Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Третий фронт

@front_media

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

744subscribers

-35 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002517224114
TypeChannel
Username@front_media
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/front_media

Growth

744779761.55 August 2026 — 779 subscribers6 August 2026 — 775 subscribers6 August 2026 — 775 subscribers12 August 2026 — 744 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 739–784 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:55744-31
6 Aug 2026, 15:38775no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:00775-4
5 Aug 2026, 23:26779first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.3%
avg views ÷ 744 subscribers
Avg views / post
188
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held10 (15 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,883
Reactions total72
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2331.9%
1723.6%
👍1723.6%
🫡811.1%
🤝45.56%
💯22.78%
👀11.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC25 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @NeoficialniyBeZsonoV

Как распознать, что против твоей страны ведётся информационная война? Распознать ведение информационной войны против государства можно по резкому изменению медиасреды, как во внутреннем информационном поле страны, так и на международном. Во внутреннем информационном поле это проявляется на таких информационных ресурсах, как сообщества социальных сетей, мессенджеры, независимые СМИ, независимые блогеры. К примеру, в

👍2💯21🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC77 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#военкоры Почерк Победы. Илья Френкель. Илья Френкель родился в 1903 году в Кургане, но родители очень скоро перебрались в столицу. Здесь после 1917 года уже юношей он включился в комсомольскую работу, а параллельно начал писать стихи. Особой страстью стали песни. Его первый сборник в 1935 году находит отклик у матерых литераторов, талант замечают и Багрицкий, и Пастернак. Френкель проходит военкором финскую камп

2🔥2🫡2

29 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC25 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @eisragendaPhoto

Механика инфовойны: опыт противостояния России и Запада Сегодня информационное противостояние между Россией и Западом достигло небывалых масштабов. Несмотря на то, что цели оппонентов не меняются — деморализовать и расколоть наше общество — противники ищут все новые формы для атак, от медийных и мошеннических до откровенно террористических. Это и многое другое – 30 июля в 11:00 в пресс-центре медиагруппы «Россия се

👍2🤝2

28 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC37 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Белые» и «Красные» внутри нас: почему раскол — это оружие, которое убивает будущее Одна из самых болезненных точек нашей истории — разрыв между Россией Царской и Россией Советской. Мы часто спорим о том, что было бы, «если бы не революция». Но реже говорим о том, как этот исторический разлом превратили в инструмент манипуляции. Нас заставляют выбирать: либо ты за «порфироносных страстотерпцев», золотые купола и дв

4🔥4🫡4

27 Jul 2026, 06:27 UTC41 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sidpolit

Гибридные войны и протестный потенциал В дискуссии про информационную безопасность все предельно очевидно. Есть фактор протестного потенциала. В каждом государстве найдутся недовольные и несогласные граждане. Степень разочарования в отношении действий правительства может выражаться по-разному, от протестного голосования за любого другого кандидата до митингов, забастовок и массовых акций гражданского неповиновения.

🔥43👍3

26 Jul 2026, 13:17 UTC≈1,370 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В День Военно-морского флота хотим напомнить вам о нашем специальном тесте, с помощью которого можно проверить свои знания истории и современного состояния ВМФ России. 🙂Полный вперёд! https://mnmquiz.mmflow.ru Подписаться на Третий фронт

2🔥2🫡2

22 Jul 2026, 14:06 UTC57 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @mnm_masterskayaPhoto

Тыла нет, фронт везде Встреча с полпредом Президента РФ в УрФО и Героем ДНР Артемом Жогой на МНМ. Делимся главным: ▫️ Каждый может внести вклад в Победу Один мой товарищ всегда говорил, еще до начала СВО: тыла нет, фронт везде. Потому что каждый человек, который любит свою родину, который трудится и работает, учится на этой территории, который родился в России, изначально считает ее своей родиной, он всеми своими д

🔥53👍3

17 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC60 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Третий фронт рекомендует. Что посмотреть? «Ополченский романс» Военная драма по бестселлеру Захара Прилепина о том, как война меняет тех, кто оказался в ее эпицентре по зову сердца. Картина хорошо показывает, что за глобальными событиями всегда стоят конкретные люди со страхами, иронией и внутренней силой. Для медиаспециалистов сериал может стать уроком нарративной этики: как рассказать о трагедии, не превращая ее

👍3🔥3

16 Jul 2026, 06:10 UTC100 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#военкоры Почерк Победы. Михаил Шолохов. Уроженец казачьего края уже в 10 лет он начал записывать рассказы, а первой публикацией в 1923 году стал газетный фельетон «Испытание». Но не пройдет и 5 лет, как свет увидит первый том «Тихого Дона», эпопею он будет писать до 1940 года. В годы Войны — он военкор «Красной Звезды» и «Правды», которой уже посвятил 10 лет, и где впервые появятся главы «Они сражались за Родину

2👍2🔥2

15 Jul 2026, 06:10 UTC91 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Продолжаем рассматривать нарративы, которые использует против нас ЦИПСО Сегодня рассмотрим разгоняемое искажение «Россия — отсталая цивилизация» Когнитивная война против нас: объясняет проект Русский ковчег Источник. Подписаться на Третий фронт

👍2🤝2👀1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @front_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 148,696 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Третий фронт” (@front_media), 744 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/front_media.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.