Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Пропаганда Феминизма

@fempropaganda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

126subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001459045049
TypeChannel
Username@fempropaganda
Created15 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/fempropaganda

Growth

1261281276 August 2026 — 128 subscribers9 August 2026 — 128 subscribers14 August 2026 — 126 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 126–128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:54126-2
9 Aug 2026, 01:45128no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:02128first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 25 January 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4075.5%
😢47.55%
🤡47.55%
🤬35.66%
👍23.77%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2022 to 4 June 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jun 2022, 15:27 UTC850 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Дизайнерка этого поста: Лиза Новохацкая.

11🤡2

4 Jun 2022, 15:25 UTC842 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мы опубликовали новый выпуск рубрики "Феминистки читают", в которой мы обсуждаем феминистские книги вместе с Машей Буровой, создательницей телеграм-канала "Женщина пишет". В этом эпизоде мы поговорили про книгу Мэгги Нельсон "Красные части: автобиография одного суда". Этот выпуск был записан до 24 февраля 2022 года. Послушать новый эпизод можно по этой ссылке на удобной вам подкастной платформе. Материал, упомянуты

9👍1🤡1

24 May 2022, 18:50 UTC683 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мы опубликовали новый эпизод, в котором поговорили про РПП, бодипозитив и феминизм. Этот выпуск был записан до 24 февраля 2022. Гостьями эпизода стали Ирина Ушкова, клинический психолог и специалистка по работе с расстройствами пищевого поведения и образа тела, и бодипозитивн_ая активист_ка Милая Оли. 🔸Вместе с Ириной мы обсудили, какие расстройства пищевого поведения бывают, почему ими чаще заболевают женщины и как

8

1 May 2022, 09:27 UTC510 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Тасия и Дина были гостьями одного из наших выпусков, в котором рассказывали о фемактивизме в Татарстане. Мы выражаем свою солидарность и поддержку Тасии, Дине и Айгуль и просим вас поддержать их, если у вас есть такая возможность. В скрине поста ФемКызлар в инстаграме - карты Тасии, Дины и Айгуль.

😢4👍1🤬1

1 May 2022, 09:25 UTC427 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @femkyzlar

У соосновательниц ФемКызлар Тасии Альбариньо и Дины Нурм прошли обыски. Основанием стало дело, по которому еще в марте прошла серия обысков: тогда некое лицо под ником miki mouse написало в чат "Протестная Казань" сообщение с призывом к массовым беспорядкам. У Дины и Тасии изъяли технику.

🤬1

1 May 2022, 09:25 UTC423 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @femkyzlar

Также обыск прошел в эту среду у админки ФемКызлар Айгуль. Изъяли телефон Айгуль, ноутбук отца, планшет ребенка.

🤬1

21 Apr 2022, 15:32 UTC448 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Дорогие наши слушатель_ницы, Если вы слушаете нас из России, расскажите нам, пожалуйста, есть ли у вас какие-то проблемы с прослушиванием последнего эпизода подкаста?

  1. Послушал_а новый выпуск без проблем31%
  2. Послушал_а новый выпуск, но он плохо грузился0%
  3. Не послушал_а выпуск, потому что он не грузится6%
  4. Еще не слушал_а, поэтому не знаю63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @fempropaganda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Apr 2022, 15:32 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

Дорогие наши слушатель_ницы, Если вы слушаете нас из России, расскажите нам, пожалуйста, есть ли у вас какие-то проблемы с прослушиванием последнего эпизода подкаста?

  1. Послушал_а новый выпуск без проблем31%
  2. Послушал_а новый выпуск, но он плохо грузился0%
  3. Не послушал_а выпуск, потому что он не грузится6%
  4. Еще не слушал_а, поэтому не знаю63%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2022 to 4 June 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,089,728 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пропаганда Феминизма” (@fempropaganda), 126 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fempropaganda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.