Официальный канал Финансового университета при Правительстве Российской Федерации
Предложить новость или задать вопрос: @finuniversitet_bot
Сайт: fa.ru
VK: vk.com/finuniversity
Rutube: rutube.ru/u/finuniver/
МАХ: max.ru/finuniversity
Created
26 September 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
67 measurements spanning 101 days, net +1,703. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,298–27,541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 12:47
27,260
+2
11 Nov 2026, 11:58
27,258
+1
9 Nov 2026, 14:09
27,257
+10
8 Nov 2026, 07:06
27,247
+4
6 Nov 2026, 23:11
27,243
+2
5 Nov 2026, 20:54
27,241
+3
4 Nov 2026, 18:09
27,238
+1
3 Nov 2026, 17:20
27,237
+4
2 Nov 2026, 17:07
27,233
+1
1 Nov 2026, 15:50
27,232
+1
31 Oct 2026, 14:57
27,231
-21
30 Oct 2026, 17:36
27,252
+9
29 Oct 2026, 17:56
27,243
+4
28 Oct 2026, 18:19
27,239
+1
27 Oct 2026, 17:59
27,238
+2
26 Oct 2026, 20:56
27,236
-3
25 Oct 2026, 19:07
27,239
+6
24 Oct 2026, 18:57
27,233
-8
23 Oct 2026, 20:55
27,241
-1
22 Oct 2026, 18:07
27,242
first reading
Engagement
289 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 159 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.79%
avg views ÷ 27,260 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,120
89 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.945%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
89
of 289 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
289 (31 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
188,985
Reactions total
1,785
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Nov 2026, 04:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,720
Videos
≈271
Links
≈7,820
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 34m
Average length
3m 23s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,920 reactions across 283 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,303
54.3%
🔥
1,127
14.2%
❤🔥
993
12.5%
custom 5346217686235911159
270
3.41%
👍
269
3.40%
custom 5323288436390504312
252
3.18%
🎉
124
1.57%
😎
106
1.34%
⚡
104
1.31%
💔
84
1.06%
🕊
65
0.821%
😍
54
0.682%
🙏
50
0.631%
👀
40
0.505%
💯
40
0.505%
🤝
16
0.202%
🏆
12
0.152%
🤩
11
0.139%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 289 of the 289 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 289 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 289 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @finuniverchan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 289 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 89 posts held from the last 30 days (10.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🏙 Хотите уверенно работать в сфере недвижимости и не допускать дорогих ошибок?
16 ноября в Финансовом университете при Правительстве РФ стартует программа повышения квалификации «Сделки с недвижимостью: правовые риски и защита прав»!
👩🏫 Спикеры:
Киракосян С.А., медиатор, советник адвокатского бюро «БВМП», заместитель председателя Комитета ТПП РФ по предпринимательству в сфере ЖКХ, член Комитета ТПП по предпринима…
Серия вебинаров «Все о профессиях» 🎓
💡 Можно ли «прочитать» человека по жестам и мимике? И чем на самом деле занимается профайлер — не как в сериалах, а в реальной работе?
