Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

小破不入渠🌏

@forwardlikehell

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,849subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001071312079
TypeChannel
Username@forwardlikehell
Description無理の囈語。 原创天国: twitter.com/Jesoooor 垃圾堆: t.me/eessej 欢迎访问「大破进击」博客: jesor.me 欢迎收听「交差点」播客: jiaocha.io A small piece of Jesse Chan, created by Jesse Chan. @Jesoooor
Created28 July 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/forwardlikehell

Growth

6,8496,8626,855.55 August 2026 — 6,862 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,862 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,857 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,849 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,847–6,864 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:326,849-8
8 Aug 2026, 22:246,857-5
6 Aug 2026, 03:176,862no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:436,862first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
154
Videos
12
Links
1,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

12 May 2026, 15:22 UTC≈4,910 viewsread 12 August 2026

较少有人意识到,「法西斯主义」的字面词源是 fascio,「捆束」,含义是通过团结并要求服从,大规模动员形成合力(暴力)。就是说,暂时脱离二战语境,对法西斯比较客观的意译其实应该是「团结/集体主义」。任何极端的政治实践,无论左右,都具有法西斯特质。 所以法西斯的反义词并不是民主,恰恰相反,法西斯的萌芽需要民主/民粹的土壤,墨索里尼和希特勒最初都是靠某种民主机制得到的权力;也不是进步,法西斯常描绘一个宏大的集体目标,常常是寻求变革的。法西斯的反义词是个体自由,是「人人生而平等,自主决定以不同方式追求幸福」。 从这个角度,就更容易理解近年全球范围内的法西斯抬头。包括西方的右翼回潮,也包括国内的毛左兴起,甚至有年轻人崇拜希特勒。 因为自由不只是一种权利,也意味着一个人有责任通过自我构建来实现价值。在一个资本主义秩序事实上钳制着年轻人发展的社会结构里,年轻人越是被赋予表面的自由,那种自我构建的困境和不协调就愈发凸显,进而导致他们越

1 May 2026, 15:44 UTC≈4,570 viewsread 12 August 2026

Johnny Harris 讲法西斯这集,算是近几年他做过最好的视频。 因为他并没有具体指责任何政治实体、政治家已走向法西斯道路(当然,作为美国人他肯定有在讲 Trump,但这远不是视频内容的全部),尤其没有在说中国。 但与此同时,这一切对法西斯主义的阐述,又与我们每个人的社会体感产生着共振,我们很难不自问:崇尚武力、反对自由、被神话的历史、外部敌人导致的屈辱、对复兴的承诺、魅力领袖和个人崇拜、得到精英支持、从内部瓦解民主、要求国家服从、大规模动员、对外扩张……这一切法西斯主义的特征,是在说谁啊? 不过看完这集,我对法西斯主义的一个新理解是:这是一种高度依赖暴力作为养分的机制,它缺乏建构性,本质是一种强盗主义。法西斯依赖的暴力,一方面汲取利益,无论是对内的清洗还是对外的战争;另一方面也制造紧张和恐惧,通过压迫一部分异己,使其他人获得心理上的相对满足。 这意味着消解法西斯的最好方法,可能就是一个后现代的、萎缩的、无法被动员

14 Apr 2026, 16:28 UTC≈4,260 viewsread 12 August 2026

YouTube 深夜神秘推荐。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PuLYRDrgjg

13 Apr 2026, 06:56 UTC≈4,800 viewsread 12 August 2026

最近知乎上关于「预期寿命」的讨论非常热烈,已接近形成一种思潮。 简单来说,就是有一群人,几乎都是男性,认为自己的实际寿命预期比官方统计数字要低得多,早逝的风险比想象中大得多。他们认为预期寿命的计算方法存在扭曲和失真,甚至有不少人质疑原始数据的真实性。 我觉得当下的预期寿命计算方法,可能确实存在「伴随现代社会产生的新的负面健康因素,比如肥胖、污染、过劳……还未充分暴露在 life table 里」的情况。但参考发达国家的经验,我不觉得这些因素会在近未来显著压低预期寿命。 包括统计学专业视角的反驳,chenqin 老师已经做过了,大家具备统计学知识基础的话,可以去读一读。 但我还是觉得这种思潮本身很有意思,即人们产生了一种关于生命本身的存在危机,且我感觉这些人并不是老人,而主要是中青年。他们对现代性带来的副作用如此不满,不再相信现代性(技术)能造福生命。 我印象很深,大约 2012 年前后,刘慈欣和韩松一起上过一个什么节目

16 Mar 2026, 02:37 UTC≈4,510 viewsread 12 August 2026

看宣传口对马前卒穷追猛打,一个感慨是:在我们从小的刻板印象里,宣传口(尤其包括官媒)是推进改革的中坚,是自由派进步力量的代表,民营企业则是改开后经济自由化的果实。宣传口和民营部门的进一步改革诉求,往往是被更高的,来自意识形态口的保守力量所限制的。 到今天,从宣传口、(民营)互联网平台企业到具体的民企,已经通过「封号」这一技术流程,创造了一道言论的铁幕。言论罪从最初的「恨国有罪」,拓展到几乎任何「批评」都有罪的程度。无需经过任何行政司法程序,只要判断一个人有「劣迹」,就可以剥夺其在互联网上的言论自由。 反而是(大概率)得到了某种意识形态口支持的马前卒,成为当下极少数拥有批评权利的媒体,可以直指社会问题,不会被(轻易)封号,代表着某种进步力量。即便他红且左,违背自由派的一切直觉。 就是说,随着「自由派」从中国政治生态里消失,剩下的人分裂为了高举民族主义当鸵鸟的「保守左」和寻求指出问题的「进步左」。 https://www.z

