Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 霏霏个人sm丝足抓龙筋

Channel

霏霏个人sm丝足抓龙筋

@fefieizlj668

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,303subscribers

+2,297 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004312546452
TypeChannel
Username@fefieizlj668
Created2 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fefieizlj668

Growth

63,3111,658.53 September 2026 — 6 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,024 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,942 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,311 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,303 subscribers2,3033 September 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 14 days, net +2,297. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:192,303-1,008
13 Sept 2026, 21:013,311+369
10 Sept 2026, 01:402,942+1,918
4 Sept 2026, 20:361,024+1,018
3 Sept 2026, 20:226no change
3 Sept 2026, 19:476first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 2 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.68%
avg views ÷ 2,303 subscribers
Avg views / post
38.8
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held9 (2 September 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total310
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 12:19 UTC44 viewsread 3 September 2026

上海【蕉点】 🎟福利5折6折|抽奖红包🧧 🎭蕉友男群 https://t.me/SHjdqun 🏆蕉点总榜 https://t.me/shjiaodian/1359 🥇好评榜单 https://t.me/shjdtop 🏆 蕉点蕉友群是极搜上海区排名第一群 (点击查看) 的真实活跃大群,有5w+真实蕉友,欢迎学长们加入! ——————————————— 🍌上榜管理 @SHjiaoge

3 Sept 2026, 11:46 UTC39 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

霖霖老师简介 三年抓龙筋经验 00后反差甜妹,情绪价值到位 手法专业,颜值高,声音甜

2 Sept 2026, 16:08 UTC40 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

【何为抓龙筋?】 通过按摩和刺激男性生殖器周围的特定穴位经络来提升性功能 🤩增强性功能:增强性功能:不少人表示在经过抓龙筋疗程后,性能力显著提升,时间更持久,硬度更好 🤩放松和减压:很多体验者认为,抓龙筋不仅有助于性功能,还能带来身心的放松,减轻生活,工作压力 【抓龙筋就是打飞机吗❓❓❓】 这是抓龙筋项目争议最大的一个地方,大部分人都会把抓龙筋和普通的92打飞机项目混为一谈,。实际上这两个项目的区别是非常大的,抓龙筋的本质是理疗项目,整个流程科学严谨,是对男性功能的一种保养和治疗。而我们姐妹的手法是针对国内客户进行了升级,在理疗保养的基础上还能满足部分客户的其他需求。

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @fefieizlj668. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“霏霏个人sm丝足抓龙筋” (@fefieizlj668), 2,303 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fefieizlj668.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.