Channel
@fullmetal_head
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002321863197 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fullmetal_head |
| Description | художественные тексты Сборник рассказов «Б.Н» разрешенная в РФ просветительская организация* |
| Created | 25 September 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fullmetal_head |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 33 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 33 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 September 2024 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
78 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 25 | 32.1% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 32.1% | |
| 🕊 | 20 | 25.6% | |
| ✍ | 8 | 10.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2024 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, добрый вечер! Делюсь с вами своим первым большим рассказом написанным в рамках курса по сторителлингу от Нины и Бориса Заранее благодарю вас за прочтение и любые комментарии! https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aJqn0WdPspFEZW_lmXeK29SudRnlzd1bflkwBT_25pw/edit?usp=sharing
🍓2✍1
Всем привет! Хочу опубликовать свой текст с открытого микрофона у Creative Writing Смерть Петра Первого Все знают легенду о том, как Пётр Первый, отец Петербурга – заполучил пневмонию спасая крестьянина из болота, но мало кто вспоминает о том, кем был тот крестьянин. Того маленького человека, ради которого Царь пожертвовал своей жизнью звали Никонор. Никонор, в общем-то был обычный мужик, но был у него талант сто…
🕊5🍓3✍1👍1
Друзья, доброе утро! Вот мой рассказ Буду рад если поделитесь своим впечатлением. Заголовок получился таким же провокационным как и название)
🍓4🕊3✍2👍2
Минула очередная неделя, и мы успели получить за это время три очередных рассказа на наш литературный конкурс Время Перелома 4 (2026). Хотя пока ещё рано говорить о каких-либо устойчивых тенденциях, невооружённым глазом заметно, что проблемы и ограничения, связанные с интернетом, действительно волнуют людей: эта тема встречается едва ли не в каждом втором рассказе. С точки зрения конкурса это нечто новое. Первый се…
Всем привет друзья! Хочу поделиться зарисовкой одной из своих любимых концертных записей. На мой взгляд очень захватывающее выступление и не менее захватывающая композиция. Машинист Майкл Найман садится за клавишные и дергает рычаг паровоза. Духовые срываются густым облаком баритона, здесь же басист подбрасывает угля в печь и экипаж начинает набирать скорость. Скрипки стучат по рельсам, за ними включается стук ко…
✍1🍓1👍1
Мы уже перевалили за середину тёмных двадцатых. Войны, кризисы и напряжение расползаются всё шире — и постепенно становятся частью повседневности. То, что ещё недавно шокировало, теперь воспринимается как фон. Как ни цинично это звучит, но для писателя это время — непаханое поле. За три сезона конкурса «Время перелома» мы получили более ста рассказов — и среди них немало сильной прозы, по которой однажды будут суди…
👍1
Новый конкурс – новый рассказ! Друзья может кто-то из вас тоже захочет поучаствовать!
👍1
Друзья, всем добрый вечер! Спешу поделиться своей короткой зарисовкой, которую я придумал на занятиях Нины и Бориса об альтернативной истории. Изначальный текст был буквально одним абзацем, но идея показалась настолько интересной, что я развил её до короткого рассказа. На мой взгляд получилось забавно и абсурдно, буду рад любым откликам.
🍓3👍3
Опа, привет! Пока пишу второй рассказ о музыканте. Делюсь коротенькой зарисовкой с курсов Нины и Бориса чтоб совсем не пустовал мой скромный канал. «Римляне с Волжского переулка» Жили в моем переулке римляне Пеловани и Флорентини. Пеловани не долюбливал Флорентини, потому-что у Флорентини по его мнению были очень большие мыши, не просто мыши, а натуральные мышцы. Мышцы как громадного силача Савушкина, что жил в со…
🕊6
Мы продолжаем получать работы для участия в литературном конкурсе Время Перелома 3, и уже побили рекорд конкурсов прошлых двух сезонов собрав 39 работ! Полный каталог полученных рассказов посмотреть можно тут. За последнюю неделю к нашему списку добавилось аж 12 новых работ. Нам пишут и любители-новички, и молодые, но уже признаные писатели. Большинство работ сильные, искренние, хотя, если честно, не могу не заметит…
👍3
Также дублирую рассказ в телеграфе 1 часть: https://telegra.ph/Feodosiya-Dezhavyu-1-chast-09-22 2 часть: https://telegra.ph/Feodosiya-Dezhavyu-2-chast-09-22
👍3🍓1
В этот осенний день спешу поделиться своим новым рассказом. Это короткая зарисовка, в придуманном мной жанре «Крымский нуар». Буду очень рад вашей обратной связи в любой форме. Для меня этот рассказ – личная победа, поскольку кажется, впервые у меня получилось написать что-то действительно законченное композиционно.
🕊4✍1🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fullmetal_head. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,259,982 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@fullmetal_head named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Свинцовая Голова” (@fullmetal_head), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fullmetal_head.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.