Channel
@Lubimie_tuprov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003984000039 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Lubimie_tuprov |
| Description | Импро команда двух подруг. Несем в мир идеи Жизни и Любви Играем узнаваемые отношения и себя в них, прикрываясь вуалью персонажей А зритель узнает в нас себя, проживая ту самую Жизнь и Любовь @MariyaTiho @Valentina_Kozelskaya |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 8 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Lubimie_tuprov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 7 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 7 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 55.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 30.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Маша и Валя, вы прям чувствуете друг друга, и если что-то не понимаете, то говорите — это самый кайф был, лично для меня. Проговаривали то, как услышали или неизвестные слова и это рождало юмор, живость и раскрывало отношения персонажей еще глубже. Ну и еще отметил, как вы статусами менялись. На работе — Маша хозяин (мужского персонажа играла), а дома — Валя. Спасибо, что позвали)
❤🔥1💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
«Я даже заплакала, это было так трогательно…» «Вы показали ЖИЗНЬ. Спасибо. Так душевно. В самое сердце» «Я и посмеялся, и переживал. Какие вы классные!» «Вам срочно нужно ехать на МИФ в Москву, чтобы показаться Вьюшкину» 😃 Эти и другие приятные комментарии мы получили вчера после нашего выступления. И, конечно, не обошлось без самого комплиментарного комплимента для импровизаторов: «А это что, был не сценарий?»…
❤🔥2❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4
Поддержка в импрове и жизни Мы вчера Повайбились ✨ На выходных с Машей собрались у неё дома на целые сутки. Я подарила индийский успокаивающий чай, Маша напекла вкуснючих шоколадных блинчиков на утро. Семейный, теплый вайб, невозможная вкуснота и прогулка в Новоорловском заказнике 🌲 Много смеялись. Много разговаривали. Много — об Импрове, о нашем предстоящем первым выступлении. Разбирали игровые моменты, смотрели…
❤6
Photo, posted without a caption
Здесь делитесь какой импров нравится вам? А так же очень ждем вас 10 мая на нашем дебютном выступлении в формате Тупров Будет камерно и тепло 🤍
Что в импро самое вкусное ? Самый смак для зрителя и для актера 3 типа импро , которые мы выделили
🔥1
С каких выступлений хочется уйти и почему ?
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Lubimie_tuprov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Любимые Тупров” (@Lubimie_tuprov), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lubimie_tuprov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.