Channel
@fly_koptsev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
8,005subscribers
+25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001755913952 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fly_koptsev |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fly_koptsev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 8,005 | +29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 7,976 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 7,981 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 7,980 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 7,980 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (3 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,960 |
| Reactions total | 93 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
93 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 37.6% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 24.7% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 15.1% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 6.45% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 4.30% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 3.23% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.15% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.15% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.08% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fly_koptsev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGjKYDX | 1 | 10 August 2026 | 10 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFHRggTB | 1 | 4 August 2026 | 4 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Главная проблема ресторана может быть в команде. Сотрудники уходят, новых сложно найти, а постоянная текучка забирает время, деньги и влияет на сервис. Поэтому опыт тех, кто умеет удерживать команду и выстраивать процессы, особенно ценен. Мы собрали сильных экспертов ресторанного бизнеса — управление, команда и экономика. Добавляйте каналы https://t.me/addlist/yJ7nxXcuDvg2ODhi
👍3
А надо сюда писать свои заметки из жизни? Или только санитарию общепитовскую давать и ИИшные карусели с картинками?
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Понятно. Истории из жизни вам не интересны)
😁4❤3😢2
Вчера я видел небольшую аварию с участием машины и курьера на велосипеде, который вёз заказ. Курьеру 16 лет, и он влетел в заднюю дверь машины. Ущерб примерно оценили в 18 тысяч рублей. Когда я начал с ним разговаривать, он говорит: это уже вторая авария у него за две недели. До этого он точно так же влетел в машину, и там ущерб насчитали 115 тысяч рублей. Итого: тебе 16 лет, а ты уже за месяц ушёл в минус больше …
❤6😱4
С 1 сентября вступают в силу изменения в ТК РФ по сверхурочной работе. Спойлер: наконец-то хорошие новости в законодательстве для бизнеса. В частности, способ расчета сверхурочных меняется в пользу работодателей. 📌 13 августа в 14:00 мск DocsInBox приглашает на вебинар «Сверхурочные в общепите: новые требования с 1 сентября». О чем вебинар: 🔹 Можно ли ставить смены по 15 часов и что делать если сотрудники сами хотя…
❤2👍1🔥1
🍕Как одно сообщение спасло пиццерию от закрытия В конце 2022 года Фрэнк Стил открыл в Лас-Вегасе пиццерию Frankensons. К этому он шёл почти 30 лет, но спустя четыре месяца всё выглядело плохо: посетителей почти не было, дневная выручка держалась в районе $400, а денег не хватало даже на аренду. Один из сотрудников решил действовать самостоятельно и написал местному фуд-блогеру Киту Ли. Фрэнк об этом не знал. Блогер…
👍6❤3😐1
Опаньки. А вот и печатная статья о корнере “Dos Amigos” в гастромоле «Главный». Это статья для тех кто не любит смотреть видео, а любит почитать глазками 😃 👉🏻Читать тут
❤2👍2
Маркировка ножей и разделочных досок — один из самых простых и одновременно самых критичных элементов системы пищевой безопасности.
🔥3❤1🏆1
Решил ещё раз посмотреть на кофейню, а мне открылась тайная формула общепита 🫠
😁2
Если вы думали, что поварской фартук, висящий рядом с уличной курткой — это история исключительно про сомнительные ларьки на вокзале, то ... нет. В известных и больших ресторанах с этим тоже проблема Известный ресторан приостановил работу на 10 суток по решению суда. Повара хранили уличную одежду и еду в одних шкафах с чистой униформой. Для похода в туалет использовались грязные «дежурные» халаты (стирка которых не …
❤6🔥2
Ресторатор, напомни это своим поварам! Не забудь им купить униформу и обеспечить раздевалку с раздельными шкафчиками ⭐️ Мой директ - @koptsev_artem
❤5🔥3👌1
Сохраняйте себе руководство «Как подготовиться к проверке Роспотребнадзора. За месяц, за неделю, за час". Буду рад, если у вас в кафе вообще проверки никогда не будет. Но если вдруг так произойдет, то буду рад, если этот документ окажется для вас полезным. Буду рад, если вы его скачаете, внимательно прочитаете и примените в работе. Буду рад если вы поделитесь этим документом с ваших знакомых (повар, ресторатор), к…
🔥3❤2🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @fly_koptsev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А надо сюда писать свои заметки из жизни? Или только санитарию общепитовскую давать и ИИшные карусели с картинками?
The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 123,065 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Летучий Копцев” (@fly_koptsev), 8,005 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fly_koptsev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.