Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ты деген, Гарри

Channel

Ты деген, Гарри

@garri_degen

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,725subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291677847
TypeChannel
Username@garri_degen
Created2 July 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/garri_degen

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

4,7254,7434,7346 August 2026 — 4,743 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,738 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,732 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,727 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,725 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,722–4,746 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:224,725-2
12 Aug 2026, 11:094,727-5
9 Aug 2026, 15:174,732-6
6 Aug 2026, 13:514,738-5
6 Aug 2026, 04:364,743first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 10 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.8%
avg views ÷ 4,725 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,460
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.756%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held17 (10 April 202629 July 2026)
Views total2,910
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 36s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

216 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8238.0%
👍5726.4%
🆒2411.1%
🫡2411.1%
❤‍🔥115.09%
💯62.78%
👀52.31%
41.85%
🙏31.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
45
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @garri_degen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 April 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,680 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Что если превратить твой Claude/Hermes/Openclaw в Гига Брейна с крипто контекстом? Точнее в тысячи крипто смартов. Мы выкатили то, что я хотел выкатить уже два года – Moni API 2.0. Всё, что мы знаем про Смартов, Майндшейр, социальные и ончейн метрики, перетекание внимания и прочие радости теперь доступны в API. 15 000+ смарт аккаунтов, 1 000 000+ социальных событий каждый день, 5 лет истории данных. Если у тебя ес

12

23 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC≈1,230 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

💪 Добавили Moni данные и трейдинг в fomo terminal Мони скор, смарт фолловеры, смарт меншны, интересные кошельки, изменения хендла/био и многое другое теперь прямо в терминале, где вы уже торгуете. И это бесплатно. Сейчас работает на Ethereum и Solana сетях. Робинхуд, Бейз и БСК – будут скоро А и еще, комиссии — минус 90% в сравнении с другими терминалами. Поставить расширение: install link Торговый бот: @moniai_t

7🆒3

18 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC≈1,560 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Последние 14 Moni NFT Визарды появились почти случайно. Пять лет назад мы начали строить Moni инструменты, чтобы видеть, куда смотрят смарты до того, как это станет очевидным. А потом люди, которые пользовались продуктом, начали общаться между собой. Делиться находками, сверять заметки, кидать проекты в закрытый дискорд раньше, чем о них узнавали остальные. Так англоязычное сообщество стало большой частью продукта.

🆒73🫡1

14 Jul 2026, 21:04 UTC≈5,510 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Если у вас такой же вопрос, как у Макса Вайлда и hh, то… Вот вам видеогайд о том, как помечать хороших и не очень персонажей в Твиттере, терминалах и эксплорерах через расширение moni.ai Можно пометить как твиттер аккаунты, так и кошельки или контракты. Пользуйтесь, это еще и бесплатно, лол 👀 Ссылка на хром расширение

👍104

7 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC≈2,040 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❤️ Перейдите плез в Токс и пройдите небольшой опрос Буду очень благодарен

🫡1

3 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC≈5,770 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Попросил своего Хермес-агента с Мони мозгами дать апдейт по моему крипто портфелю. Смарты, социалка, ончейн, все дела. Лучший UX для такой задачи из всего, что я пробовал. Работает просто. Наговариваешь агенту свои действия или подвязываешь кошельки. Дальше просишь что угодно: графики, таблицы, любые срезы по позициям. Самое сильное, что агент собирает катализаторы и события, которые смарты обсуждают по твоим акти

🆒12🫡8

3 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTC≈2,140 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🫡 Три Дегена | Bichka | EP 33 Пятница. Стрим. Все как обычно, заходи. Мигель. Максон. Хонкайо. В первый раз слышишь? Заходи знакомиться. Обсудим новости уходящей недели. Сможет ли робинхуд чейн побить бэйз. почему адама токен воркс мудак. почему ансем это кринж. и почему солана умрет. (все это написал максончик) > YouTube Ждем тебя, анон ❤️

👍2

19 Jun 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,290 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Никто не пришел на мою фан встречу, а точнее не оставил фидбэк Нооо я тебе хочу рассказать, что Мони сейчас – это чит-код, чтобы платить на 90% меньше комсы торгуя на солане и эфире + получать социальные и ончейн данные по смартам бесплатно Как? 🌟 Чекни https://moni-ai.gitbook.io/moni. Там и доки, и демо видос, и все нужные ссылки на расширение и бота.

15🫡8

10 Jun 2026, 17:29 UTC≈2,670 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❤️ Торговля в эфире и я рассказываю тебе что, да как Записал первое подобное видео сюда. Решил наконец показывать, а не только писать. В moni.ai мы добавили возможность торговать в Ethereum сети. В расширении, в Твиттере, и в боте. Месяцами самым частым запросом в личке были EVM сети, так как Солана у нас была уже. Теперь Эфир тоже есть. Открываешь токенс, смотришь кто из Смартов подписан, купил этот токен или гово

👍8👀3

29 May 2026, 15:19 UTC≈5,760 views25 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Мы запускаем Moni Research 300+ статей, 1700+ ежедневных альфа-репортов, тысячи разборов проектов и экосистем. Также за эти годы мы работали с огромным количеством проектов(Nansen, Delphi, 1inch, BNB Chain, ApeChain, Legion, Sui, TON, MegaETH, Monad, Near, Berachain, Initia, Mantle, Heurist, Li.Fi, Sonic, Fantasy, Impossible Finance). Работа эта была всегда, мы просто не складывали её в одно место. Теперь сложили

👍166❤‍🔥2👀1

28 May 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,080 views10 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @moni_talksPhoto

Всем ГМ, небольшой анонс! Такое дело Слоник завёл свой канал Cozy Space 🐧 Если кто не в курсе, это член команды Moni, делает ретро контент для Talks и Gem Hunters. В основном это его подборки с быстрыми апдейтами (раз, два, три) и иногда разборы проектов. В Cozy Space будут всё те же подборки с интересными событиями по проектам, плюс рефлексивные постики. Как ты мог догадаться, в Talks их больше не будет 🫡 > @co

8👍2

22 May 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,610 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

заходим https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9TubeiBM3w @HONKAYO @mqxon2k @miguelrare и я вещаем сейчас тут Обсудим новости уходящей недели, поделимся мыслями и поофтопим

👍3👀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @garri_degen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,810 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ты деген, Гарри” (@garri_degen), 4,725 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/garri_degen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.