👀
❤49🔥27🤩23👍6😁2

Channel
@gainshood
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
286subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001383307867 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gainshood |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gainshood |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 286 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 287 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 287 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
668 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 206 | 30.8% | |
| ❤ | 192 | 28.7% | |
| 🤩 | 163 | 24.4% | |
| 👍 | 81 | 12.1% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 1.50% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 1.20% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 0.898% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.299% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 668reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2024 to 14 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👀
❤49🔥27🤩23👍6😁2
IT'S SHOWTIME 🎉🎉 $AIRTNT
🔥45🤩42❤17👍7
Pavel Durov mentioned the success of Notcoin in his latest post: "💎 The $6 million worth of Notcoin donated to me 2 weeks ago has increased in price 4 times and is now valued at $24 million." 🚀 Don't miss out on the next big opportunity! Explore Telegram Apps Center and discover Hamster Kombat, Blum, and other exciting apps. These could be the next Notcoin, offering you the chance to earn and thrive 💪
🤩43🔥25👍15❤10
it is just the beginning, literally
❤64🔥28🤩22👍12
Previously, when $NOT broke out of the trend, we saw a +500% rally (a 5x surge) History does repeat itself Using this clue, it'd be safe to expect $NOT to have a good run from here. It has broken the trend once again and might even outperform/underperform the previous one rally. What to do? Purchase on SPOT and hold Go LONG if your balls are forged with the dragon's breathe 🐉 🐲 We should be seeing a good run pr…
🔥23❤12🤩12👍6
Eyes on $AIRTNT $FLOKI Spot plays 👌
❤39🔥23🤩20👍17💯2
Really don't see any further downside for $BLOCK from this point. https://www.tradingview.com/x/nWXFFLgl $MAGA is up +25% today Currently trading 0.000255 https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/MAGAUSDT/?exchange=GATEIO&utm_source=androidapp&utm_medium=share
🔥3
$MAGA is getting set to fly Currently trading 0.00018912 Targets: 0.0005 - 0.0007 That's a 2x - 4x Feel free to buy now on gate.io https://www.tradingview.com/x/Tk9g5VFz
⚡3
https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/AIRTNTUSDT/?exchange=GATEIO&utm_source=androidapp&utm_medium=share 9days later Let it fly 🚀
🔥15🎉2
$GME famous Gamestop token is currently -50%+ down This is a good buy zone for next leg up Currently trading $0.01500 Targets : 0.02 - 0.03 and above Spot plays Purchase on Gate.io, mexc, coinex and poloniex https://www.tradingview.com/x/c2do3ctW
👍2🔥1
This play is still valid
Targets on $NOT completed $0.02 - 0.017 retractement regions has been smashed. Bag up for more leg up
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gainshood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GAINSHOOD” (@gainshood), 286 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gainshood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.