Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فتاوى حديثية (عبدالرحمن النوفل)

Channel

فتاوى حديثية (عبدالرحمن النوفل)

@ftawahdetheh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

238subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003424761072
TypeChannel
Username@ftawahdetheh
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ftawahdetheh

Growth

225238231.56 August 2026 — 225 subscribers7 August 2026 — 225 subscribers14 August 2026 — 238 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 223–240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:56238+13
7 Aug 2026, 03:02225no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:23225first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC84 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdethVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC77 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdethVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC71 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdethVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC78 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdethVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC70 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdethVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdethVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC122 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdethVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC126 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdethVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC126 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdethVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC92 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdeth

أحسن الله إليكم نقل الترمذي في العلل الكبير عن البخاري أنه قال: لا أعرف لأبي إسحاق سماعًا من سعيد بن جبير مع أن حديث أبي إسحاق عن سعيد بن جبير في صحيح البخاري فما وجه الجمع؟ وما رأيكم في كتاب علل الترمذي الكبير وكيفية الاستفادة منه؟

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC80 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdeth

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته احسن الله اليكم سمعت ان كبار الفقهاء ك مالك احمد مثلا قد يستدلون ب مسألة فقهية على عمل صحابي ف يأتي المتأخرون من ويستدلون على هذه المسألة ب حديث ضعيف ومعلل ويجعلونه المعول عليه في هذا لو كانت هذه القاعده صحيحه ومطرده في بعض الفروع الفقهية فهل اذا استدل بحديث معلل وضعيف هل يسكت عن تعليله ويقال عليه عمل الفقهاء ؟

26 Jun 2026, 02:33 UTC72 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @allalhdeth

السؤال الثاني احسن الله اليكم هل حديث ابي واباك في النار حديث في اضطراب وما وجه الاضراب فيه

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ftawahdetheh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فتاوى حديثية (عبدالرحمن النوفل)” (@ftawahdetheh), 238 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ftawahdetheh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.