2 Mar 2026, 14:21 UTC≈4,870 viewsread 12 August 2026

看了 Casey Neistat 拍的 2026 NY 暴风雪的 vlog,很有味道。 这件事已经被阐述到了一种 cliche 的程度,即:我们往往在恶劣天气里感受到一种浪漫及兴奋。我自己对这一感受的阐述是:那是一个让你认识到生命是一种动态的时刻,即便只是一点点,但我们就是活在了那些瞬间里。 我们活在十号风球到来之前乌云低压,狂风大作的瞬间; 我们活在世界末日前一天深夜,拨出的最后一通电话被接通的瞬间; 我们活在被一把枪指着,即便没有子弹,但也有那么一瞬间陷入恍然的瞬间; 我们活在倾盆暴雨淹没了整个小区,停电后在一片漆黑中呼唤对方的瞬间; 我们活在出海、登山,体力被推向极限,脸上的汗化成盐粒,流落荒山野外,迷失方向和位置的瞬间; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUtgcOxRrqY

18 Feb 2026, 07:05 UTC≈7,550 viewsread 12 August 2026

早上看到三个人,exactly 3,说听这一集觉得任宁「太直男」。(首先我觉得在大年初二能看到三个人听完「迟早过年」并发表感想,这本身就有点 cringy…… 我对此没有任何意见要发表,只想到一个长期以来事实是:任宁老师是我和身边诸多朋友所(默默)公认的,最接近完美的「丈夫」和「父亲」的人,没有之一。也是我们作为男性的 role model,即便他过着一种世俗意义上我们难以企及的生活。 就是说,如果这个世界上有一个人的生育体验和经验是我感兴趣的,可能就是任宁。 但说实话,听完后有点失望。我们作为现代人,一个很新,但很深刻的哲学认识是「生命的阈限性」,当一切被稀释进宇宙理论,你很难再相信所谓的「靠传递基因突破生命的阈限」。面对这一虚无的深渊,即便是任宁和枪枪,所掀起的涟漪也依然不痛不痒。 我甚至有一种非贬义的感受:那些一生都困于无知和苦难的社会底层,他们选择生育是出于一种麻木;而任宁这种,可能从小到大未体验过任何切身苦难,

20 Dec 2025, 03:46 UTC≈5,850 viewsread 12 August 2026

嘛,我觉得基本可以说,X 可能不会 review my case 并解封账号了,我怀疑可能已经没有一个具体的真人团队在负责这个事情。 在邮箱里翻了下,之前碰到这个情况是 2019 年,申诉后会形成一个 Case ID 并通过邮件跟进,背后通向一个真人。现在的情况则是,你可以发送申诉,但没有任何自动或人工的回应。 之后具体是用 Bluesky 还是 Threads 接续这本日记,我还在想,暂时是两个都在试试,都有一些不习惯的地方,所以并不准备短时间内就做出选择。 https://bsky.app/profile/jesoooor.bsky.social https://www.threads.com/@jesoooor?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

16 Dec 2025, 11:20 UTC≈7,750 viewsread 12 August 2026

虽然账号申诉提交上去还不到一周,我暂未收到任何来自 X 官方的回复。但我已决定,如果这件事后续得不到妥善处置,我也不会再注册新的 X 账号,而是会去用 Bluesky,所以也请各位以后不要用这一话题来烦我。 我手里有一份所有推文的 archive,且 2021 年以后我大部分推文都是在 Ulysses 以纯文本方式先编辑,再发布到 Twitter 上的。所以即便不再使用 X,也并没有损失任何东西。实际上,自从 Musk 将 Twitter 改名为 X 之后,我可能一直在等待一个不再用它(作为我的日记本)的理由。 更重要的是,随年龄增长,我越来越意识到「数字信息能永久延续」这本身就是一个巨大的 myth,到最后,一切的信息依然要投射为肉体的感受和记忆才有意义,无法超越生命本身。 过去我曾将我高中时代的微博、贴吧账号,iTunes 音乐库、iCloud 照片流,Twitter 都视为过「一生尺度的存档」,想把它们维护至尽善尽美

13 Dec 2025, 11:10 UTC≈4,980 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @eessej

不是,我就不一个个回了,Twitter 账号被某个 bot 检测机制误杀了,已经申诉了,还在排队等人工,应该要几天。之前也有过一次,等了五天。

13 Nov 2025, 07:51 UTC≈7,270 viewsread 12 August 2026

iPhone 是《2001:太空漫游》里那座黑色方碑,简洁、纯粹、完美,仿佛宇宙中最天然的东西,超越理解。它的存在,需借助某种更高维度力量的约束,每每朝着「完美」多迈一步,背后都需要指数级的能力增长。Steve Jobs 和 Jony Ive 先于时代,窃取了这种力量,令 iPhone 成为了摩尔定律在物理世界的投射。 iPhone Air 将这一范式推向了极致巅峰,两块超瓷晶玻璃夹着闪闪发光的钛金属中框,令人无可挑剔。但即便是神迹,也会随时间磨损,最终祛魅。我从它身上,更多只感受到历史的残影。 过往的繁荣,以及我们对它的感受,也如同青春的丰盛一样,是仅有一次的稀缺体验。 https://jesor.me/2025/iphone-air-what-if-this-is-the-last-sandwich/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @forwardlikehell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 324,864 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“小破不入渠🌏” (@forwardlikehell), 6,849 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/forwardlikehell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.