🔗 Приглашаем на вебинар «Профайлинг: как читать поведение, не читая мысли»
На вебинаре обсудим ⬇️
✅ кто такой профайлер и какие задачи он решает
✅ можно ли определить ложь по мимике, жестам и речи — и почему это не так просто
✅ где работает проф…
ФИН ПОДКАСТ | Финансовая безопасность: как распознать мошенника и защитить свои деньги
🔗 В новом выпуске поговорим о том, как не попасться на уловки мошенников, распознать мошеннические схемы, почему нельзя сообщать код из СМС и что делать, если вас пытаются убедить срочно перевести деньги
В гостях ⬇️
✅ Полина Петрова — эксперт Главного Управления Банка России по Центральному федеральному округу
Подкаст — совместн…
Преподавателям и научным работникам Финансового университета вручены награды Мэра Москвы 🎖️
📌 13 ноября, в рамках мероприятий ко Дню экономиста, преподавателям и научным работникам экономических факультетов и кафедр ведущих столичных вузов вручили почетные звания и знаки отличия города Москвы
Указ о присвоении почетных званий подписал Мэр Москвы Сергей Собянин, а награды от имени Правительства Москвы вручила замест…
Цивилизационный код России и архитектура будущего! 💡
🔗 12 ноября в Финуниверситете прошла лекция начальника Управления Президента РФ по вопросам мониторинга и анализа социальных процессов Александра Харичева «Цивилизация Россия. Архитектура будущего»
Мероприятие состоялось в рамках межвузовского курса «Архитектура социальных изменений: практики управления общественными процессами»
📌 Центральной темой лекции стало …
Мечтаете поступить в Лицей Финансового университета? ✨
🔗 Открыта регистрация на очные курсы подготовки к вступительным испытаниям для девятиклассников
Предметы (на выбор) ⬇️
▫️математика
▫️русский язык
▫️обществознание
▫️английский язык
👥 Формат: очный курс с применением ДОТ (вебинары), группы по 10–15 человек
📅 Период обучения: с декабря по апрель
🩵 Регистрация
#ПроПоступление
💬МАХ 💙VK 📺Rutube 📝Дзен
Общественный совет при ФНС России вошел в группу «А» — «Лидеры итогового рейтинга» общественных советов при ФОИВ
🔗 По итогам рейтинга за 2025 год совет занял 2-е место среди общественных советов при федеральных службах и вошел в топ-5 лучших
Рейтинг подготовили Общественная палата Российской Федерации и рейтинговое агентство RAEX
Председатель Общественного совета при ФНС России, ректор Финансового университета Ста…
25 лет Росфинмониторингу!
🔗 Делимся с вами кадрами с Международной научно-практической конференции Международного сетевого института в сфере ПОД/ФТ «Новые технологии и ПОД/ФТ: вызов или возможность»
Приятного просмотра! ✔️
#Финансовыйуниверситет
💬МАХ 💙VK 📺Rutube 📝Дзен
🌎 Стартовала Международная
студенческая олимпиада
«НАЛОГИ» 2026
Организаторами являются ФНС России, Академия ФНС ЛАБ, МГУ имени М.В. Ломоносова, Молодёжный союз юристов РФ и Финансовый университет при Правительстве РФ.
🔍Участники получат возможность показать свои знания и навыки в решении задач в области налогов, юриспруденции, экономики и финансов.
📄Организаторы подготовили четыре номинации:
1. «Налоговое право»
…
Учебник «Очерки по экономике» удостоен премии «Экономическая книга года — 2026» 📖
🔗11 ноября, в День экономиста, на XI Всероссийском экономическом Собрании Вольного экономического общества России учебник для вузов «Очерки по экономике» под редакцией Валерия Фадеева стал победителем в номинации «Учебник и учебные пособия»
Учебник подготовили авторские коллективы Финансового университета, РГГУ, СПбГУ и ведущие экспер…
🔍 Ледяная тишина встречает огненный ритм, и полная луна внимает их танцу. Две стихии сплетаются воедино и открывают врата туда, где невозможное становится реальным
Бал Полной Луны — ежегодное мероприятие Финансового университета, где тысячи студентов кружатся в вальсе
Вас ждут творческие номера, танцы, интерактивы и сюрпризы, которые сделают этот вечер по-настоящему запоминающимся ✨
📅 25 ноября в 17:00
📍 Концертны…
До экзаменов осталось полгода, и вы хотите провести это время максимально эффективно — этот вариант для вас!👇
🔗 Финансовый университет открывает набор на очные курсы по подготовке к ЕГЭ! 🎓
Предметы (на выбор) ⬇️
▫️профильная математика
▫️обществознание
▫️русский язык
▫️английский язык
▫️информатика
▫️история
📍 Где: Ленинградский проспект, д. 51/1
👥 Формат: мини-группы по 12–18 человек
📅 Когда: 1 раз в неделю по 4…
❤7❤🔥3😎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 289 posts we hold for @finuniverchan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@finuniverchan edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 November 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А какие активности форума «Все начинается с ПСБ» вам понравились больше всего?
Понравилась фотобудка21%
Понравилась караоке-будка16%
Понравился кнопочный бой14%
Хочу все активности в Финуниверситете навсегда66%
Не заметил активностей19%
The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 289 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Максим Коваль. ЕГЭ по математике @MO_EGE · 81,693#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Eli Isaev @Isaev1964 · 60,418 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 September 2026
Казначейство России @TreasuryofRussia · 21,302 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Финансовый университет” (@finuniverchan), 27,260 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/finuniverchan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.