Channel
@futuregennews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,987subscribers
+670 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002222354413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @futuregennews |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/futuregennews |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 02:20 | 11,987 | +15 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 11,972 | +113 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 11,859 | +9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 11,850 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 11,851 | +22 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 11,829 | +20 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 11,809 | +26 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 11,783 | +31 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 11,752 | +28 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:13 | 11,724 | +11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:27 | 11,713 | +30 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 11,683 | +42 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 11,641 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 11,636 | +15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 11,621 | +37 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 11,584 | +21 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 11,563 | +39 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 11,524 | +49 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 11,475 | +17 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 11,458 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
463 reactions across 40 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 165 | 35.6% | |
| 👍 | 165 | 35.6% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 6.48% | |
| 🤯 | 20 | 4.32% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 4.10% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 3.89% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 3.02% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 1.51% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 1.51% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 1.08% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 0.864% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.648% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.432% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.432% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.216% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.216% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 463 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ChatGPT Ads reached a $1B annualized revenue run rate in under 200 days, after crossing $100M just 6 weeks into the pilot. OpenAI's also gave $2.4B ad-revenue forecast for 2026 under serious pressure, since earlier months were running far below today's pace. The longer-range expectations are even steeper: OpenAI reportedly projects nearly $11B in ad revenue for 2027 and $102B by 2030.
👍5😁3
DRAM prices are getting ridiculous. South Korean trade data shows DRAM export prices reached $92,183 per kilogram from August 1 to 20, up 401% year over year, about 12.5 times the January 2023 price. 1 kg of Korean DRAM was worth about as much as 620 grams of 24K gold at recent Korean prices.
👍9😁2😐1
BREAKING: Anthropic faces a major copyright lawsuit from Sony Music and Warner Music. They accuse Anthropic of illegally torrenting, scraping and downloading copyrighted music to train its Claude AI models. The publishers call it "one of the largest and most blatant ongoing thefts of intellectual property in history." The lawsuit comes shortly after Anthropic agreed to a $1.5 Billion settlement with book authors a…
👍9
Bill Gates says tech executives are privately “deeply concerned” about AI’s risks but publicly downplay them because too much money is at stake.
👏11👍2😁1
wtf Anthropic’s IPO pitch: more than $30 trillion in potential revenue, topping SpaceX and xAI’s $28.5 trillion estimate. Anthropic may tell investors that the work Claude and other AI models could eventually perform represents a market worth more than $30 trillion. The company could seek a valuation of roughly $2 trillion and raise up to $100 billion in its IPO. I'm curious to see if that's possible after the cur…
❤9👍4😁3
Patients are now being advised to consult artificial intelligence tools prior to medical appointments to gain a clearer understanding of their health issues and possible treatments. Medical professionals are also expected to integrate AI into their workflow, using it as an additional step to verify treatment plans. Following the introduction of advanced AI platforms like ChatGPT, both patient and clinician usage of …
❤6🆒4👍1
Nvidia demonstrates up to five times better cost efficiency compared to AMD at a rate of 150 tokens per second per user, according to the latest SemiAnalysis report. Data indicates that with current AMD software, Nvidia's performance lead is significant. Even if AMD hardware were provided at no cost, while still accounting for expenses such as datacenter hosting and power, Nvidia would continue to deliver a lower co…
👍7
China's 'Bilibili' reportedly paying creators $0.70 per 1k views — quickly rising to challenge RIVAL platform Youtube
🔥7👍1
Twitch and Amazon are facing a proposed class action over AI training data. Streamer Warren Pandiscia alleges the companies copied millions of videos without consent, as early as 2024, to train Amazon's generative AI. Filed Aug. 20 in the Northern District of California. Twitch confirmed the practice on Aug. 12 and added an opt-out setting. Channels are opted in by default. Chief product officer Mike Minton, defend…
👍7❤2
Nvidia is reportedly spending $6 billion to build one of the world’s most powerful open-weight AI models. According to the WSJ, Nvidia will license Poolside’s technology and bring more than 100 of its employees into the Nemotron project. Nvidia is also investing another $1 billion in Poolside at a $12 billion pre-money valuation. The goal: challenge Chinese open-weight leaders such as DeepSeek and Kimi while compe…
❤13🔥1
Meta is releasing 10 tasks from WildArtifactBench, an internal evaluation framework designed to measure the practical utility of multimodal agents. WildArtifactBench evaluates agents on complex, real-world tasks across different deliverable formats. Instead of relying only on strict ground-truth answers, Meta says the framework uses: • Win rates • Elo scores • Judgments from both human and agentic preference evalu…
❤6
AI-associated writing is spreading very unevenly across the web By 2026, 9.4% of .com webpages showed significant signs of AI editing or authorship, compared with 1% of .edu and 0.8% of .gov pages. - Pew Research May be because, commercial publishers can benefit directly when faster drafting lets them produce more pages, while public institutions often have slower publishing processes and weaker volume incentives.…
👏6👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @futuregennews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Artificial Intelligence” (@futuregennews), 11,987 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/futuregennews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.