Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pílulas Jurídicas | STF e STJ

Channel

Pílulas Jurídicas | STF e STJ

@pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,720subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001232030501
TypeChannel
Username@pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ

Growth

7,7207,7517,735.57 August 2026 — 7,740 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,740 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,742 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,743 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,751 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,745 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,739 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,730 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,732 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,730 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,724 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,720 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,715–7,756 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 19:407,720-4
2 Sept 2026, 11:477,724-6
30 Aug 2026, 22:147,730-2
27 Aug 2026, 13:087,732+2
24 Aug 2026, 09:087,730-9
21 Aug 2026, 00:187,739-6
17 Aug 2026, 19:557,745-6
14 Aug 2026, 13:357,751+8
11 Aug 2026, 05:477,743+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:357,742+2
7 Aug 2026, 23:007,740no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:597,740first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.92%
avg views ÷ 7,720 subscribers
Avg views / post
534
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.811%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held35 (15 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total8,017
Reactions total65
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 35 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7445.4%
6338.7%
👏2213.5%
🔥31.84%
👎10.613%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Link de acesso ao Canal: https://t.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ

👍1

27 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC240 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Link de acesso ao Canal: https://t.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ

👏2

26 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC338 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Link de acesso ao Canal: https://t.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ

👍3👏1

25 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC409 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Link de acesso ao Canal: https://t.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ

👍5👏1

24 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC459 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Link de acesso ao Canal: https://t.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ

👍5👏1

21 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC618 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Gostaria de agradecer ao professor e amigo Rodrigo Becker pelo presente e pela gentil dedicatória. O livro das fotos acima é um verdadeiro tratado sobre a execução e me é útil desde a sua 1ª edição. Recomendo a todos! Ah, e fico muito feliz e honrado que, ainda que minimamente, meu trabalho aqui no “Pílulas Jurídicas” ajude na atualização de um dos melhores livros sobre execução do país. Valeu, xará. Saudações do RN

6👏3👍1

21 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC583 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Link de acesso ao Canal: https://t.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ

👏3👍1

21 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC532 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Tese repetitiva Canal Pílulas Jurídicas | STF e STJ Link de acesso ao Canal: https://t.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ 🔎 Em discussão: definir se é possível prosseguir a execução fiscal contra o espólio ou os sucessores caso o executado venha a falecer sem ser citado ✔️ Tese fixada: o redirecionamento da execução fiscal contra o espólio ou os sucessores só é admitido quando o falecimento do contribuinte ocorrer depois

2

19 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC532 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Link de acesso ao Canal: https://t.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ

👍3

17 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC673 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Tese repetitiva Canal no Whatsapp | Pílulas Jurídicas | STF e STJ Link de acesso ao Canal: https://t.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ 🔎 Questão submetida a julgamento: 1) Definir se, nas relações jurídicas de trato sucessivo em que a Fazenda Pública figure como devedora, a prescrição do fundo de direito depende da negativa expressa do direito reclamado. 2) Definir se a inércia do Município de Estreito em implantar adici

3👍1

14 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC739 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Link de acesso ao Canal: https://t.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ

👏51👍1

13 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC744 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Tese repetitiva Canal Pílulas Jurídicas | STF e STJ Link de acesso ao Canal: https://t.me/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ 🔎 Questão submetida a julgamento: definir se é possível a penhora de pecúlio do condenado para pagamento de pena de multa, diante da alegação de impenhorabilidade das verbas de natureza alimentar. 📍Tese jurídica fixada: é possível a penhora de até 1/4 do pecúlio do condenado para o pagamento da pena de

1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pílulas Jurídicas | STF e STJ” (@pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ), 7,720 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pilulasjuridicasSTFSTJ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.