Channel
@fozil_blog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
245subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001565706527 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fozil_blog |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fozil_blog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 245 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 243 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 241 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
260 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 83 | 31.9% | |
| 🔥 | 78 | 30.0% | |
| ❤ | 65 | 25.0% | |
| 💯 | 33 | 12.7% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.385% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2025 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fozil_blog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 May 2025 to 11 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Natija qiymati Doim o‘zimcha nimanidir kutib yashayman. Balki hammada shunaqadir. Bir paytlar yuqori ball olishni, universitetga kirishni, o‘zim pul topishni kutardim. Vaqt o‘tgan sari esa o‘lchovlarimiz o'zgardi, ko‘zlagan natijalarimiz esa ko‘proq vaqt talab qila boshladi. Shunda tushunyapman - katta natijalar vaqt talab qiladi. Birinchi million - vaqt talab qiladi. Foydali inson bo‘lish - vaqt talab qiladi. Ja…
👍12
Muhtojmiz Uzoq vaqt ko'rishmagan yaqinlarimiz bilan uchrashishdan oldin biz o'zgarganimizni (ayniqsa shu vaqt mobaynida o'z ustimizda qattiq ishlagan bo'lsak) e'tirof etishlarini va "O'zgaribsan" deb maqtashlarini qisman bo'lsa ham kutamiz. Maqtaganlaridan keyin boshdan o'tkazgan qiyinchiliklarimiz, intizomimiz va qurbonliklarimiz behuda ketmaganiga ishonch hosil qilamiz. Biz bunday maqtovga muhtojmiz. Lekin ular …
👍13
Qancha emas, qanday muhim Oxirgi kunlarda ko'plab job interview'lar qilyapman. Talabgorlarning bilimlarini tekshirishdan tashqari, jarayonning o'zidan ham har xil xulosalar olyapman. Shu xulosalardan biri - sizda qancha tajriba borligi emas, qanday tajriba borligi muhim. Ko'plab "senior" yoki 7+ yillik tajribaga ega nomzodlarni ham rad etdik. Sababi oddiy - ularning shuncha tajribalari sifatsiz tajriba edi. Hayotd…
👍10
Noto'g'ri xulosa Hodisalardan olingan noto'g'ri xulosalarimiz ko'pincha shu ikki tushunchani farqlay olmaganimizdan kelib chiqadi deb o'ylayman: bog'liqlik va sabab. Bir hodisa boshqasi bilan yonma-yon sodir bo'ldi degani, biri ikkinchisiga sabab bo'ldi degani emas. Qaysidir tojik odam sizni "uxlatib" ketdi degani - millati tojik bo'lgan har qanday odam sizni "uxlatib" ketadi degani emas. (millatchi deb o'ylamang,…
👍4
O’tmishdan xat kelibdi: Shu maktubni o’qiyotgan ekansan, san moliyaviy, fikriy, jismoniy va ruhiy erkinlikka chiqib bo’lgan bo’lishing kerak. Mas’uliyatli, ulg’aygan, o’zining mustaqil fikrlariga ega, o’z hissiyotini boshqara oladigan yetakchi o’laroq o’qiyotgan bo’lishing kerak. Bu maktub o’tmishdan, 2025-yil boshida yozilgan. Maqsadim shunchaki sanga dalda berish, kayfiyatingni ko’tarishdir. Bu maktubni o’qirkans…
🔥7❤2👍2
10 Lessons in 2025 1. Losing yourself just to fit into a certain group is the lowest level of self-esteem. 2. The game isn't boring. You just don't know how to play it. 3. Blaming others for your own mistakes is the best way to ruin your own life. 4. Questioning every opinion before deciding to accept or reject it is a sign of maturity. 5. “It might not be okay to work your life away. But it is okay to work your…
🔥8❤3👍3
Yangi odat shakllantirishda qiynalamiz deymiz. Erta uyg'onish, uzoq muddat diqqat bilan ishlash, zalga chiqish va hokazo. O'zini majburlash kerak, kuchli iroda kerak, consistent bo'lish kerak - kabi tavsiyalar ham foyda bermaydi. Bunga sabab odatda bu ishlarni qilishimizdan to'sayotgan yomon odatlarimiz bo'ladi. Kech uxlash, ko'p shorts/reels ko'rish, vaqtni noto'g'ri taqsimlash, va hokazo. Shu blocker'larni aniqla…
👍7🔥3💯1
They say people love women, children, and pets unconditionally. I disagree. Unconditional love doesn’t exist in this world. The rule of this world is simple: there’s always a reason behind every action. Take laughter, for example. You laugh because something triggers it - maybe a memory, a funny story, or an experience that connects to that moment. It’s never random. The same applies to love. You love women - why? …
💯15❤6🔥5👍2
Startup company'larda eng qiyin ishlardan bittasi - bu userlarni jalb qilish. Undan ham muhimrog‘i - userlarni o‘z productini active ishlatadigan qilish. Buni qilish qiyin, sababi yangi productni ishlatishni odat qilish uchun user comfort zonasidan chiqishi kerak. U yangi narsalarni sinab ko‘rishi kerak. Bu yangi product uning ishini oson qiladimi yoki yo‘qmi - bu ular uchun ikkinchi masala. Biz build qilayotgan Nu…
🔥6👍2
There are some practices at Numeo that I've fallen in love with 1. Postmortem and 5 Why's Whenever an incident happens, instead of blaming a certain person, we ask 5 why's to identify the root cause of the issue and solve that so that it won't happen again in the future. Example: “Why did this happen?” – Because X went wrong. “Why did X go wrong?” – Because... 2. Boy scout rule If you see somewhere became too me…
❤5💯4👍3👎1
With power comes responsibility We often think life is easy if you're wealthy. That's true if we see from the outside. But each wealthy person is responsible for their employees, their decisions and actions. They may seem chill guys, but believe me, they're always anxious. They just don't show that to others because they already got used to being anxious all the time. And they're anxious not from the fear of losing …
❤3💯3👍2
Spent most of my time reviewing resume and interviewing applicants in the past 5 days, and here are my short takeaways: 1. Make sure your resume is neat We get hundreds of applications and you think we care about irrelevant details in your resume like your photo, full address, what languages you know? We don't. Just make sure your resume is neat and it shows your experience and skills in an understandable way. 2. D…
❤5👍5🔥4💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fozil_blog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,171,266 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fozil Mamadaliev” (@fozil_blog), 245 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fozil_blog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.