Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

101010

@OB101010

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001789542434
TypeChannel
Username@OB101010
Description我是 Liam,在这里分享值得记录的个人阅读和想法,包括科技新闻、工具、投资、职业发展和移民资讯等。欢迎订阅我的 Newsletter https://101010.zhubai.love/
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/OB101010

Growth

857 August 2026 — 85 subscribers9 August 2026 — 85 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 16:4785no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:2685first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
11
Links
295

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2025 to 16 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jan 2026, 03:48 UTC71 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/24/magazine/chloe-zhao-interview.html

5 Jan 2026, 04:41 UTC80 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://www.xiaoyuzhoufm.com/episode/6958ebc12db086f8976d70b0

23 Dec 2025, 02:55 UTC82 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @geekplux_lab

每一句都太真实了,有的东西我也在感同身受。我有时候质疑工作到底有什么意义,但有时候取得一些小小成绩的时候又觉得是自己的功劳。即使实际上我也知道,这其实就是平台的效应,跟我关系不大。 我现在对工作的理解,大部分都是在做表演,演戏,literally,你做的事情不会对这个世界有任何改变,只会在激情表演之后,你的领导得到了一些情绪价值,that's it。但如果不表演,那又去哪找活着的意义呢,怎么打发大块的时间呢?怎么再反过来感动一下自己呢?再实际一点,收入又如何稳定呢? 回答上面反问的理论上的答案,大家都知道,做自己的事情,为自己而活,但实际上都是一堆的取舍吧。等工作到被裁的那一天,也许就像视频中传达出的,是一种解脱后的豁达。只有经历一些特定 moment,人才能从死循环中清醒,大概都这样吧。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeMA9WGKxOg

1 Dec 2025, 18:52 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://innei.in/posts/experience/after-leaving-folo

😢1

28 Nov 2025, 14:35 UTC58 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://github.com/trungdq88/Awesome-Black-Friday-Cyber-Monday

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @OB101010. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“101010” (@OB101010), 85 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OB101010.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.