Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Френч-пресс

@frenchpress

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

152subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001144448323
TypeChannel
Username@frenchpress
DescriptionКанал Антона @zGrav Григорьева о жизни и проектировании интерфейсов. Est. 2017
Created12 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/frenchpress

Growth

1526 August 2026 — 152 subscribers8 August 2026 — 152 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151–153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:30152no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:32152first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.1%
avg views ÷ 152 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.0
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (19 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total366
Reactions total34
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
124
Videos
3
Links
247

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 41s
Average length
2m 41s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

78 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3342.3%
🔥1316.7%
👍1215.4%
😁1215.4%
🤣33.85%
22.56%
❤‍🔥11.28%
😱11.28%
🤝11.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:23 UTC42 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В серьёзный пост о работе в айти не вошла интересная мысль (кстати, 23к+ просмотров в Тредсе). В тезисах, которые я выписал из книги «Не сойти с айти», была цитата: Рынок стал плотнее: все могут создавать. Теперь важнее не то, умеешь ли ты, а то, делаешь ли. Я не смог сжать её до нескольких слов в гиперперечне преимуществ пет-проектов. Она, наоборот, требует расшифровки. Есть такой популярный вопрос: Чем бы вы за

🔥5👍2😁1

4 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC44 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @UshakovITPhoto

С момента выхода «Не сойти с айти» прошла неделя и хочется поделиться первыми разультатами и размышлениями Прежде всего я получил такой отзыв на «Литрес», который вызвал во мне радость: читатель получил именно тот эффект, который я ожидал. Про «успешность» книги пока рано еще делать выводы, но могу сказать, что пока массового интереса к книге не возникло. Перед стартом продаж оптимизма было больше: книгу соглашалис

2👍2

2 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC81 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Теперь о серьёзном — работе в айти. Вакансий мало. Самоизоляция, низкие процентные ставки и неприкладные проекты вроде метаверса и NFT временно разогрели рынок. Потом пошли сокращения. Рынок работодателя на Западе — с 2024 года, в России — с лета 2025 (дольше протянули за счёт эмиграции и замещения ушедших западных продуктов). И больше не станет. Рынок зрелый, для всех реальных проблем есть айти-решения. Нет прорыв

8🔥3👍1

31 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC68 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Недавно опубликовал две шутки, и каждая получила больше сотни лайков — уже повод выложить их сюда, такое у меня в Тредсе впервые. Но что интересно: просмотров с таким количеством лайков они получили всего 2к и 7к. При том что посты с 40к+ просмотров, которыми я уже хвастался здесь, лайков получили намного меньше. Даже у этих двух шуток просмотров больше там, где меньше лайков. Не понимаю логики. Шутку про рисунок И

😁2

23 Jul 2026, 16:24 UTC78 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @uirefsPhoto

2017 год, Волгоград. Я мечтаю выбраться из съемных квартир и о финансовой стабильности. Хочется много зарабатывать, стать классным Я находил в вк паблики про дизайн и писал админам что-то типа «привет, я дизайнер, дайте работу». Еще писал всем контактам, что у меня были, с диалогом: — привет, тебе что-то нужно задизайнить? — привет, нет — может, ты знаешь кого-то, кому могут понадобиться мои услуги? — … И тогда я ч

5👍2🤝1

4 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC90 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Когда писал предыдущий пост — а именно слова о том, что быстро печатаю, — захотел посмотреть на свои замеры скорости. Замеры я делал давным-давно на сайте vse10.ru, который потом переехал на домен ratatype.com. (Скорость печати — один из навыков, стремительно теряющих ценность в 2k26.) Сертификат со скоростью печати на английском нашёл, на русском — не могу найти. На сайте есть курсы-тренажёры по повышению скорости

😱1

3 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC78 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У нашей семьи есть артефакт — тетрадка с рукописными дедушкиными мемуарами. В последнее время я их оцифровывал. Мама сфотографировала все страницы на телефон и прислала мне. Я открывал на одном экране фото и окно браузера с Гугл Документами и перепечатывал текст. Так как я печатаю довольно быстро и вслепую, текст появлялся со скоростью спокойного чтения. Естественно, сначала я попросил ЧатГПТ распознать текст перво

21❤‍🔥1👍1😁1

25 Jun 2026, 10:35 UTC83 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Круто: в приложении Тинькофф-банка проработали кейс, когда на карте не хватает денег для оплаты. Просто нажимаешь на кнопку и в модальном окне переводишь недостающую сумму с накопительного счёта. Вопрос, конечно, почему нельзя сразу заплатить с накопительного счёта в этом сценарии, то есть выбрать его источником оплаты?

1

13 Jun 2026, 14:25 UTC90 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вчера концерт Канье Веста собрал 70 тысяч человек на стадионе в Тбилиси. Мобильный интернет перестал справляться, и кружочки не загрузились. И на домашнем интернете потом — тоже не загрузились. Поэтому из видеоконтента предлагаю посмотреть запись адиного выступления с «World of Dance, Georgia». И чтобы два раза не вставать: ветка с текстом о фамилиях с окончанием «off» залетела на 44к+ просмотров.

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @frenchpress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 449,404 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Френч-пресс” (@frenchpress), 152 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frenchpress.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.