2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 429–431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 07:00
430
no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:52
430
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 2 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.0%
avg views ÷ 430 subscribers
Avg views / post
189
1 post measured
Reaction rate
9.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held
18 (2 May 2026 – 22 July 2026)
Views total
189
Reactions total
18
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
266
Videos
33
Links
108
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
247 reactions across 12 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
160
64.8%
🔥
40
16.2%
👏
10
4.05%
👍
8
3.24%
🎉
7
2.83%
🤩
7
2.83%
❤🔥
4
1.62%
🤯
4
1.62%
🤣
3
1.21%
🤨
2
0.81%
👌
1
0.405%
😍
1
0.405%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 247reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fest2prov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 May 2026 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Уже скоро, 28.07 в 19:30 состоится вечеринка в честь 5-ЛЕТИЯ нашего пребывания в импровизации 🎉🎉🎉
Это сотни часов занятий и репетиций, десятки просмотренных и сыгранных выступлений, участие и организация фестивалей. Да чего только не было за эти 5 лет 😱
И в этот вечер мы хотим разделись с вами радость соприкосновения с импровом 😍
Конечно, мы выступим как Family Twoprov, но не так, как все привыкли
Вы точно узнает…
Ура, скоро БРИФ — самый крупный фест по импровизации! А мы фесты любим! Еще многие участники тупров феста засветятся и на брифе!
До 6 июля можно купить билеты на основную программу по самой низкой стоимости. Пока не выкатили расписание, но по секрету вам скажу, что там точно выступят мои любимые Правило Четырех, Сабраж, Шоу импровизационных историй, а еще обещают много сюрпризов.
Фест на столько вырос, что в этом г…
В эту ночь лес живёт по другим правилам.
3–5 июля — эМпров Кэмп: Ночь Купалы.
Три дня в сосновом лесу на берегу Финского залива.
Что вас ждёт:
🌿 Погружение в атмосферу старинного праздника — венки на воде, костёр, легенды
🌊 Пляж и купание на Финском заливе
🎭 Мастер-класс по импровизации
🔥 Прыжки через костёр и ритуалы Купалы
🌲 Ночной квест в лесу — в полночь папоротник расцветает раз в году
🗓 3–5 июля · Солнечное
…
Старт продаж билетов на основную программу BRIF 2026! 🎉
Первые билеты на основную программу — уже в продаже. Сейчас можно купить билет на все три дня — с 21 по 23 августа. Билеты на один день появятся позже
Как устроена рассадка в зале?
В этом году цена билета зависит от выбранного сектора, всего их три. Рассадка в зале — ярусная театральная (ряды возвышаются для лучшей видимости). Билет дает право на вход в опред…
ДИФ "Шамайка" (Ростов) - лучше один раз съездить и своими глазами увидеть, впечатлиться и влюбиться в фестиваль в Ростове-на-Дону.
Предупреждаем: может вызывает привыкание и непреодолимое желание ездить сюда каждый год.
Дмитрий Вьюшкин и "MIF" (Москва) - импровизатор, сторителлер, стендап-комик, организатор московского импров-фестиваля MIF, основатель и преподаватель школы Improv Moscow.
Дима Филиппов и Improv Liv…
Всем привет.
На связи команда Twoprov Fest 👋
Прошёл ровно месяц с окончания фестиваля.
Команда продолжает работать и вспоминает прекрасные дни феста.
А сейчас пришло время поблагодарить тех, кто нас постоянно поддерживает в своих сетях и рассказывает о нас. С кем-то мы дружим давно, с кем-то соприкасаемся чуть меньше, кто-то для нас стал интересным открытием.
Если вдруг мы вас не упомянули - напишите нам. Мы это и…
🔥Горячие новости🔥
Сегодня День рождения у самого молодого организатора Twoprov Fest'а.
Лерочка @Va_ler_y ты наше вдохновение, наша красавица, наша булочка! 💅
Поздравляем тебя с Днем рождения✨!
Впереди у тебя большая жизнь. Пусть она будет яркой, увлекательной, интересной и впечатляющей. Оставайся верной себе и своим мечтам! ⚡️
Ты восхитительная, прекрасная и талантливая! От всех нас желаем, чтобы тебе везло в жиз…
❗️ALARM❗️
Мы сегодня с двумя моментами к вам.
1. Обнаружены потеряшки. Платок и очки ищут своих хозяев/хозяек. Если узнали в них свое или знаете чье, напишите Натали @NataliPiter
2. Вечеринка после феста.
К сожалению по какой-то случайности не все вспомнили, что надо перевести деньги за ресторан. Видео чека прикладываем.
Пожалуйста, если вы вспомнили, что забыли перевести деньги, то сделайте это.
Переводим по номе…
🤯4🤨2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fest2prov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 102,183 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@fest2prov named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@dif_shamaika named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Twoprov Fest SPb” (@fest2prov), 430 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fest2prov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
