房练了肩背，吃了晚饭紧接着就打球，打到晚上十点，燃尽了🤣
👍6
Signed GeekPlux
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @geekplux_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 988,956 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GeekPlux Lab” (@geekplux_lab), 664 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geekplux_lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.