🚨 2.52 مليار دولار من البيتكوين تغادر المنصات! ₿🔥 بحسب @coinglass_com شهدت المنصات المركزية خروج نحو 30 ألف BTC خلال آخر 7 أيام، بقيمة تقارب 2.52 مليار دولار. 📉 انخفاض كمية البيتكوين الموجودة على المنصات 💰 انتقال السيولة إلى محافظ خارجية 👀 وغالبًا ما يُراقب هذا الاتجاه كمؤشر على تراجع المعروض المتاح للبيع 🔥 30 ألف بيتكوين خرجت من المنصات في أسبوع واحد!

Channel
أكاديمية مدار MTA | Crypto
@fl_tv
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,521subscribers
+1,738 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001411773787 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fl_tv |
| Description | القناة الرسمية أكاديمية مدار العملات الرقمية والكريبتو مصدرك العالمي لمعلومات التداول، نقدم لكم: 👈🏻دورات تدريبية معتمدة وشاملة. 👈🏻تحليلات العملات الرقمية. 👈🏻 توصيات دخول صفقات مضاربات سريعه استثمارية. Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/fl_tv |
| Created | 23 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fl_tv |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 43,521 | +163 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 43,358 | +57 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 43,301 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 43,308 | +35 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 43,273 | +167 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 43,106 | +17 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 43,089 | -27 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 43,116 | +31 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 43,085 | +125 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:03 | 42,960 | +98 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:47 | 42,862 | +72 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 42,790 | +83 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 42,707 | +53 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 42,654 | +78 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 42,576 | +58 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 42,518 | +75 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 42,443 | +52 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 42,391 | +99 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 42,292 | +87 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 42,205 | first reading |
Engagement
395 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.686%
- avg views ÷ 43,521 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 298
- 182 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.327%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 182
- of 395 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 182 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 395 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 54,320 |
| Reactions total | 38 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 11:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈19,100
- Videos
- ≈507
- Links
- ≈3,740
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 36m 32s
- Average length
- 1m 01s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
87 reactions across 64 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 75 | 86.2% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 5.75% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 3.45% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.30% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.15% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 395 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 395 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 395 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fl_tv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 395 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🚨 بعد الأحداث الأخيرة في منصات الكريبتو… تنوي تنقل تداولاتك إلى منصة أخرى؟ إذا كنت من أصحاب رؤوس الأموال أو أحجام التداول الكبيرة وتفكر في تجربة منصة بديلة، لدى @Bybit_Official حاليًا حملة ترحيبية لمستخدمي VIP مع مكافآت تصل إلى 1,000 USDT 💎 📌 المهام والمكافآت: 💰 أودِع 50,000$+ 🎁 احصل على 50 USDT إيردروب + تجربة VIP 1 📈 تداول 5,000,000$+ 🎁 200 USDT Trading Bonus + تجربة VIP 1 📈 تداول 10,000,000$+ 🎁 500 USDT Trad…
🚨 هيئة الأوراق المالية و البورصة ال SEC تقدم توضيحًا مهمًا لمشاريع الكريبتو! 🇺🇸🔥 قال موظفو SEC إن صيانة وتأمين وتطوير شبكة كريبتو تعمل بالفعل لا تُعتبر عادةً من “الجهود الإدارية الجوهرية” ضمن اختبار Howey. SEC ⛓️ صيانة الشبكة وتحديثها ≠ تلقائيًا ورقة مالية 🛠️ استمرار المطورين بتحسين الشبكة لا يكفي وحده لاجتياز Howey ⚠️ والتوضيح يخص الشبكات التي أصبحت Functional بالفعل 🔥 خطوة أخرى نحو رسم حدود أوضح بين شبكات الكريب…
🚨 الحكومة البريطانية تنشر قواعد رسمية لاستخدام الـAI! 🇬🇧🤖 ضمن إرشادات لتقليل الأثر البيئي للذكاء الاصطناعي، دعت الحكومة البريطانية إلى استخدامه بشكل أكثر كفاءة: 🔹 استخدم AI فقط عند الحاجة، وتأكد أولًا إن كان البحث أو Spreadsheet يكفي 🔹 اختر أصغر نموذج قادر على تنفيذ المهمة، مثل GPT Instant بدل Thinking عند عدم الحاجة 🔹 اجعل الـPrompts قصيرة وقلّل عددها قدر الإمكان 🔹 راجع بنفسك أي محتوى تم إنشاؤه بمساعدة AI 🔹 أفصح …
🚨 3.4 مليار دولار تهرب من سندات الشركات الأوروبية! 🇪🇺📉 بحسب @BofA_News شهدت صناديق سندات الشركات الأوروبية سحوبات بنحو 3.4 مليار دولار خلال أسبوع واحد في سبتمبر. 📉 السبب الرئيسي: اضطراب توقعات أسعار الفائدة 💰 المستثمرون يقللون تعرضهم لسندات الشركات ⚠️ تقلب العوائد يعيد الضغط على أسواق الديون 👀 عدم اليقين حول الفائدة بدأ يدفع السيولة للخروج من السندات الأوروبية.
🚨 سايلور يهاجم قانون الكريبتو الذي فشل في الكونغرس! 🇺🇸🔥 وصف Michael Saylor مشروع قانون CLARITY بأنه أشبه بـ "قانون للقيود" بدلًا من قانون للحقوق الرقمية. 📄 المشروع يتجاوز 630 صفحة ⛓️ وبحسب سايلور، نحو 600 صفحة منها عبارة عن قيود 🗣️ وقال إن معظم الضغط السياسي في واشنطن يدور حول تقييد استخدام الأصول الرقمية بدل توسيع فائدتها 🔥 سايلور يرى أن الكريبتو يحتاج حقوقًا رقمية واضحة... وليس المزيد من القيود.
