رحم الله من سمع خيرا فنشره للمسلمين

Channel
قناة عبد الرحمن النوفل
@allalhdeth
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,367subscribers
+320 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001381942832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @allalhdeth |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/allalhdeth |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 03:20 | 4,367 | +182 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:45 | 4,185 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:47 | 4,187 | +11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:56 | 4,176 | +1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 4,175 | +11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:30 | 4,164 | +3 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:19 | 4,161 | +2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 4,159 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:36 | 4,160 | -4 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 4,164 | +1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 22:41 | 4,163 | +13 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 18:36 | 4,150 | +3 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 4,147 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 4,152 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 4,150 | +11 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 4,139 | +10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:13 | 4,129 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 4,128 | +3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 4,125 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 4,122 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 47s
- Average length
- 47s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
اسم الله الأعظم
رسالتي لعاشق
Voice message, posted without a caption
✉️ : شيخ أليس مذهب المحدثين هو وضع اليدين على الصدر ----
قال ابن ماجة (3619) قال: حدثنا علي بن محمد، قال: حدثنا وكيع، عن سفيان، عن عبد الله بن دينار عن عبد الله بن عمر، قال: «نهى النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أن ينتعل الرجل قائما هذا حديث منكر لا يعرف
خرج أبو عوانة في مستخرجه من رواية محمد بن أَبي بكر المُقَدَّمي، قال: حدثنا حماد بن زيد، عن أيوب عن أبي الزبير، عن جابر؛ «أن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم لما رجم ماعز بن مالك، قال: لقد رأيته يتخضخض في أنهار الجنة». على شرط مسلم وهو حديث منكر بمرة
Voice message, posted without a caption
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته شيخنا الله يحسن إليك ويبارك فيكم عندي سؤال وهو عن الإمام بقي بن مخلد وهو أنه رحمه الله كانت لديه مصنفات وهذه المصنفات لها ألقاب عظيمة كمصنفه في آثار الصحابة ومسنده وتفسيره فكل هذه الكتب التي فقدت له في ترجمته يقال إنه الأوسع والأفضل في بابها. محل الإشكال شيخنا أن ولا نقل نُقل لنا من هذه الكتب ولا إمام يعني لا الطبري نقل ولا ابن المنذر ولا ابن عبد البر ولا ابن حزم (حسب علمي القاصر) مع …
قاعدة في التعامل مع حديث المدلس
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته ما صحة الحديث الذي رواه أبو داود وغيره أَتَى رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَعْرَابِيٌّ فَقَالَ : يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ، جُهِدَتِ الْأَنْفُسُ، وَضَاعَتِ الْعِيَالُ، وَنُهِكَتِ الْأَمْوَالُ، وَهَلَكَتِ الْأَنْعَامُ، فَاسْتَسْقِ اللَّهَ لَنَا إلى أن قال وإنه ليئط به أطيط الرحل بالراكب وكما هو هو معلوم هو من رواية محمد بن إسحاق وهو مدلس وقد عنعن ولكن الن خزيمة رواه في ا…
Voice message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @allalhdeth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @allalhdeth as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 8.1 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Ruqyah011 · 24,280
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 September 2026
@tahelhadethe · 20,418
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 September 2026
@aladwey · 53,079
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
@shffaaaaa · 25,036
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 September 2026
@hussn33 · 49,398
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 October 2026
@moltqaahlalhadith · 25,736
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
@Ghasham22 · 132,950
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 August 2026
@k_therebel · 40,263
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
@qassimjobs24 · 62,334
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
@hayaalsabah · 21,629
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 September 2026
@mkalosyme · 38,310
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 September 2026
@Abd3llhhh · 30,718
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
@dardashaat · 21,172
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة عبد الرحمن النوفل” (@allalhdeth), 4,367 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allalhdeth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.