Channel
@feolog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
159subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001494635358 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @feolog |
| Description | 📌Заметки о механизмах нашей жизни ⚙️🔗 https://feology.ru Мои контакты для записи: +79055674378 Feoengdeu@gmail.com |
| Created | 17 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/feolog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 159 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 159 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (3 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 595 |
| Reactions total | 124 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
176 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 51 | 29.0% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 25.0% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 13.1% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 9.66% | |
| custom 5456311136985034479 | 11 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 6.25% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 2.84% | |
| custom 5301188016449014333 | 3 | 1.70% | |
| custom 5458406582809274841 | 3 | 1.70% | |
| custom 5456114513382223181 | 2 | 1.14% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 1.14% | |
| custom 5301274628759506668 | 1 | 0.568% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.568% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.568% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.568% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔎 Долгое время в психологии было два измерения «хорошей жизни»: ⏺️ гедоническое благополучие — Насколько человеку приятно жить? Испытывает ли он положительные эмоции? ⏺️ эвдемоническое благополучие — Есть ли в жизни смысл, чувство цели, ощущение, что человек реализует себя? Но исследователи давно заметили, что некоторые люди не вписываются в эти два параметра. Представьте человека, создающего рискованный стартап.…
Многие люди считают, что важные достижения — это то, что ты создал вовне. Но некоторые видят, что самые важные достижения — это то, что ты создал внутри. Способность к близости, доверию (себе, людям, миру), выбору, заботе.
💔6💯5custom 54563111369850344793😢1
Знаете, вот у некоторых людей не внутренний критик, а внутренний теppoRист. Критик хотя бы хочет «как лучше», просто умеет только из ужаса газлайтить, а вот этот персонаж кошмарит дай боже: его задача — навести такой страх, чтобы ты в ужасе начал исправлять ситуацию.
💯4🔥2😁1😢1custom 53012746287595066681
Хрупкие люди Книга однозначно отправляется в список “must-read”. Читается легко, слог живой, хотя само содержание достаточно экспертное: много зарисовок с описанием «логики жизни» людей с нарциссическим дефицитом. Мне не понравилась редактура. Возможно, это только в этом издании. И это уже оформление, а не содержание. В общем, если тема Вас интересует - очень советую!
❤2🔥2custom 53011880164490143332
Подумалось: интересно, какие фразы засели у вас в голове с детства? И какие они следы оставили на вашем характере? Например, «куй железо пока горячо», «без труда не выловишь и рыбку из пруда», «бери пока дают», «спрос в лоб не ударит»… Может не пословицами и поговорками, а просто фразы, которые легли в основу мировоззрения? Хочу сделать разбор в посте)
❤3
Помню, когда закончила аспирантуру, уже написала диссертацию по философии культуры — был полный текст, можно было выходить на предзащиту и… я решила не защищать диссертацию. Люди, слышащие от меня эти слова, не верили своим ушам. У меня перед глазами сцена из фильма Гая Ричи «Рок-н-рольщик», где Арчи говорит «4 f&cking long years”, только у меня на год меньше 😸 То, что можно было защитить тот текст, не означало, ч…
❤6💯6😁6
Последнее время много думаю о нарциссических чертах и травмах. И задумалась над тем, как часто люди становятся заложниками своего потенциала. Особенно после фраз в стиле «какой умный ребенок, жаль, что такой ленивый», запускающий бесконечный стыд и ответственность за удовлетворение потребностей других людей = попытки доказать, что соответствуешь потенциалу. А потенциал как горизонт…его всегда больше, чем возможност…
💯7❤6🤔5custom 54563111369850344792❤🔥1
Choose wisely 😸
😁8❤4💯3
Не позволяйте тем, кому сложно любить, убедить Вас, что сложно любить именно Вас.
💔7💯5❤2custom 54584065828092748411
Спасибо всем, кто пришел на практикум по снам 💤 ✨ Надеюсь, все обладатели билета получили письмо с ссылкой на запись мероприятия? Если вдруг этого не произошло - свяжитесь со мной. Отдельно запись можно будет приобрести так: 1. Оплачиваете доступ переводом на карту 2200700168769619 или по номеру телефона +79055674378 Указываете в комментариях свой email или тг 2. На почту/ в тг придет письмо со ссылкой на запись…
❤5🔥3
Кокон — это не место застоя. Это место метаморфоз.
💯7💔4❤2custom 53011880164490143331
Feology: о культуре и психоанализе 🧐 pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @feolog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ПЕРЕКЛИЧКА: лекция по снам 18.07
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Feology: о культуре и психоанализе 🧐” (@feolog), 159 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/feolog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.