🚨 إيثينا @ethena تتوسع من الكريبتو إلى سوق بقيمة +150 تريليون دولار! 🔥 تعمل Ethena على توسيع استراتيجية الـBasis Trade الخاصة بـUSDe لتشمل العقود الدائمة للأسهم عبر @binance . 💰 الفرصة الحالية في الكريبتو: نحو 2.5 تريليون دولار 📈 مع الأصول التقليدية: أكثر من 150 تريليون دولار ⛓️ دمج الأسهم والأسواق التقليدية مع بنية USDe
🚨 الـAI قد يلغي 25% من عمولات القطاع المالي! 🤖💰 يقول CEO شركة @Sharplink إن وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي AI Agents قد يخفضون 25% من العمولات المالية عالميًا بحلول 2035، ما قد يوفر للمستخدمين نحو 1.4 تريليون دولار سنويًا. 🤖 وكلاء ذكاء اصطناعيين AI Agents 💵 عملات مستقرة Stablecoins ⛓️ الأصول المرمّزة وDeFi 🔥 بحسب رؤيته، اجتماع هذه التقنيات سيقود إلى "الثورة المالية القادمة".
🚨 ترامب يرفض مقترح إيران... والتصعيد قد يعود بعد الانتخابات! 🇺🇸🇮🇷🔥 بحسب WSJ، رفض ترامب مقترح إيران لوقف إطلاق النار لمدة 7 أيام، وأبلغ مساعديه بأنه يتوقع عودة حملة القصف على إيران بعد انتخابات التجديد النصفي. ❌ لا رفع للحصار البحري الأمريكي حاليًا 🛢️ إيران عرضت إعادة فتح مضيق هرمز واستئناف المفاوضات النووية مقابل شروط تشمل رفع الحصار وتخفيف قيود النفط ووقف إطلاق النار 💣 ترامب يرى أن عودة القصف بعد الانتخابات تبقى …
🚨 تدفقات قياسية إلى صناديق @solana ! 🔥 سجلت صناديق Solana Spot ETFs الأمريكية صافي تدفقات بقيمة 80 مليون دولار أمس، وهو أكبر تدفق يومي في تاريخها. 💰 التدفقات الأسبوعية وصلت إلى 181 مليون دولار 📈 ثاني أعلى إجمالي أسبوعي على الإطلاق 🔥 والزخم المؤسسي نحو SOL يتسارع
📺 فيديو تحليل جديد على اليوتيوب 📺 🎯هذه المستويات ستحدد كل شيء! 🎯 البيتكوين يقترب من مناطق قد تحسم الحركة القادمة بالكامل 👀 اختراق أو كسر هذه المستويات قد يغيّر السيناريو بسرعة… لذلك التركيز الآن على السعر والسيولة معًا. 📊 أهم المستويات التي أراقبها الآن 💧 أين تتركز السيولة التي قد تجذب السعر؟ ₿ وما الذي قد يؤكد الاتجاه القادم للبيتكوين والكريبتو؟ تابع للنهاية… لأن رد فعل السعر عند هذه المستويات قد يكون المفتاح لف…
🚨خطة مخيفة لا أحد يتكلم عنها 🚨 https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RJjpbeXQqaKw
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 395 posts we hold for @fl_tv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fl_tv edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 13 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 22 September 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@bloomberg · 175,7257 postsGlassnode
@glassnode · 44,2123 postsInside Ads
@InsideAds_bot · 81,2963 postsThe Kobeissi Letter
@KobeissiLetter · 5483 postsMessari
@messaricrypto · 5,3243 postsPump.fun
@pumpfun · 42,7753 postsBybit Arabic
@BybitArabic · 31,6492 postsLookonchain
@lookonchain · 36,9432 postsPONS | pons . family
@PONSDOTFAMILY · 10,6052 postsClaude
@AnthropicAI · 6751 postArbitrum Announcements Official
@arbitrum · 8,9641 postBitMNR
@BitMNR · 3481 postCancore [Announcements]
@cancore_io · 167,0591 postCashcat gems
@cashcat · 8551 postWAGMI: Chainlink Community
@chainlink · 3,8521 postCoinGecko
@coingecko · 19,8331 postCoingl
@coinglass_com · 371 postLock
@invescous · 21 postNFT News | Web3, Gaming & Metaverse
@metaverses · 6121 postPolitico
@politico · 6,5921 postSantiment Intelligence
@SantimentData · 21 postTelegram News
@telegram · 9,461,6981 postTheBTCTherapist™️
@TheBTCTherapist · 71 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 17
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 17
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@fl_tv named 17 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 14 posts, 8 August 2026 – 24 September 2026
named in 11 posts, 15 August 2026 – 26 September 2026
named in 5 posts, 5 September 2026 – 21 September 2026
named in 4 posts, 9 August 2026 – 12 September 2026
named in 4 posts, 5 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
named in 3 posts, 24 September 2026 – 26 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 25 September 2026 – 26 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 10 September 2026 – 11 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 10 September 2026 – 11 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 7 September 2026 – 8 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 5 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 5 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 5 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
named in 1 post, 24 September 2026 – 24 September 2026
named in 1 post, 24 September 2026 – 24 September 2026
named in 1 post, 19 September 2026 – 19 September 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@h_tuf · 91,714
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
@Einglish_ra · 88,756
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@tg2ra · 93,352
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
@ln_tv · 97,355
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أكاديمية مدار MTA | Crypto” (@fl_tv), 43,521 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fl_tv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.