2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 600–602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 17:48
601
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:38
601
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 16 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
86
Videos
1
Links
204
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
26
70.3%
👏
5
13.5%
🔥
2
5.41%
🗿
2
5.41%
❤
1
2.70%
🤔
1
2.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2022 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
前两天在 Facebook Marketplace 淘了个 $10 的 2006 iMac，回家折腾了一个周末，大体就是升级了三遍系统到 OS X Lion， 翻出自己的老 CD 看看 SuperDrive 还能不能用。最后用另一个 Mac 下载 Chrome Legacy，拷到U盘里再装在老 Mac 上， 这也算是 OS X Lion 上最后一款能访问互联网的软件了。
我看这台不知道让我如何是好的 iMac ，忽然发现了自己思维方式里的严重漏洞：算法已经深深地植入了我所有的决策系统之中。
离开科技评论界已经五年了，这五年里我都在 AWS 忙着工作的各种问题，我成为了巨大机器里面的小小齿轮，不停地转。虽然没有离开科技本身，五年之内，我对消费电子行业的敏感度越来越低，生产内容也成为了 priority list 上的最后一项。这并不是因为我不感兴趣； M1 的强势，iPhone Air 完全乔布斯方式的产品定位，电车的普及，A…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @JerryZhang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jerry Zhang 的频道” (@JerryZhang), 601 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JerryZhang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
